Influencing laughter with AI-mediated communication

References

1. Acerbi, A.
   (2019) Cognitive attraction and online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–7. 10.1057/s41599‑019‑0224‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0224-y [Google Scholar]
2. Adadi, A., & Berrada, M.
   (2018) Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE access, 6, 52138–52160. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
   https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 [Google Scholar]
3. Adelmann, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B.
   (1989) Facial efference and the experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249–280. 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.001341
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.001341 [Google Scholar]
4. Arias, P., Soladie, C., Bouafif, O., Roebel, A., Seguier, R., & Aucouturier, J. J.
   (2018) Realistic transformation of facial and vocal smiles in real-time audiovisual streams. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 11(3), 507–518. 10.1109/TAFFC.2018.2811465
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2018.2811465 [Google Scholar]
5. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., & Herrera, F.
   (2020) Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 [Google Scholar]
6. Bachorowski, J. & Owren, J.
   (2001) Not all laughs are alike: Voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect. Psychological Science12.3, pp.252–257. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00346
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00346 [Google Scholar]
7. Bachorowski, J. and Michael J. Owren
   (2002) Vocal acoustics in emotional intelligence. Emotions and social behavior. The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence, pp.11–36.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bachorowski, J., Smoski, J. & Owren, J.
   (2001) The acoustic features of human laughter. In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America110.3, pp.1581–1597. 10.1121/1.1391244
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1391244 [Google Scholar]
9. Bailenson, J. N.
   (2006) Transformed social interaction in collaborative virtual environments. Digital media: Transformations in human communication, 255–264.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bangerter, A., Mayor, E., & Knutsen, D.
    (2020) Lexical entrainment without conceptual pacts? Revisiting the matching task. Journal of Memory and Language, 114, 104–129. 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104129
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104129 [Google Scholar]
11. Banning, M. R., & Nelson, D. L.
    (1987) The effects of activity-elicited humor and group structure on group cohesion and affective responses. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(8), 510–514. 10.5014/ajot.41.8.510
    https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.41.8.510 [Google Scholar]
12. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L.
    (2014) The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. InH. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp.311–344). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Barsade, S. G.
    (2002) The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative science quarterly, 47(4), 644–675. 10.2307/3094912
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912 [Google Scholar]
14. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J.
    (1986) I show how you feel: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 322–329. 10.1037/0022‑3514.50.2.322
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.322 [Google Scholar]
15. Bebbington, K., MacLeod, C., Ellison, T. M., & Fay, N.
    (2017) The sky is falling: Evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 92–101. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.004 [Google Scholar]
16. Bernieri, F. J., Reznick, J. S., & Rosenthal, R.
    (1988) Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother–infant interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 243–253. 10.1037/0022‑3514.54.2.243
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.243 [Google Scholar]
17. Blakemore, S., & Frith, C.
    (2005) The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuopsychologia, 43(2), 260–267. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.012 [Google Scholar]
18. Brody, S. & Diakopoulos, N.
    (2011) Cooooooooooooooollllllllllllll‼‼‼‼‼‼‼: Using word lengthening to detect sentiment in microblogs. Proceedings of EMNLP’11, 562–570.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bryant, G. A.
    (2020) Evolution, structure, and functions of human laughter. The handbook of communication science and biology (pp.63–77). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351235587‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351235587-7 [Google Scholar]
20. Bryant, G. A., Wang, C. S., & Fusaroli, R.
    (2020) Recognizing affiliation in colaughter and cospeech. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201092. 10.1098/rsos.201092
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201092 [Google Scholar]
21. Buckley, F. H.
    (2014) 14 Schadenfreude and laughter. Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others, edited byWilco W. van Dijk, Jaap W. Ouwerkerk, 219. 10.1017/CBO9781139084246.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084246.018 [Google Scholar]
22. Bush, L. K., Barr, C. L., McHugo, G. J. & Lanzetta, J.
    (1989) The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reactions to comedy routines. Motivation and Emotion13, 31–52 (1989) 10.1007/BF00995543
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995543 [Google Scholar]
23. Butcher, J., & Whissell, C.
    (1984) Laughter as a function of audience size, sex of the audience, and segments of the short film Duck Soup. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59(3), 949–950. 10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.949
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.949 [Google Scholar]
24. Cappella, J. N., & Planalp, S.
    (1981) Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations: III. Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7, 117–132. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1981.tb00564.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00564.x [Google Scholar]
25. Castelvecchi, D.
    (2016) Can we open the black box of AI?Nature News538 (7623) 20. 10.1038/538020a
    https://doi.org/10.1038/538020a [Google Scholar]
26. Chapple, E. D.
    (1982) Movement and sound: The musical language of body rhythms in interaction. InM. Davis (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp.31–52). New York: Human Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A.
