1887
Volume 19, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that an important component of the language-ready brain is the ability to recognize and conceptualize events. By ‘event’, I mean any situation or activity in the world or our mental life, that we find salient enough to individuate as a thought or word. While this may sound either trivial or non-unique to humans, I hope to show that abstracting away events and their participants from the embodied flow of experience is a characteristic unique to humans. This ability is enabled, I will argue, by two critical competencies that act as scaffolds for language-ready thought in the prehuman brain. The first, as argued by Arbib (200620122016) and others, is a sophisticated system of gesture production and understanding in prehumans, which provided a template for schema-like sequencing and slot-filling of information units. The second involves the integration of multiple modalities of expression in the communicative act, in particular, the alignment of co-gestural speech and co-speech gesture. With such computational facilities, action-based gestures can be abstracted away from their associated objects and become full event representations. This view supports the MSH argument for the emergence of more complex linguistic expressions from initially holophrastic units. In particular, actions can be thought of as protoverbs, which through this process are abstracted to full event descriptions, i.e., verbs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.17045.pus
2018-09-17
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aboitiz, F.
    (2013) “How did vocal behavior ‘take over’ the gestural communication system?.” Language and Cognition5, no.2–3: 167–176.10.1515/langcog‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abner, N., Cooperrider, K., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2015) Gesture for linguists: A handy primer. Language and linguistics compass, 9(11), 437–451.10.1111/lnc3.12168
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12168 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arbib, M. A.
    (2002) The Mirror System, Imitation, and the Evolution of Language. Imitation in animals and artifacts, 229.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ed. (2006) Action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511541599
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541599 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2008) Holophrasis and the protolanguage spectrum. Interaction Studies, 9(1), pp.154–168.10.1075/is.9.1.11arb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.11arb [Google Scholar]
  6. (2008) From grasp to language: Embodied concepts and the challenge of abstraction. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 4–20.10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2012) How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) Precis of how the brain got language: the mirror system hypothesis. Language and Cognition, 5(2–3), 107–131.10.1515/langcog‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2016) Towards a computational comparative neuroprimatology: framing the language-ready brain. Physics of life reviews, 16, 1–54.10.1016/j.plrev.2015.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Arbib, M. A., Liebal, K. and Pika, S.
    (2008) “Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human language.” Current anthropology49. 6, 1053–1076.10.1086/593015
    https://doi.org/10.1086/593015 [Google Scholar]
  11. Arbib, M. A. & Rizzolatti, G.
    (1997) Neural expectations: a possible evolutionary path from manual skills to language. Communication and Cognition, 29, 393–424.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C. and Wilcox, S. E.
    1995Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620911
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620911 [Google Scholar]
  13. Armstrong, D. F., & Wilcox, S.
    (2007) The gestural origin of language. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195163483.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195163483.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Asher, N.
    (1998) Common ground, corrections and coordination. Journal of Semantics.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.
    (2003) Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Asher, N. and A. Lascarides
    (2008) Commitments, beliefs and intentions in dialogue. Proceedings of Londial, 35–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Austin, J. L.
    (1962) How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bach, K.
    (2003) Speech acts and pragmatics. Blackwell. Guide to the philosophy of language, 147–167.
  19. Bickerton, D.
    (1990) Language and Species, University of Chicago Press. Bickerton, Derek (2009) Adam’s Tongue. Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2009Adam’s tongue: how humans made language, how language made humans. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bohn, M., Call, J. and Tomasello, M.
    (2016) Comprehension of iconic gestures by chimpanzees and human children. Journal of experimental child psychology, 142, pp.1–17.10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cangelosi, A.
    (2010) Grounding language in action and perception: from cognitive agents to humanoid robots. Physics of life reviews7(2), 139–151.10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  24. Clark, H. H., S. E. Brennan, et al.
    (1991) Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition13(1991), 127–149.10.1037/10096‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006 [Google Scholar]
  25. Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S.
    (1983) Common ground at the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 22(2), 245–258.10.1016/S0022‑5371(83)90189‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90189-5 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cooper, R. and Ginzburg, J.
    (2015) “Type theory with records for natural language semantics”. Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pp.375–407.10.1002/9781118882139.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  27. Corballis, Michael C.
    (2003) From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Deacon, Terrence W.
    (1998) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. WW Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Diessel, H.
    (2013) “Where does language come from? Some reflections on the role of deictic gesture and demonstratives in the evolution of language.” Language and Cognition5.2–3: 239–249.10.1515/langcog‑2013‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0017 [Google Scholar]
  30. Engle, R.A. and Clark, H.H.
    1995 Using composites of speech, gestures, diagrams and demonstrations in explanations of mechanical devices. InAmerican Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Long Beach, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fogassi, L., Coude, G. and Ferrari, P. F.
    (2013) The extended features of mirror neurons and the voluntary control of vocalization in the pathway to language. Language and Cognition, 5(2–3), pp.145–155.10.1515/langcog‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fricke, E.
    (2013) Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: A multimodal approach. Body-language-communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 733–754.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gillespie-Lynch, K., Greenfield, P. M., Lyn, H., & Savage-Rumbaugh, S.
