1887
Volume 19, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

To advance understanding of the mechanisms allowing for team coordination (TC) in complex motor actions, we conducted a qualitative study with eight elite hand-to-hand circus acrobats. Data collection consisted of field observations, an open-ended interview with the participants’ head coach, and focus group interviews with all acrobats. Data analysis yielded three higher order themes: TC, collective efficacy (CE), and TC-CE linkage. Teammates’ shared and complementary mental models, as well as implicit and explicit communication dynamics, emerged as formative sub-themes of TC; self-efficacy and other’s-efficacy emerged as reflective sub-themes of CE. Our findings also suggest that TC is likely inter-related to CE in a systemic fashion. Practitioners should encourage the development of both shared and complementary models of thinking, while promoting verbal and non-verbal communication skills. Finally, increasing teammates’ confidence in themselves and in their teammates can help in the development of CE as well as the enhancement of TC.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.16035.fil
2019-03-13
2019-12-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arrow, H., Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R.
    (2004) Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73–105. doi:  10.1177/1046496403259757
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403259757 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atik, Y.
    (1994) The conductor and the orchestra: Interactive aspects of the leadership process. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 15, 22–28. 10.1108/01437739410050123
    https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739410050123 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, A.
    (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bietti, L. M., & Sutton, J.
    (2015) Interacting to remember at multiple timescales: Coordination, collaboration, cooperation and culture in joint remembering. Interaction Studies, 16, 419–450. 10.1075/is.16.3.04bie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.04bie [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloom, B. S.
    (Ed) (1985) Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:  10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruun, D. M., Krustrup, P., Hornstrup, T., Uth, J., Brasso, K., Rørth, M., … & Midtgaard, J.
    (2014) “All boys and men can play football”: A qualitative investigation of recreational football in prostate cancer patients. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24, 113–121. 10.1111/sms.12193
    https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12193 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G.
    (2007) Psychophysiological science: Interdisciplinary approaches to classic questions about the mind. InJ. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511546396.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546396.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carron, A. V., Eys, M. A., & Burke, S. M.
    (2007) Team cohesion: nature, correlates, and development. InS. Jowette, & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp.91e102). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carron, A. V., & Spink, K. S.
    (1993) Team building in an exercise setting. The Sport Psychologist, 7, 8–18. 10.1123/tsp.7.1.8
    https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.7.1.8 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chomsky, N.
    (2014) Aspects of the theory of syntax (Vol.11). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins, J., & Durand-Bush, N.
    (2015) Frameworks of team processes in sport: A critical review with implications for practitioners. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 3, 46–59. doi:  10.13189/saj.2015.030304
    https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2015.030304 [Google Scholar]
  13. Coyle, A.
    (2010) Qualitative research and anomalous experience: a call for interpretative pluralism. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7, 79–83. doi:  10.1080/14780880903304600.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903304600 [Google Scholar]
  14. DeLong, C., Pathak, N., Erickson, K., Perrino, E., Shim, K., & Srivastava, J.
    (2011) Team Skill: modeling team chemistry in online multi-player games. InJ. Huang, L. Cao, & J. Srivastava (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining (pp.519–531). Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑20847‑8_43
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20847-8_43 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunbar, R. I.
    (2009) The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36, 562–572. doi:  10.1080/03014460902960289
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460902960289 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eccles, D.
    (2010) The coordination of labour in sports teams. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 154–170. doi:  10.1080/1750984X.2010.519400
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2010.519400 [Google Scholar]
  17. Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G.
    (2004) Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 542–560. 10.1123/jsep.26.4.542
    https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.4.542 [Google Scholar]
  18. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H.
    (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. 10.1111/j.1365‑2648.2007.04569.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J.
    (2008) Self-efficacy in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Filho, E.
    (2015) “Team chemistry” through chemistry lenses: Interdisciplinary science or a metaphorical conundrum?Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00038
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00038 [Google Scholar]
  21. Filho, E., Aubertin, P., & Petiot, B.
    (2016) The making of expert performers at Cirque du Soleil and the National Circus School: A performance enhancement outlook. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 7, 68–79. 10.1080/21520704.2016.1138266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2016.1138266 [Google Scholar]
  22. Filho, E., Bertollo, M., Robazza, C., & Comani, S.
    (2015b) The juggling paradigm: A novel social neuroscience approach to identify neuropsychophysiological markers of team mental models. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00799
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00799 [Google Scholar]
  23. Filho, E., Gershgoren, L., Basevitch, I., Schinke, R., & Tenenbaum, G.
    (2014) Peer leadership and shared mental models in a college volleyball team: A season long case study. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 8, 184–203. 10.1123/jcsp.2014‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2014-0021 [Google Scholar]
  24. Filho, E., & Rettig, J.
    (2016) Intergroup conflict management strategies from a Nobel Peace Laureate: The case of Jose Ramos-Horta. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38, 351–361. 10.1080/01973533.2016.1221348
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1221348 [Google Scholar]
  25. Filho, E., & Tenenbaum, G.
    (2012) Team mental models in sports: An overview. InR. Schinke (Ed.), Athletic insight’s writings in sport psychology. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2015) Sports psychology. Oxford bibliographies. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/obo/9780199828340‑0175
    https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0175 [Google Scholar]
  27. Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G., & Yang, Y.
