1887
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Past research dedicated to the impact of hierarchy on the autonomic nervous system has focused mainly on dominance. The current study extends this investigation by assessing the effect of social prestige, operationalized through occupational status, and examines whether people react differently when interacting with individuals of high or low occupational status. Participants’ heart rate and electrodermal activity were recorded while they interacted with a confederate who was introduced either as a neurosurgeon (high-status condition) or as a nurse aide (low-status condition). The results show that, contrary to the participants’ skin conductance level, their heart rate was modulated by the confederate’s status. In the high-status condition, participants’ heart rate increased when the “neurosurgeon” approached them, reaching a higher level than when interacting with the person in the low-status condition. We discuss our results in terms of the threats or opportunities that prestige may elicit.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.04cor
2017-12-08
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Album, D. , & Westin, S
    (2008) Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Social science & medicine, 66(1), 182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, C. , Hildreth, J. A. D. , & Howland, L
    (2015) Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. doi: 10.1037/a0038781
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aureli, F. , Preston, S. D. , & de Waal, F
    (1999) Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(1), 59–65. doi: 10.1037/0735‑7036.113.1.59
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.59 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boehm, C
    (1999) Hierarchy in the forest: Egalitarianism and the evolution of human altruism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyce, W. T
    (2004) Social stratification, health, and violence in the very young. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036(1), 47–68. doi: 10.1196/annals.1330.003
    https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1330.003 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradley, M. M. , Codispoti, M. , Cuthbert, B. N. , & Lang, P. J
    (2001) Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276–298. doi: 10.1037/1528‑3542.1.3.276
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brosschot, J. F. , & Thayer, J. F
    (2003) Heart rate response is longer after negative emotions than after positive emotions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50(3), 181–187. doi: 10.1016/S0167‑8760(03)00146‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00146-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, L. M. , Bradley, M. M. , & Lang, P. J
    (2006) Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biological Psychology, 71(3), 303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. C
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cacioppo, J. T. , Tassinary, L. G. , & Berntson, G. G
    (2007) Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511546396
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546396 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, J. T. , Tracy, J. L. , Foulsham, T. , Kingstone, A. , & Henrich, J
    (2013) Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. doi: 10.1037/a0030398
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cloutier, J. , Norman, G. J. , Li, T. , & Berntson, G. G
    (2013) Person perception and autonomic nervous system response: The costs and benefits of possessing a high social status. Biological psychology, 92(2), 301–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cowlishaw, G. , & Dunbar, R. I. M
    (1991) Dominance rank and mating success in male primates. Animal Behaviour, 41(6), 1045–1056. doi: 10.1016/S0003‑3472(05)80642‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80642-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cummins, D
    (2005) Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. The handbook of evolutionary psychology, 676–697.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dalmaso, M. , Galfano, G. , Coricelli, C. , & Castelli, L
    (2014) Temporal Dynamics Underlying the Modulation of Social Status on Social Attention. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e93139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093139
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093139 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalmaso, M. , Pavan, G. , Castelli, L. , & Galfano, G
    (2012) Social status gates social attention in humans. Biology Letters, 8(3), 450–452. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0881
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0881 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deaner, R. O. , Khera, A. V. , & Platt, M. L
    (2005) Monkeys pay per view: Adaptive valuation of social images by Rhesus Macaques. Current Biology, 15(6), 543–548. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.044
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.044 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dovidio, J. F. , Gaertner, S. L. , Isen, A. M. , & Lowrance, R
    (1995) Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 856–865. doi: 10.1177/0146167295218009
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218009 [Google Scholar]
  19. Edelman, M. S. , & Omark, D. R
    (1973) Dominance hierarchies in young children. Social Science Information, 12(1), 103–110. doi: 10.1177/053901847301200105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847301200105 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, L
    (1995) Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(4), 257–333. doi: 10.1016/0162‑3095(95)00050‑U
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00050-U [Google Scholar]
  21. Elo, I. T
    (2009) Social class differentials in health and mortality: Patterns and explanations in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 553–572. doi: 10.1146/annurev‑soc‑070308‑115929
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115929 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fieder, M. , Huber, S. , Bookstein, F. L. , Iber, K. , Schäfer, K. , Winckler, G. , & Wallner, B
    (2005) Status and reproduction in humans: New evidence for the validity of evolutionary explanations on basis of a university sample. Ethology, 111(10), 940–950. doi: 10.1111/j.1439‑0310.2005.01129.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01129.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Foulsham, T. , Cheng, J. T. , Tracy, J. L. , Henrich, J. , & Kingstone, A
    (2010) Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117(3), 319–331. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hawley, P. H
    (1999) The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132. doi: 10.1006/drev.1998.0470
    https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470 [Google Scholar]
  25. Henrich, J. , & Gil-White, F. J
    (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and human behavior, 22(3), 165–196. doi: 10.1016/S1090‑5138(00)00071‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopcroft, R. L
    (2006) Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 104–120. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jones, B. C. , DeBruine, L. M. , Main, J. C. , Little, A. C. , Welling, L. L. M. , Feinberg, D. R. , & Tiddeman, B. P