    (2014) Gestural and symbolic development among apes and humans: support for a multimodal theory of language evolution. Frontiers in psychology, 5.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01228
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01228 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gibson, J. J.
    (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gilbert, M.
    (1992) On social facts. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Givòn, T.
    (1995) Functionalism and grammar. John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/z.74
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.74 [Google Scholar]
  37. (1998) On the co-evolution of language, mind, and brain. Evolution of Communication, 2(1), 45–116.10.1075/eoc.2.1.04giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eoc.2.1.04giv [Google Scholar]
  38. Glenberg, A. M. & Gallese, V.
    (2012) Action-based language: a theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905–22.10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  39. Goldin-Meadow, S. and Alibali, M.W.
    2013 Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual review of psychology, 64, pp.257-283.10.1146/annurev‑psych‑113011‑143802
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802 [Google Scholar]
  40. Grice, H. P.
    (1981) Presupposition and conversational implicature. InC. Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp.183–198. Reprinted inGrice, H. P. (1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp.269–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hsiao, K. -Y., S. Tellex, S. Vosoughi, R. Kubat, and D. Roy
    (2008) Object schemas for grounding language in a responsive robot. Connection Science20(4), 253–276.10.1080/09540090802445113
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090802445113 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, and W. Tecumseh Fitch
    (2002) “The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?.” Science298.5598: 1569–1579.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hockett, C. F.
    (1960) The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203(3), pp.88–97.10.1038/scientificamerican0960‑88
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 [Google Scholar]
  44. Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O. and Caselli, M. C.
    (1994) From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive development, 9(1), pp.23–43.10.1016/0885‑2014(94)90018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(94)90018-3 [Google Scholar]
  45. Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2005) Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological science, 16(5), 367–371.10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2005.01542.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01542.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U.
    1993 From discourse to logic: Introduction to model-theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kendon, A.
    (1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. InM. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication, 207–228. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of pragmatics, 23(3), pp.247–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lascarides, A. and M. Stone
    (2006) Formal semantics for iconic gesture. InProceedings of the 10th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (BRANDIAL), pp.64–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2009) A formal semantic analysis of gesture. Journal of Semantics26(4), 393–449.10.1093/jos/ffp004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pika, S. and Mitani, J. C.
    (2009) The directed scratch: evidence for a referential gesture in chimpanzees. The prehistory of language, 1, pp.166–181.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545872.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545872.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pustejovsky, J.
    (1995) The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2013) Where things happen: On the semantics of event localization. InProceedings of isa-9: International workshop on semantic annotation.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Pustejovsky, J. and N. Krishnaswamy
    (2014) Generating simulations of motion events from verbal descriptions. InLexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM 2014). ACL.10.3115/v1/S14‑1014
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/S14-1014 [Google Scholar]
  55. Pustejovsky, J. and J. L. Moszkowicz
    (2011) The qualitative spatial dynamics of motion in language. Spatial Cognition & Computation11(1), 15–44.10.1080/13875868.2010.543497
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2010.543497 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rizzolatti, G., and Arbib, M.
    (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194.10.1016/S0166‑2236(98)01260‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0 [Google Scholar]
  57. Schlenker, P.
    (2015) Visible meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Manuscript, Institut Jean-Nicod and New York University.
  58. Searle, J. R.
    (1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol.626). Cambridge university press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  59. Stalnaker, R.
    (2002) Common ground. Linguistics and philosophy25(5), 701–721.10.1023/A:1020867916902
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 [Google Scholar]
  60. Steels, L.
    (1999) The talking heads experiment: Vol. I. Words and meaning (Special preedition). Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2011) Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews, 8(4), 339–356.10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  62. (ed) (2012) Experiments in cultural language evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ais.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.3 [Google Scholar]
  63. Stout, Dietrich, & Hecht, Erin E.
    (2017) Evolutionary neuroscience of cumulative culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7861–7868.10.1073/pnas.1620738114
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620738114 [Google Scholar]
  64. Strickland, B., Geraci, C., Chemla, E., Schlenker, P., Kelepir, M., and Pfau, R.
    (2015) Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi :10.1073/pnas.1423080112
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423080112 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tomasello, M. and M. Carpenter
    (2007) Shared intentionality. Developmental science10(1), 121?125.10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00573.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Vendler, Z.
    (1967) Linguistics and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Volterra, V., Caselli, M. C., Capirci, O., & Pizzuto, E.
    (2005) Gesture and the emergence and development of language. Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates, 3–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. von Uexkll, J.
    (1957) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds, inSchiller, C. H. (ed), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept. New York: International Universities Press, 5–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang, I., M. Ben Fraj, P. Narayana, D. Patil, G. Mulay, R. Bangar, R. Beveridge, B. Draper, and J. Ruiz
    (2017) Eggnog: A continuous, multimodal data set of naturally occurring gestures with ground truth labels. InProceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Whitehead, A. N.
    (1919), An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Natural Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Ziemke, T. & Sharkey, N. E.
    (2001) A stroll through the worlds of robots and animals: Applying Jakob von Uexkll’s theory of meaning to adaptive robots and artificial life. Semiotica, 2001(134), 701–746.10.1515/semi.2001.050
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2001.050 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.17045.pus
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): action , affordances , events , gesture and language

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error