Volume 17, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


To date research investigating the potential of Robot-Mediated Interviews (RMI) has focused on establishing how children respond to robots in an interview scenario. In order to test if an RMI approach would work in a real world setting, it is important to establish what the experts (e.g. specialist child interviewers) would require from such a system. To determine the needs of such expert users we conducted three user panels with groups of potential real world users to gather their views of our current system and find out what they would require for the system to be useful to them. The user groups consisted of specialist police officers, intermediaries, educational specialists and healthcare specialists. To our knowledge this is the first article investigating user needs for Robot-Mediated Interviews. Due to the novelty of this area, the work presented in this paper is exploratory in nature. The results provide valuable insights into what real world users would need from a Robot-Mediated Interviewing system. Our findings will contribute to future research and technology development in the domain of RMI in particular, and child-robot interaction in general.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aldebaran Robotics
    Aldebaran Robotics. www.aldebaran-robotics.com/
  2. Aldridge, M. , & Wood, J.
    (1998) Interviewing Children: A Guide for Child Care and Forensic Practitioners. Wiley Series in Child Care and Protection: ERIC.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlett, B. , Estivill-Castro, V. , & Seymon, S.
    (2004) Dogs or robots – Why do children see them as robotic pets rather than canine machines?Paper presented atthe 5th Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC2004).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bethel, C. L. , Eakin, D. K. , Anreddy, S. , Stuart, J. K. , & Carruth, D.
    (2013) Eyewitnesses are misled by human but not robot interviewers. Paper presented at theProceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483498
    https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483498 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bethel, C. L. , Stevenson, M. R. , & Scassellati, B.
    (2011) Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult. Paper presented at theSystems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011 IEEE International Conference on.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradfield, A. L. , & Wells, G. L.
    (2000) The perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: A test of the five Biggers criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 581–594.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Braun, V. , & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassell, S. , & Paul, M. H.
    (1967) The role of puppet therapy on the emotional responses of children hospitalized for cardiac catheterization. The Journal of Pediatrics, 71(2), 233–239. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑3476(67)80078‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(67)80078-7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Doherty-Sneddon, G.
    (2004) Don’t look now… I’m trying to think. The Psychologist, 17(2), 82–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekman, P.
    (2003) Darwin, deception, and facial expression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1000(1), 205–221. doi: 10.1196/annals.1280.010
    https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1280.010 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilbert, N.
    (2008) Researching social life: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gurney, D. J. , Vekaria, K. N. , & Howlett, N.
    (2013) A Nod in the Wrong Direction: Does Non-verbal Feedback Affect Eyewitness Confidence in Interviews?1. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law(ahead-of-print), 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ISO, I.
    (1999) 13407: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. Geneva: ISO.
  14. Jones, L. , Bellis, M. A. , Wood, S. , Hughes, K. , McCoy, E. , Eckley, L. , et al.
    (2012) Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. The Lancet. doi: 10.1016/S0140‑6736(12)60692‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60692-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kozima, H. , Michalowski, M. , & Nakagawa, C.
    (2009) Keepon: A Playful Robot for Research, Therapy, and Entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1007/s12369‑008‑0009‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0009-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Krauss, R. M.
    (1998) Why do we gesture when we speak?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 54–60. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8721.ep13175642
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175642 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kruijff-Korbayová, I. , Athanasopoulos, G. , Beck, A. , Cosi, P. , Cuayáhuitl, H. , Dekens, T. , et al.
    (2011) An event-based conversational system for the Nao robot. Paper presented at theProceedings of the Paralinguistic Information and its Integration in Spoken Dialogue Systems Workshop. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑1335‑6_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1335-6_14 [Google Scholar]
  18. McCarthy, M. , & Thompson, D.
    (1997) A prevalence study of sexual abuse of adults with intellectual disabilities referred for sex education. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(2), 105–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑3148.1997.tb00012.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1997.tb00012.x [Google Scholar]
  19. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mencap
    Mencap (1999) Submission to the Sex Offences Review.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Norman, D. A. , & Draper, S. W.
    (1986) User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  22. Poole, D. A. , & Lamb, M. E.
    (1998) Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10301‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10301-000 [Google Scholar]
  23. Robins, B. , Dautenhahn, K. , & Dickerson, P.
    (2009, February1–7). From isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. Paper presented at theProc. the Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI 09, Cancun, Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Saldien, J. , Goris, K. , Yilmazyildiz, S. , Verhelst, W. , & Lefeber, D.
    (2008) On the design of the huggable robot probo. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(2), 3–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Scaife, M. , Rogers, Y. , Aldrich, F. , & Davies, M.
    (1997) Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. Paper presented at theProceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. doi: 10.1145/258549.258789
    https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258789 [Google Scholar]
  26. Shapiro, D. E.
    (1995) Puppet modeling technique for children undergoing stressful medical procedures: Tips for clinicians. International Journal of Play Therapy, 4(2), 31. doi: 10.1037/h0089146
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0089146 [Google Scholar]
  27. Turk, V. , & Brown, H.
    (1993) The sexual abuse of adults with learning disabilites: results of a two year incidence survey. Mental Handicap Research, 6(3), 193–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑3148.1993.tb00053.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1993.tb00053.x [Google Scholar]
  28. UK Government
    UK Government (2011) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. UK Government
    UK Government (2007) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Using Special Measures.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wainer, J. , Dautenhahn, K. , Robins, B. , & Amirabdollahian, F.
    (2014) A pilot study with a novel setup for collaborative play of the humanoid robot KASPAR with children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(1), 45–65. doi: 10.1007/s12369‑013‑0195‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0195-x [Google Scholar]
  31. Wood, L. J. , Dautenhahn, K. , Lehmann, H. , Robins, B. , Rainer, A. , & Syrdal, D. S.
    (2013a) Robot-Mediated Interviews: Do robots possess advantages over human interviewers when talking to children with special needs?Paper presented at theInternational Conference on Social Robotics.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2013b) Robot-Mediated Interviews: Does a robotic interviewer impact question difficulty and information recovery?Paper presented at the12th European AAATE Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wood, L. J. , Dautenhahn, K. , Rainer, A. , Robins, B. , Lehmann, H. , & Syrdal, D. S.
    (2013) Robot-Mediated Interviews-How Effective Is a Humanoid Robot as a Tool for Interviewing Young Children?PLOS ONE, 8(3), e59448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059448
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059448 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error