    (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. 10.1037/0022‑3514.76.6.893
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 [Google Scholar]
28. Chartrand, T. L., & Jefferis, V. E.
    (2003) Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry. Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes, 290–305.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Chartrand, T. L., Maddux, W. W., & Lakin, J. L.
    (2005) Beyond the perception-behavior link: The ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. InR. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp.334–361). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Cheng, L. P., Marwecki, S., & Baudisch, P.
    (2017, October). Mutual human actuation. Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp.797–805). 10.1145/3126594.3126667
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126667 [Google Scholar]
31. Chivers, T.
    (2019) A theory in crisis. Nature, 576(7786), 200–202. 10.1038/d41586‑019‑03755‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03755-2 [Google Scholar]
32. Christopherson, L.
    (2013) OMG! l2spell online: The creative vocabulary of cyberlanguagePhD thesis, University of North Carolina.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Cicourel, A. V.
    (1974) Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Davila Ross, M., Menzler, S., Zimmermann, E.
    (2007) Rapid facial mimicry in orangutan play. Biology letters4.1, pp.27–30.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Davila-Ross, M., Allcock, B., Thomas, C., & Bard, K. A.
    (2011) Aping expressions? Chimpanzees produce distinct laugh types when responding to laughter of others. Emotion11.5, p.1013. 10.1037/a0022594
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022594 [Google Scholar]
36. Davila-Ross, M., Owren, M. J., & Zimmermann, E.
    (2009) Reconstructing the evolution of laughter in great apes and humans. Current Biology, 19, 1106–1111. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.028
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.028 [Google Scholar]
37. DeVito, M. A., Gergle, D., & Birnholtz, J.
    (2017) Algorithms ruin everything # RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp.3163–3174). 10.1145/3025453.3025659
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025659 [Google Scholar]
38. Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A.
    (2001) The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. InM. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol.33 (pp.1–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Dunbar, R. I.
    (2012) Bridging the bonding gap: the transition from primates to humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1597), 1837–1846. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0217
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0217 [Google Scholar]
40. Duran, N. D., Paxton, A., & Fusaroli, R.
    (2019) ALIGN: Analyzing linguistic interactions with generalizable techNiques – A Python library. Psychological methods, 24(4), 419. 10.1037/met0000206
    https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000206 [Google Scholar]
41. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
    (1970) Ethology: The biology of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
    [Google Scholar]
42. Eshghi, A.; Maraev, V.; Howes, C.; Hough, J.; & Mazzocconi, C.
    (2019) What are you laughing at? Incremental processing of laughter in interaction. InHowes, C.; and Hough, J., editor(s), Proceedings of SemDial 2019 (LondonLogue) 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., & Sandvig, C.
    (2015) I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close to [her] Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp.153–162).
    [Google Scholar]
44. Firth, A.
    (1996) The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’English and conversation analysis. Journal of pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259. 10.1016/0378‑2166(96)00014‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8 [Google Scholar]
45. Fischer, K.
    (2016) Designing Speech for a Recipient: The roles of partner modeling, alignment and feedback in so-called simplified registers (Vol.270). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.270
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.270 [Google Scholar]
46. Fischer, K., Jensen, L. C., Zitzmann, N.
    (2022) In the same boat: The Influence of Sharing the Situational Context on a Speaker’s (a Robot’s) Persuasiveness, Interaction Studies – this volume.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K.
    (2014) Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147–157. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005 [Google Scholar]
48. Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K.
    (2016) Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, Interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive science, 40(1), 145–171. 10.1111/cogs.12251
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12251 [Google Scholar]
49. Galantucci, B., & Roberts, G.
    (2014) Do we notice when communication goes awry? an investigation of people’s sensitivity to coherence in spontaneous conversation. PloS one, 9(7), e103182. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103182
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103182 [Google Scholar]
50. Galantucci, B., Roberts, G., & Langstein, B.
    (2018) Content deafness: When coherent talk just doesn’t matter. Language & Communication, 61, 29–34. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.001 [Google Scholar]
51. Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S.