    (2015a) Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: Towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33, 641–653. doi:  10.1080/02640414.2014.957714
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.957714 [Google Scholar]
  28. Garud, R.
    (1997) On the distinction between know-how, know-what, and know-why. Advances in Strategic Management, 14, 81–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gershgoren, L., Basevitch, I., Filho, E., Gershgoren, A., Brill, Y. S., Schinke, R. J., & Tenenbaum, G.
    (2016) Expertise in soccer teams: A thematic inquiry into the role of shared mental models within team chemistry. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 128–139. doi:  10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gershgoren, L., Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G., & Schinke, R. J.
    (2013) Coaching shared mental models in soccer: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 7, 293–312. 10.1123/jcsp.7.4.293
    https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.7.4.293 [Google Scholar]
  31. Giske, R., Rodahl, S. E., & Høigaard, R.
    (2015) Shared mental task models in elite ice hockey and handball teams: Does it exist and how does the coach intervene to make an impact?Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27, 20–34. 10.1080/10413200.2014.940431
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2014.940431 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gold, R. L.
    (1958) Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 217–223. 10.2307/2573808
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2573808 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R.
    (2005) A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269–287. 10.5465/amr.2005.16387885
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387885 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hiller, N. J., DeChurch, L. A., Murase, T., & Doty, D.
    (2011) Searching for outcomes of leadership: A 25-year review. Journal of Management, 37, 1137–1177. doi:  10.1177/0149206310393520
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310393520 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoyle, R. H.
    (2011) Structural equation modeling for social and personality psychology. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781446287965
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287965 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E.
    (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. 10.1177/1049732305276687
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kelso, J. A. S.
    (2012) Multistability and metastability: Understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 906–918. doi:  10.1098/rstb.2011.0351
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0351 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kincheloe, J.
    (2005) On to the next level: continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 323–350. 10.1177/1077800405275056
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056 [Google Scholar]
  39. Klein, G.
    (2000) Cognitive task analysis of teams. InJ. M. Schraagen, S. F. Chipman, & V. L. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive task analysis (pp.417–430). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S.
    (1994) Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?Journal of Management, 20, 403–437. doi:  10.1016/0149‑2063(94)90021‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90021-3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lefebvre, A.
    (2016) The coordination of moves in Aikido interaction. Gesture, 15, 123–155. 10.1075/gest.15.2.01lef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.2.01lef [Google Scholar]
  42. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J.
    (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376. 10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785 [Google Scholar]
  43. Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C.
    (2009) Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 320–339. doi:  10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2009.01022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.
    (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. doi:  10.1037/0021‑9010.85.2.273
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273 [Google Scholar]
  45. McNeill, D.
    (2008) Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ménard, J. F., & Hallé, M.
    (2014) Circus also needs performance psychology: Facts and realities of consulting at Cirque du Soleil. InJ. G. Cremades & L. S. Tashman (Eds.), Becoming a sport, exercise, and performance psychology professional: A global perspective. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K.
    (2006) Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: Implications for research design. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12, 8–13. 10.1111/j.1440‑172X.2006.00543.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00543.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K.
    (2010) Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi:  10.1177/0149206309356804
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309356804 [Google Scholar]
  50. Patton, M. Q.
    (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Peterson, E., Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., & Burr, R.
    (2000) Collective efficacy and aspects of shared mental models as predictors of performance over time in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 296–316. doi:  10.1177/1368430200033005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200033005 [Google Scholar]
  52. Reimer, T., Park, E. S., & Hinsz, V. B.
    (2006) Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: An information‐processing perspective for team sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 376–400. doi:  10.1080/1612197X.2006.9671804
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2006.9671804 [Google Scholar]
  53. Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Burke, C. S., Goodwin, G. F., & Fiore, S.
    (2006) The making of a dream team: When expert teams do best. InK. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp.439–453). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816796.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.025 [Google Scholar]
  54. Short, S. E., Sullivan, P., & Feltz, D. L.
    (2005) Development and preliminary validation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9, 181–202. 10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_3 [Google Scholar]
  55. Silva, P., Garganta, J., Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Aguiar, P.
    (2013) Shared knowledge or shared affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Medicine, 43, 765–772. doi:  10.1007/s40279‑013‑0070‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0070-9 [Google Scholar]
  56. Simons, M., de Vet, E., Hoornstra, S., Brug, J., Seidell, J., & Chinapaw, M.
    (2012) Adolescents’ views on active and non-active videogames: a focus group study. Games for Health, 1, 211–218. 10.1089/g4h.2011.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2011.0032 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B.
    (2014) Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: From process to product. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Streeck, J.
    (2015) Embodiment in human communication. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 419–438. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102214‑014045
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014045 [Google Scholar]
  59. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. M.
    (1996) Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452243641
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243641 [Google Scholar]
  60. Vilar, L., Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Button, C.
    (2012) The role of ecological dynamics in analysing performance in team sports. Sports Medicine, 42, 1–10. 10.2165/11596520‑000000000‑00000
    https://doi.org/10.2165/11596520-000000000-00000 [Google Scholar]
  61. Willig, C., & Stainton-Rogers, W.
    (Eds.) (2007) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wood, H.
    (2003) Space-time continuum. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4. doi:  10.1038/nrn1110
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1110 [Google Scholar]
  63. Xinwen, B., Erping, W., Ying, Z., Dafei, M., & Jing, R.
    (2006) Developmental characteristics of two types of shared mental models. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 598.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.16035.fil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.16035.fil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): collective efficacy , dyadic teams , group dynamics , shared mental models and team coordination

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error