1887
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the gender and/or age of interviewees in dyadic interviews influences frequency of speech interruption of young female interviewers. Forty female students at King Faisal University (KFU) and forty interviewees participated in the study. The author compared the number of interruptions per ten minutes of conversation made by interviewees belonging to four categories: young females, young males, older females, and older males. The author hypothesized that older male interviewees interrupt young female interviewers more than younger male and female interviewees. Additionally, the author hypothesized that older female interviewees interrupt young female interviewers more than young female interviewees. The results did not support the hypothesis that males interrupt females more often. Female participants made significantly more interruptions than male participants. The data do not support the hypothesis that older interviewees interrupt their interviewers more frequently than younger interviewees.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.17011.alm
2020-05-20
2020-09-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brooks, V. R.
    (1982) Sex differences in student dominance behavior in female and male professors’ classrooms. Sex Roles, 8, 683–690. 10.1007/BF00287565
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287565 [Google Scholar]
  2. Coates, J.
    (1996) Gesprächsduette unter Frauen. InS. Trömel-Plötz (Ed.), Frauengespräche: Sprache der Verständigung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2004) Women, men and language (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Ruback, R. B.
    (1984) Vocal patterns in male and female groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin10, 518–525. 10.1177/0146167284104004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167284104004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Eakins, B., & Eakins, G.
    (1979) Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. InB. Dubois & I. Crouch (Eds.), The sociology of the languages of American women (pp.53–62). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Edelsky, C.
    (1981) Who’s got the floor?Language in Society, 10, 383–421. 10.1017/S004740450000885X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450000885X [Google Scholar]
  7. Fei, Z.
    (2010) An analysis of gender differences in interruption based on the American TV series “Friends.” Retrieved fromwww.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:395161/FULLTEXT01.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferguson, N.
    (1977) Simultaneous speech, interruptions, and dominance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 295–302. 10.1111/j.2044‑8260.1977.tb00235.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1977.tb00235.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Frank, K.
    (1992) Sprachgewalt: Die sprachliche Reproduktion der Geschlechterhierarchie – Elemente einer feministischen Linguistik im Kontext sozialwissenschaftlicher Frauenforschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111709109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111709109 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gunnarsson, B.
    (1997) Women and men in the academic discourse community. Communicating Gender in Context, 219–247. 10.1075/pbns.42.11gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.42.11gun [Google Scholar]
  11. Holmes, J.
    (1995) Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. T.
    (1983) A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47(1), 45–58. doi:  10.1080/10570318309374104
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374104 [Google Scholar]
  13. Köktürk, S. & Öztürk, E.
    (2012) Forms and multifunctionality of interruptions and simultaneous speaking in ordinary talk – Proposal of a universal model for the evaluation of interruptive speech sequences. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 551–571. 10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2137
    https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2137 [Google Scholar]
  14. Labov, W.
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LaFrance, M., & Carmen, B.
    (1980) The nonverbal display of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 36–49. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.38.1.36
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.36 [Google Scholar]
  16. Leet-Pellegrini, H. M.
    (1980) Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. InH. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp.97–104). New York: Pergamon Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑024696‑3.50020‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-024696-3.50020-X [Google Scholar]
  17. Levinson, St. C., & Torreira, F.
    (2015) Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731 [Google Scholar]
  18. Marche, T. A., & Peterson, C.
    (1993) The development and sex-related use of interruption behavior. Human Communication Research, 19, 388–408. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1993.tb00307.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00307.x [Google Scholar]
  19. McLachlan, A.
    (1991) The effects of agreement, disagreement, gender and familiarity on patterns of dyadic interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 205–212. 10.1177/0261927X91103004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X91103004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Putri, A. L.
    (2014) A sociopragmatic analysis on interruptions performed by the male characters in New Girl season 2 TV series. (Unpublished thesis). Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta.
  21. Rosenbaum, M. E.
    (1986) The repulsion hypothesis: On the non-development of relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156–1166. 10.1037/0022‑3514.51.6.1156
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1156 [Google Scholar]
  22. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Shaw, S.
    (2002) Language and gender in political debates in the House of Commons. (PhD thesis). Institute of Education, University of London, London.
  24. Simkins-Bullock, J. A. & Wildman, B. G.
    (1991) An investigation into the relationships between gender and language. Sex Roles, 24, 149–160. 10.1007/BF00288888
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288888 [Google Scholar]
  25. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Levinson, S. C.
    (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  26. Tannen, D.
    (1993) Rethinking power & solidarity in gender and dominance. InD. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp.165–188). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Thimm, C.
    (1990) Dominanz und Sprache. Strategisches Handeln im Alltag. Wiesbaden: DUV.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wareing, S.
    (2004) Language and gender. InL. Thomas, I. Wareing, J. Singh, S. Peccei, J. Thornborrow & J. Jones (Eds.), Language, society and power: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp.75–92). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wilson, M., & Wilson, T. P.
    (2005) An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 957–968. 10.3758/BF03206432
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206432 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wilson, T. P., & Zimmerman, D. H.
    (1986) The structure of silence between turns in two-party conversation. Discourse Process, 9, 375–390. 10.1080/01638538609544649
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538609544649 [Google Scholar]
  31. Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C.
    (1975) Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. InT. Barry & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: difference and dominance (pp.105–129). Rowely, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zouch, A.
    (2016) Interruption and gender in academic group discussions: Tunisian undergraduates as a case study. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 9(2), 445–460.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.17011.alm
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.17011.alm
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dominance , interruption , language and gender , language variation and turn-taking

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error