    (2005) The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: A synthetic approach. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80, 395–430. 10.1086/498281
    https://doi.org/10.1086/498281 [Google Scholar]
52. Ginzburg, J., Breitholtz, E., Cooper, R., Hough, J., & Tian, Y.
    (2015) Understanding laughter. Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam Colloquium. University of Amsterdam. semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mVkOTk2N/AC2015-proceedings.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
53. Ginzburg, J., Mazzocconi, C., & Tian, Y.
    (2020) Laughter as language. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 104. 10.5334/gjgl.1152
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1152 [Google Scholar]
54. Glenn, P.
    (2003) Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519888
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888 [Google Scholar]
55. Glenn, P. & Holt, E.
    (2013) Studies of laughter in interaction. A&C Black. 10.5040/9781472542069
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472542069 [Google Scholar]
56. Grammer, K., & Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
    (1990) The ritualisation of laughter. W. A. Koch (Ed.), Natürlichkeit der Sprache und der Kultur (pp.192–214). Bochum, Germany: Brockmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Greatbatch, D., & Clark, T.
    (2003) Displaying group cohesiveness: Humour and laughter in the public lectures of management gurus. Human relations, 56(12), 1515–1544. 10.1177/00187267035612004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035612004 [Google Scholar]
58. Gregoromichelaki, E., Kempson, R. & Howes, C.
    (2020) Actionism in syntax and semantics. InHowes, C., Dobnik, S. & Breitholtz, E. (editors), Dialogue and Perception – Extended papers from DaP2018. Gothenburg: GUPEA.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Guillory, J., Spiegel, J., Drislane, M., Weiss, B., Donner, W., & Hancock, J.
    (2011) Upset now? Emotion contagion in distributed groups. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp.745–748). 10.1145/1978942.1979049
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979049 [Google Scholar]
60. Haakana, M.
    (2002) Laughter in medical interaction: From quantification to analysis, and back. Journal of Sociolinguistics6.2: 207–235. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00185 [Google Scholar]
61. Hale, J., & Hamilton, A. F.
    (2016) Testing the relationship between mimicry, trust and rapport in virtual reality conversations. Scientific reports, 6, 35295. 10.1038/srep35295
    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35295 [Google Scholar]
62. Ham, J.
    (2022) Influencing Robot Influence: Personalization of Persuasive Robots, Interaction studies – in this volume.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Hanauska, M. and Leßmöllmann, A.
    (2022) Persuasion in Science Communication: empirical findings on scientific weblogs, Interaction studies – in this volume.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hancock, J. T., Gee, K., Ciaccio, K., & Lin, J. M. H.
    (2008) I’m sad you’re sad: emotional contagion in CMC. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp.295–298). 10.1145/1460563.1460611
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460611 [Google Scholar]
65. Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K.
    (2020) AI-mediated communication: definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89–100. 10.1093/jcmc/zmz022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022 [Google Scholar]
66. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. L.
    (1994) Emotional contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Hatfield, E., Bensman, L., Thornton, P. D., & Rapson, R. L.
    (2014) New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. 10.23668/psycharchives.2195
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2195 [Google Scholar]
68. Healey, P. G., Purver, M., King, J., Ginzburg, J., & Mills, G. J.
    (2003) Experimenting with clarification in dialogue. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol.25, No.25).
    [Google Scholar]
69. Healey PGT, Purver M, Howes C
    Healey PGT, Purver M, Howes C (2014) Divergence in Dialogue. PLoS ONE9(6): e98598. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098598
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098598 [Google Scholar]
70. Healey, P. G., Mills, G. J., Eshghi, A., & Howes, C.
    (2018) Running repairs: Coordinating meaning in dialogue. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 367–388. 10.1111/tops.12336
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12336 [Google Scholar]
71. Herring, S.
    (1999) Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication4 (4). 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.1999.tb00106.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x [Google Scholar]
72. Heyes, C.
    (2011) Automatic imitation. Psychological bulletin, 137(3), 463. 10.1037/a0022288
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022288 [Google Scholar]
