1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Interaction Studies
  4. Volume 18, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Emotional facial expression are an important communication channel between artificial characters and their users. Humans are trained to perceive emotions. Robots and virtual agents can use them to make their inner states transparent. Literature reported that some emotional types, such as anger, are perceived as being more intense than others. Other studies indicated that gender influences the perception. Our study shows that once the individual differences amongst participants are included in the statistical analysis, then the emotion type has no further explanatory power. Artificial characters therefore should adapt to their specific users.

© No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.01mol
2017-12-08
2023-05-29

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.01mol
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agresti, A.
    (2010) Analysis of ordinal categorical data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470594001
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470594001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartneck, C. , Obaid, M. , & Zawieska, K.
    (2013) Agents with faces – what can we learn from lego minfigures. In 1st international conference on human-agent interaction (pp.III–2–1). Retrieved fromhai-conference.net/ihai2013/proceedings/pdf/III-2-1.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartneck, C. , & Reichenbach, J.
    (2005) Subtle emotional expressions of synthetic characters. The international Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartneck, C. , Reichenbach, J. , & Breemen, A.
    (2004) In your face, robot! the influence of a character’s embodiment on how users perceive its emotional ex-pressions. In Proceedings of the design and emotion 2004 conference . Retrieved fromwww.bartneck.de/publications/2004/inYourFaceRobot/bartneckDE2004.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Biele, C. , & Grabowska, A.
    (2006) Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dymanic and static facial expressions. Exp Brain Res, 171, 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00221‑005‑0254‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0254-0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Breazeal, C.
    (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 119–155. Retrieved fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581903000181 (Applications of Affective Computing in Human-Computer Interaction) doi: 10.1016/S1071‑5819(03)00018‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00018-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Calder, A. J. , Keane, J. , Manly, T. , Sprengelmeyer, R. , Scott, S. , Nimmo-Smith, I. , & Young, A.
    (2003) Facial expression recognition across the adult life span. Neuropsychologia, 41, 195–202. doi: 10.1016/S0028‑3932(02)00149‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00149-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Calvo, M. G. , & Nummenmaa, L.
    (2016) Perceptual and affective mechanisms in facial expression recognition: An integrative review. Cognition and Emotion, 30(6), 1081–1106. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1049124
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1049124 [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2015) ordinal—regression models for ordinal data. (R package version 2015.6–28. www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/)
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fong, T. , Nourbakhsh, I. , & Dautenhahn, K.
    (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 143–166. Retrieved fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092188900200372X (Socially Interactive Robots) doi: 10.1016/S0921‑8890(02)00372‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X [Google Scholar]
  11. Hess, U. , Blairy, S. , & Kleck, R. E.
    (1997) The intensity of emotional facial expressions and decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21(4), 241–257. doi: 10.1023/A:1024952730333
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024952730333 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hwang, J. , Park, T. , & Hwang, W.
    (2013) The effects of overall robot shape on the emotions invoked in users and the perceived personalities of robot. Applied Ergonomics, 44(3), 459–471. Retrieved fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687012001688. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kamachi, M. , Bruce, V. , Mukaida, S. , Gyoba, J. , Yoshikawa, S. , & Akamatsu, S.
    (2013) Dynamic properties influence the perception of facial expressions. Perception, 42 (11), 1266–1278. Retrieved frompec.sagepub.com/content/42/11/1266.abstract. doi: 10.1068/p3131n
     https://doi.org/10.1068/p3131n [Google Scholar]
  14. Martina Mittlböck, M. , & Shemper, M.
    (1996) Explained variation for logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 1987–1997. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097‑0258(19961015)15:19<1987::AID‑SIM318>3.0.CO;2‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961015)15:19<1987::AID-SIM318>3.0.CO;2-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsumoto, D. , & Ekman, P.
    (1989) American-japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 143–157. doi: 10.1007/BF00992959
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992959 [Google Scholar]
  16. McClure, E. B.
    (2000) A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 424–253. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.126.3.424
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.424 [Google Scholar]
  17. McColl, D. , & Nejat, G.
    (2014) Recognizing emotional body language displayed by a human-like social robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 261–280. doi: 10.1007/s12369‑013‑0226‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0226-7 [Google Scholar]
  18. Menard, S.
    (2000) Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. The American Statistician, 17–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Core Team
    (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org/
  20. Rapcsak, S. , Galper, S. , Comer, J. , Reminger, S. , Nielsen, L. , & Kaszniak, A.
    (2000) Fear recognition deficits after focal brain damage—a cautionary note. Neurology, 54, 575–581. doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.3.575
     https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.3.575 [Google Scholar]
  21. Russel, J. A.
    (1994) Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? a review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.115.1.102
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.102 [Google Scholar]
  22. Sonnemans, J. , & Frijda, N.
    (1994) The structure of subjective emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 329–350. doi: 10.1080/02699939408408945
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408945 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sonnemans, J. , & Frijda, N. H.
    (1995) The determinants of subjective emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 483–506. doi: 10.1080/02699939508408977
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508408977 [Google Scholar]
  24. Suzuki, A. , Hoshino, T. , & Shigemasu, K.
    (2006) Measuring individual differences in sensitivities to basic emotions in faces. Cognition99, 327–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilhelm, O. , Hildebrandt, A. , Manske, K. , Schacht, A. , & Sommer, W.
    (2014) Test battery for measuring the perception and recognition of facial expressions of emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 404. Retrieved fromjournal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00404
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00404 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.01mol
Loading
Individual differences are more important than the emotional category for the perception of emotional expressions
Interaction Studies 18, 161 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.2.01mol
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.01mol
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.01mol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): differences; emotion; expression; gender; individual

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error