    (2010) Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1681), 617–624. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1575
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1575 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kanazawa, S
    (2003) Can evolutionary psychology explain reproductive behavior in the contemporary United States?The Sociological Quarterly, 44(2), 291–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1533‑8525.2003.tb00559.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00559.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Kleinke, C. L. , & Williams, G
    (1994) Effects of interviewer status, touch, and gender on cardiovascular reactivity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 247–249. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711389
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711389 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lang, P. J. , Bradley, M. M. , & Cuthbert, B. N
    (1997) Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes, 97–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Long, J. M. , Lynch, J. J. , Machiran, N. M. , Thomas, S. A. , & Malinow, K. L
    (1982) The effect of status on blood pressure during verbal communication. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5(2), 165–172. doi: 10.1007/BF00844806
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844806 [Google Scholar]
  32. Löw, A. , Lang, P. J. , Smith, J. C. , & Bradley, M. M
    (2008) Both Predator and Prey: Emotional Arousal in Threat and Reward. Psychological Science, 19(9), 865–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02170.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02170.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Magee, J. C. , & Galinsky, A. D
    (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211628
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628 [Google Scholar]
  34. Majolo, B. , Lehmann, J. , de Bortoli Vizioli, A. , & Schino, G
    (2012) Fitness-related benefits of dominance in primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 147(4), 652–660. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22031
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22031 [Google Scholar]
  35. Maner, J. K. , DeWall, C. N. , & Gailliot, M. T
    (2008) Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 488–501. doi: 10.1177/0146167207311910
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311910 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mendelson, T. , Thurston, R. C. , & Kubzansky, L. D
    (2008) Affective and cardiovascular effects of experimentally-induced social status. Health Psychology, 27(4), 482–489. doi: 10.1037/0278‑6133.27.4.482
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.4.482 [Google Scholar]
  37. Newton, T. L. , & Bane, C. M
    (2001) Cardiovascular correlates of behavioral dominance and hostility during dyadic interaction. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40(1), 33–46. doi: 10.1016/S0167‑8760(00)00124‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00124-0 [Google Scholar]
  38. Newton, T. L. , Bane, C. M. , Flores, A. , & Greenfield, J
    (1999) Dominance, gender, and cardiovascular reactivity during social interaction. Psychophysiology, 36(2), 245–252. doi: 10.1017/S0048577299971986
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577299971986 [Google Scholar]
  39. Newton, T. L. , Watters, C. A. , Philhower, C. L. , & Weigel, R. A
    (2005) Cardiovascular reactivity during dyadic social interaction: The roles of gender and dominance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57(3), 219–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Niederle, M. , & Vesterlund, L
    (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101. doi: 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067
    https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ratcliff, N. J. , Hugenberg, K. , Shriver, E. R. , & Bernstein, M. J
    (2011) The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1003–1015. doi: 10.1177/0146167211407210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407210 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sapolsky, R. M
    (2004) Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33(1), 393–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144000
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144000 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2005) The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308(5722), 648–652. doi: 10.1126/science.1106477
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106477 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shortell, S. M
    (1974) Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. Social Science & Medicine (1967), 8(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/0037‑7856(74)90003‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(74)90003-1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stephan, E. , Liberman, N. , & Trope, Y
    (2011) The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Strayer, F. F. , Chapeskie, T. R. , & Strayer, J
    (1978) The perception of preschool social dominance. Aggressive behavior, 4(2), 183–192. doi: 10.1002/1098‑2337(1978)4:2<183::AID‑AB2480040209>3.0.CO;2‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1978)4:2<183::AID-AB2480040209>3.0.CO;2-G [Google Scholar]
  47. Strayer, F. F. , & Strayer, J
    (1976) An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among preschool children. Child Development, 47(4), 980–989. doi: 10.2307/1128434
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128434 [Google Scholar]
  48. Treiman, D. J
    (2013) Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Vrana, S. R. , & Rollock, D
    (1996) The social context of emotion: Effects of ethnicity and authority/peer status on the emotional reports of African American college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 296–305. doi: 10.1177/0146167296223008
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223008 [Google Scholar]
  50. (1998) Physiological response to a minimal social encounter: Effects of gender, ethnicity, and social context. Psychophysiology, 35(4), 462–469. doi: 10.1111/1469‑8986.3540462
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3540462 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilkinson, R. G. , & Pickett, K. E
    (2006) Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 62(7), 1768–1784. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.036
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.036 [Google Scholar]
  52. Worchel, S. , Axsom, D. , Ferris, F. , Samaha, G. , & Schweizer, S
    (1978) Determinants of the effect of intergroup cooperation on intergroup attraction. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22(3), 429–439. doi: 10.1177/002200277802200304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277802200304 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wright, R. A. , Killebrew, K. , & Pimpalapure, D
    (2002) Cardiovascular incentive effects where a challenge is unfixed: Demonstrations involving social evaluation, evaluator status, and monetary reward. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 188–197. doi: 10.1111/1469‑8986.3920188
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3920188 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.04cor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.04cor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error