73. Hodges, B. H.
    (2014) Rethinking conformity and imitation: Divergence, convergence, and social understanding. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 726. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726 [Google Scholar]
74. Hohenstein, J., & Jung, M.
    (2020) AI as a moral crumple zone: The effects of AI-mediated communication on attribution and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 106190. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106190
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106190 [Google Scholar]
75. Holt, E.
    (2011) On the nature of‘laughables’: Laughter as a response to overdone figurative phrases. Pragmatics, 21, (3), 393–410. 10.1075/prag.21.3.05hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.3.05hol [Google Scholar]
76. Holt, E.
    (2013) Conversation analysis and laughter. In: Chapelle, Carol A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell, Chichester, pp.1033e1038.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2002) Speakers’ experiences and audience design: Knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(4), 589–606. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00019‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00019-0 [Google Scholar]
78. Howes, C., Healey, P. G., & Purver, M.
    (2010) Tracking lexical and syntactic alignment in conversation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol.32, No.32).
    [Google Scholar]
79. Jefferson, G.
    (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. InG. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp.79–96.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Jefferson, G.
    (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.346–369.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Kalman, Y. M., & Gergle, D.
    (2014) Letter repetitions in computer-mediated communication?: a unique link between spoken and online language. Computers in Human Behavior. 34, 187–193. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.047
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.047 [Google Scholar]
82. Kalman, Y. M., Scissors, L. E., Gill, A., & Gergle, D.
    (2013) Online chronemics convey social information. Computers in Human Behavior29, 3, 1260–1269. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.036
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.036 [Google Scholar]
83. Kadir, Z. A., Maros, M. & Hamid, B. A.
    (2012) Linguistic features in the online discussion forums. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, vol.2, no.3, pp.276–281.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A.
    (2019) Is psychology suffering from an epidemic of contagion? Moving from metaphors to theoretically derived concepts and methods in the study of social influences. Theory & Psychology, 29(6), 739–756. 10.1177/0959354319857154
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319857154 [Google Scholar]
85. König, K.
    (2019) Stance taking with ‘laugh’ particles and emojis–Sequential and functional patterns of ‘laughter’ in a corpus of German WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 156–170. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008 [Google Scholar]
86. Koudenburg, N., Postmes, T., Gordijn, E. H., & van Mourik Broekman, A.
    (2015) Uniform and complementary social interaction: distinct pathways to solidarity. PloS one, 10(6), e0129061. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129061
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129061 [Google Scholar]
87. Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T.
    (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790. 10.1073/pnas.1320040111
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111 [Google Scholar]
88. La France, M., & Broadbent, M.
    (1976) Group rapport: Posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group and Organization Studies, 1, 328–333. 10.1177/105960117600100307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117600100307 [Google Scholar]
89. Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P.
    (2021) Does it pay to imitate? No evidence for social gains from lexical imitation. Royal Society Open Science. 10.1098/rsos.211107
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211107 [Google Scholar]
90. Liebman, N., & Gergle, D.
    (2016, February). It’s (Not) simply a matter of time: The relationship between CMC cues and interpersonal affinity. Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (pp.570–581). 10.1145/2818048.2819945
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819945 [Google Scholar]
91. Martin, Rod A.
    (2010) The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Matsumoto, D.
    (1987) The role of facial response in the experience of emotion: More methodological problems and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 769–774. 10.1037/0022‑3514.52.4.769
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.769 [Google Scholar]
93. Mazzocconi, C.
    (2019) Laughter in interaction: semantics, pragmatics, and child development. PhD thesis, Universite de Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Mazzocconi, Chiara, Ye Tian & Jonathan Ginzburg
    . What’s your laughter doing there? A taxonomy of the pragmatic functions of laughter, in: IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. 10.1109/TAFFC.2020.2994533
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2020.2994533 [Google Scholar]
95. McGettigan, C., Walsh, E., Jessop, R., Agnew, Z. K., Sauter, D. A., Warren, J. E., & Scott, S. K.
    (2015) Individual differences in laughter perception reveal roles for mentalizing and sensorimotor systems in the evaluation of emotional authenticity. Cerebral cortex, 25(1), 246–257. 10.1093/cercor/bht227
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht227 [Google Scholar]
96. McKay, I.
    (2015) Laughing with letters: A corpus investigation of written laughter on Twitter. BA Thesis. University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
97. McKay, I.
    (2020) Some distributional patterns in the use of typed laughter-derived expressions on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 166, 97–113. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.009 [Google Scholar]
98. McSweeney, Michelle A.
    (2016) Lol! I Didn’t Mean it: Lol as a Marker of Illocutionary Force. LSA, Austin, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
99. McVeigh-Schultz, J., & Isbister, K.
    (2021) The Case for Weird Social in VR/XR: A Vision of Social Superpowers Beyond Meatspace. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference. 10.1145/3411763.3450377
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450377 [Google Scholar]
100. Mills, G.
     (2011) The emergence of procedural conventions in dialogue. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol.33, No.33).
