How do technological properties influence user affordance of wearable technologies?

References

1. Bernardo, M., Marimon, F., & Alonso-Almeida, M.
   (2012) Functional quality and hedonic quality: A study of the dimensions of e-service quality in online travel agencies. Information & Management, 49, 342–347. 10.1016/j.im.2012.06.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.06.005 [Google Scholar]
2. Bhattacherjee, A.
   (2001) Understanding information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. 10.2307/3250921
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921 [Google Scholar]
3. Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A.
   (2014, April). Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. InProceedings of the 32nd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1143–1152). ACM.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chemero, A.
   (2003) Radical empiricism through the ages. Contemporary Psychology, 48, 18–20.
   [Google Scholar]
5. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R.
   (2004) Measuring e-commerce success. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31–47. 10.1080/10864415.2004.11044317
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2004.11044317 [Google Scholar]
6. DiClemente, C. C., Marinilli, A. S., Singh, M., & Bellino, L. E.
   (2001) The role of feedback in the process of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(3), 217–227. 10.5993/AJHB.25.3.8
   https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.25.3.8 [Google Scholar]
7. Evans, S., Pearce, K., & Vitak, J.
   (2017) Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1) 35–52. 10.1111/jcc4.12180
   https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180 [Google Scholar]
8. Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K.
   (2016) A macro model of online information quality perceptions: A review and synthesis of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 972–991. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.027
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.027 [Google Scholar]
9. Gimpel, H., & Niben, M.
   (2013) Quantifying the quantified self: A study on the motivation of patients to track their own health. Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, Italy, Dec. 2013.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Haddadi, H., Mortier, R., McAuley, D., & Crowcroft, J.
    (2013) Human-data interaction. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hou, J., Nam, Y., Peng, W., & Lee, K.
    (2012) Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players’ immersion tendencies on game experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 617–623. 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.007 [Google Scholar]
12. Huang, T. & Liao, S.
    (2015) A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295. doi:  10.1007/s10660‑014‑9163‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2 [Google Scholar]
13. Hsu, P., Yen, H., & Chung, J.
    (2016) Assessing ERP post-implementation success at the individual level. Information & Management, 52(8), 925–942. 10.1016/j.im.2015.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.06.009 [Google Scholar]
14. Karanam, Y., Filko, L., Kaser, L., Alotaibi, H., Makhsoom, E., & Voida, S.
    (2014) Motivational affordances and personality types in personal informatics. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, p.79–82. doi: > 10.1145/2638728.2638800
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2638800 [Google Scholar]
15. Khorakhun, C., & Bhatti, S.
    (2015, October). mHealth through quantified-self: a user study. HealthCom 2015. 17th IEEE International Conference on eHealth Networking, Applications, and Services. Boston, MA, USA, October 2015 10.1109/HealthCom.2015.7454520
    https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2015.7454520 [Google Scholar]
16. Kim, J.
    (2016) Interacting socially with the Internet of Things (IoT): Effects of source attribution and specialization in human–IoT interaction. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 21, 420–435. 10.1111/jcc4.12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12177 [Google Scholar]
17. Komiak, S.
    (2010) The effects of perceived information quality and perceived system quality on trust and adoption of online reputation systems. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 343. aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/343
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lee, K., Lee, S., & Hwang, Y.
    (2014) The impact of hyperlink affordance, psychological reactance, and perceived business tie on trust transfer. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 110–120. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.003 [Google Scholar]
19. Li, I., Medynskjy, Y., Froehlich, J., & Larsen, J.
    (2012) Personal informatics in practice: Improving quality of life through data. InCHI 2012, May5–10 2012, Austin, TX, USA. 10.1145/2212776.2212724
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212724 [Google Scholar]
20. Mondi, M., Woods, P. & A. Rafi
    (2008) A uses and gratification expectancy model to predict students’ perceived e-learning experience. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (2), 241–261.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Oliver, R. L.
    (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. 10.2307/3150499
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499 [Google Scholar]
22. Park, E., & Sundar, S.
    (2015) Can synchronicity and visual modality enhance social presence in mobile messaging?Computers in Human Behavior, 45,121–128. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
23. Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., & Krcmar, H.
    (2011, June). Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (pp.21–30). ACM. 10.1145/2103354.2103358
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2103354.2103358 [Google Scholar]
24. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C., & Martinez, F. J.
    (2006) Understanding E-learning continuance intention. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 [Google Scholar]
25. See-To, E., & Ho, K.
    (2016) A study on the impact of design attributes on E-payment service utility. Information & Management, 53(5), 668–681. 10.1016/j.im.2016.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.004 [Google Scholar]
26. Shin, D.
    (2009) Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: An implication for IP-based technologies. Information and Management, 46(1), 16–22. doi:  10.1016/j.im.2008.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.05.004 [Google Scholar]
27. Shin, D.
    (2014) Measuring the quality of smartphones: Development of a customer satisfaction index for smart devices. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 12(4), 311–327. doi:  10.1504/IJMC.2014.063650
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2014.063650 [Google Scholar]
28. Shin, D., Lee, S., & Hwang, Y.
    (2017) How do credibility and utility affect the user experience of health informatics services?Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 292–302. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.007 [Google Scholar]
29. Shin, D., & Biocca, F.
    (2017) Health experience model of personal informatics: The case of a quantified self. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 62–74. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.019 [Google Scholar]
30. Shin, D.
    (2016) Cross-platform users’ experiences toward designing interusable systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(7), 503–514. 10.1080/10447318.2016.1177277
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1177277 [Google Scholar]
31. Shin, D., Choi, M., Kim, J., & Lee, J.
    (2016) Interaction, engagement, and perceived interactivity in single-handed interaction. Internet Research, 26(5), 1134–1157. doi:  10.1108/IntR‑12‑2014‑0312
    https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2014-0312 [Google Scholar]
32. Shin, D.
    (2015) Quality of experience: Beyond the user experience of smart services. Total Quality Management, 26 (8), 919–932. 10.1080/14783363.2014.912037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.912037 [Google Scholar]
33. Shin, D.
    (2011) Understanding e-book users: Uses and gratification expectancy model. New Media and Society, 13(2), 260–278. 10.1177/1461444810372163
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810372163 [Google Scholar]
34. Spreng, R. A., & Chiou, S.
    (2002) A cross-cultural assessment of the satisfaction formation process. European Journal of Marketing, 36(8), 829–840. 10.1108/03090560210430827
    https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210430827 [Google Scholar]
35. Thatcher, J., & P. L. Perrewe
    (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381–96. 10.2307/4132314
    https://doi.org/10.2307/4132314 [Google Scholar]
36. Vishwanath, A.
    (2016) Mobile device affordance: explicating how smartphones influence the outcome of phishing attacks. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 198–207. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.035
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.035 [Google Scholar]
37. Vugt, H., Hoorn, J., Konjin, E., & Dimitriadou, A.
    (2006) Affective affordances: Improving interface character engagement through interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 874–888. doi:  10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.04.008 [Google Scholar]
38. Wang, Y., Weber, I., & Mitra, P.
    (2016) Quantified self meets social media: Sharing of weight updates on Twitter. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Health Conference, p.93–97. 10.1145/2896338.2896363
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2896338.2896363 [Google Scholar]
39. Yoon, D., & Youn, S.
    (2016) Brand experience on the website. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 16(1), 1–15. doi:  10.1080/15252019.2015.1136249
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2015.1136249 [Google Scholar]