     [Google Scholar]
101. Mills, G. J.
     (2014) Dialogue in joint activity: Complementarity, convergence and conventionalization. New ideas in psychology, 32, 158–173. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.006 [Google Scholar]
102. Mills, G. J., Purver, M., and Healey, P. G.
     (2013) A dialogue experimentation toolkit. https://dialoguetoolkit.github.io/chattool/
103. Nguyen, D. T., & Fussell, S. R.
     (2014) Lexical cues of interaction involvement in dyadic instant messaging conversations. Discourse Processes, 51(5–6), 468–493. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.912544
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.912544 [Google Scholar]
104. Owren, M. J., & Bachorowski, J.-A.
     (2001) The evolution of emotional experience: A selfish-gene account of smiling and laughter in early hominids and humans. InT. J. Mayne & G. A. Bonanno (Eds.), Emotions: Current issues and future directions (pp.152–191). Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Petitjean, C., Mo, E.
     (2017) Hahaha: laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations. Journal of Pragmatics110, 1e19. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
106. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
     (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and brain sciences, 27(2), 169–190. 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
107. Plessner, Helmuth
     (1970) Laughing and crying: a study of the limits of human behavior. Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Provine, R. R.
     (1992) Contagious laughter: Laughter is a sufficient stimulus for laughs and smiles. In: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society30.1, pp.1–4. 10.3758/BF03330380
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330380 [Google Scholar]
109. Provine, R. R.
     (1993) Laughter punctuates speech: Linguistic, social and gender contexts of laughter. In: Ethology95.4, pp.291–298. 10.1111/j.1439‑0310.1993.tb00478.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00478.x [Google Scholar]
110. Provine, R. R.
     (2001) Laughter: A scientific investigation. Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Provine, R. R. & Fischer, K. R.
     (1989) Laughing, smiling, and talking: Relation to sleeping and social context in humans. In: Ethology83.4, pp.295–305. 10.1111/j.1439‑0310.1989.tb00536.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1989.tb00536.x [Google Scholar]
112. Rader, E., & Gray, R.
     (2015) Understanding user beliefs about algorithmic curation in the Facebook news feed. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp.173–182). 10.1145/2702123.2702174
     https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702174 [Google Scholar]
113. Reddy, V., Williams, E., & Vaughan, A.
     (2002) Sharing humour and laughter in autism and Down’s syndrome. British Journal of Psychology93.2, pp.219–242. 10.1348/000712602162553
     https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162553 [Google Scholar]
114. Reed, B. S.
     (2020) Reconceptualizing mirroring: Sound imitation and rapport in naturally occurring interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 167, 131–151. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.010 [Google Scholar]
115. Rizzolatti, G.
     (2004) The mirror-neuron system and imitation. Perspectives on Imitation: From Mirror Neurons to Memes, ed.S. Hurley, N. Chater. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Rizzolatti, G.
     (2005) The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210(5–6), 419–421. 10.1007/s00429‑005‑0039‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-005-0039-z [Google Scholar]
117. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L.
     (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 [Google Scholar]
118. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V.
     (1999) Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 137, 85–100.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Roberts, G., Langstein, B., & Galantucci, B.
     (2016) (In) sensitivity to incoherence in human communication. Language & Communication, 47, 15–22. 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.11.001 [Google Scholar]
120. Rorschach, H.
     (1927) Rorschach Test – Psychodiagnostic Plates. Ca
     [Google Scholar]
121. Ross, M. D., Owren, M. J. & Zimmermann, E.
     (2009) Reconstructing the evolution of laughter in great apes and humans. Current Biology19.13, pp.1106–1111. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.028
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.028 [Google Scholar]
122. Ross, M. D., Owren, M. J. & Zimmermann, E.
     (2010) The evolution of laughter in great apes and humans. Communicative & integrative biology3.2, pp.191–194. 10.4161/cib.3.2.10944
     https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.3.2.10944 [Google Scholar]
123. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B.
     (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and social psychology review, 5(4), 296–320. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2 [Google Scholar]
124. Ruch, W., & Ekman, P.
     (2001) The expressive pattern of laughter. Emotion, qualia, and consciousness, pp.426–443. 10.1142/9789812810687_0033
     https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812810687_0033 [Google Scholar]
125. Scheflen, A. E.
     (1964) The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27, 316–331. 10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403 [Google Scholar]
126. Schegloff, E. A.
     (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I (Vol.1). Cambridge university press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
127. Sherman, J. W. & Rivers, A. M.
     (2021) There’s Nothing Social about Social Priming: Derailing the Train Wreck, Psychological Inquiry, 32:1, 1–11. 10.1080/1047840X.2021.1889312
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2021.1889312 [Google Scholar]
128. Scott, S. K., Sauter, D. & McGettigan, C.
     (2010) Brain mechanisms for processing perceived emotional vocalizations in humans. Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience. Vol.19. Elsevier, pp.187–197.
     [Google Scholar]
129. Scott, S. K., Lavan, N., Chen, S., & McGettigan, C.
     (2014) The social life of laughter. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(12), 618–620. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.002 [Google Scholar]
130. Scott, S. K., Young, A. W., Calder, A. J., Hellawell, D. J., Aggleton, J. P., & Johnsons, M.
     (1997) Impaired auditory recognition of fear and anger following bilateral amygdala lesions. Nature, 385(6613), 254–257. 10.1038/385254a0
     https://doi.org/10.1038/385254a0 [Google Scholar]
131. Sidi, Y., Glikson, E., & Cheshin, A.
     (2021) Do You Get What I Mean?!? The Undesirable Outcomes of (Ab) Using Paralinguistic Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 1337. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658844
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658844 [Google Scholar]
132. Smoski, M., & Bachorowski, J. A.
     (2003) Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 327–340. 10.1080/02699930302296
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302296 [Google Scholar]
133. Strupka, E., Niebuhr, O., & Fischer, K.
     (2016) Influence of robot gender and speaker gender on prosodic entrainment in HRI. Interactive Session at the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2016), New York City.
     [Google Scholar]
134. Tian, Y., Mazzocconi, C., & Ginzburg, J.
     (2016) When do we laugh?. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (pp.360–369). 10.18653/v1/W16‑3645
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-3645 [Google Scholar]
135. Varnhagen, C. K., McFall, G. P., Pugh, N., Routledge, L., Sumida-MacDonald, H., & Kwong, T. E.
     (2010) Lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and writing, 23(6), 719–733. 10.1007/s11145‑009‑9181‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y [Google Scholar]
136. Vinton, K. L.
     (1989) Humor in the workplace: It is more than telling jokes. Small group behavior, 20(2), 151–166. 10.1177/104649648902000202
     https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648902000202 [Google Scholar]
137. Walther, J. B.
     (2007) Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior. 23, 2538–2557. 10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 [Google Scholar]
138. Walther, J. B.
     (2016) Social information processing theory (CMC), The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, edsC. R. Berger and M. E. Roloff (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 1–13. 10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic192
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic192 [Google Scholar]
139. Warren, J. E., Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Wiland, J., Dresner, M. A., Wise, R. J., Rosen, S., & Scott, S. K.
     (2006) Positive emotions preferentially engage an auditory–motor “mirror” system. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(50), 13067–13075. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907‑06.2006
     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907-06.2006 [Google Scholar]
140. Young, R. D., and Frye, M.
     (1966) Some are laughing; some are not – why?Psycholigcal Reports18, 747–754. 10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.747
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.747 [Google Scholar]
141. Zhang, L., & Healey, P. G.
     (2018) Human, Chameleon or Nodding Dog?. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp.428–436). 10.1145/3242969.3242998
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242998 [Google Scholar]
142. Ziembowicz, K., & Nowak, A.
     (2019) Prosody of Text Communication? How to Induce Synchronization and Coherence in Chat Conversations. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(17), 1586–1595. 10.1080/10447318.2018.1556894
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1556894 [Google Scholar]