1887
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates a specific aspect of joint attention, that is, the emergence of the sense that one is leading the attentional focus of others. Thirty participants were placed in front of two avatars and had to pay attention to objects that were also attended to by the avatars. Unbeknownst to the participant, the avatars’ gaze orientations were alternately controlled by the participant’s eyes. Eye-tracking data were collected and participants were enquired about their experience to account for their sense of agency. Only five participants noticed that the avatars were following their gaze. The 25 participants who remained unaware that they controlled the avatars nevertheless modified their gazing behavior with an increase in direct gaze toward one of the avatars. This outcome highlights a dissociation between an implicit feeling that a change occurred and the explicit awareness of being the cause of this change.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.05gry
2017-12-08
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adolphs, R.
    (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 165‑178. doi: 10.1038/nrn1056
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1056 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakemore, S. J. , Wolpert, D. M. , & Frith, C. D.
    (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 237‑242. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)01907‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01907-1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Charman, T.
    (2003) Why is joint attention a pivotal skill in autism?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 315‑324. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1199
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1199 [Google Scholar]
  4. Courgeon, M. , & Clavel, C.
    (2013) MARC: A framework that features emotion models for facial animation during human–computer interaction. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 7(4), 311‑319. doi: 10.1007/s12193‑013‑0124‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-013-0124-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Courgeon, M. , Rautureau, G. , Martin, J.-C. , & Grynszpan, O.
    (2014) Joint attention simulation using eye-tracking and virtual humans. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 5(3), 238‑250. doi: 10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2335740
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2335740 [Google Scholar]
  6. David, N. , Newen, A. , & Vogeley, K.
    (2008) The « sense of agency » and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 523‑534. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dratsch, T. , Schwartz, C. , Yanev, K. , Schilbach, L. , Vogeley, K. , & Bente, G.
    (2013) Getting a grip on social gaze: control over others’ gaze helps gaze detection in high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(2), 286‑300. doi: 10.1007/s10803‑012‑1569‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1569-x [Google Scholar]
  8. Driver, J.
    (1999) Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 509‑540. doi: 10.1080/135062899394920
    https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394920 [Google Scholar]
  9. Duranton, C. , & Gaunet, F.
    (2016) Behavioural synchronization from an ethological perspective: Overview of its adaptive value. Adaptive Behavior, 1059712316644966. doi: 10.1177/1059712316644966
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712316644966 [Google Scholar]
  10. Emery, N. J.
    (2000) The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581‑604. doi: 10.1016/S0149‑7634(00)00025‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7 [Google Scholar]
  11. Friesen, C. K. , & Kingstone, A.
    (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490‑495. doi: 10.3758/BF03208827
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208827 [Google Scholar]
  12. Frischen, A. , Bayliss, A. P. , & Tipper, S. P.
    (2007) Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694‑724. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.133.4.694
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grynszpan, O. , Simonin, J. , Martin, J.-C. , & Nadel, J.
    (2012) Investigating social gaze as an action-perception online performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 94. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00094
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00094 [Google Scholar]
  14. Haggard, P. , & Chambon, V.
    (2012) Sense of agency. Current Biology, 22(10), R390‑R392. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040 [Google Scholar]
  15. Horowitz, T. S. , Wolfe, J. M. , Alvarez, G. A. , Cohen, M. A. , & Kuzmova, Y. I.
    (2009) The speed of free will. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 62(11), 2262‑2288. doi: 10.1080/17470210902732155
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902732155 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hove, M. J. , & Risen, J. L.
    (2009) It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949‑960. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949
    https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeannerod, M.
    (2003) The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research, 142(1‑2), 1‑15. doi: 10.1016/S0166‑4328(02)00384‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00384-4 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kajopoulos, J. , Wong, A. H. Y. , Yuen, A. W. C. , Dung, T. A. , Kee, T. Y. , & Wykowska, A.
    (2015) Robot-Assisted Training of Joint Attention Skills in Children Diagnosed with Autism. In A. Tapus , E. André , J.-C. Martin , F. Ferland , & M. Ammi (Éd.), Social Robotics (pp.296‑305). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑25554‑5_30
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_30 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, K. , & Mundy, P.
    (2012) Joint attention, social-cognition, and recognition memory in adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00172
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00172 [Google Scholar]
  20. Langton, S. R. H. , & Bruce, V.
    (1999) Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 541‑567. doi: 10.1080/135062899394939
    https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394939 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mundy, P. , & Newell, L.
    (2007) Attention, Joint Attention, and Social Cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 16(5), 269‑274. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2007.00518.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00518.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Oberwelland, E. , Schilbach, L. , Barisic, I. , Krall, S. C. , Vogeley, K. , Fink, G. R. , Herpertz-Dahlmann, B. , Konrad, K. , & Schulte-Rüther, M.
    (2016) Look into my eyes: Investigating joint attention using interactive eye-tracking and fMRI in a developmental sample. NeuroImage, 130, 248–260. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.026 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pfeiffer, U. J. , Schilbach, L. , Jording, M. , Timmermans, B. , Bente, G. , & Vogeley, K.
    (2012) Eyes on the mind: Investigating the influence of gaze dynamics on the perception of others in real-time social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00537
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00537 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pfeiffer, U. J. , Timmermans, B. , Bente, G. , Vogeley, K. , & Schilbach, L.
    (2011) A non-verbal Turing test: differentiating mind from machine in gaze-based social interaction. PloS One, 6(11), e27591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027591
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027591 [Google Scholar]
  25. Posner, M. I.
    (1980) Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3‑25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231 [Google Scholar]
  26. Raven, J. C. , & Court, J. H.
    (1986) Raven’s progressive matrices and Raven’s coloured matrices. London: HK Lewis.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Richardson, D. C. , & Dale, R.
    (2005) Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045‑1060. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29 [Google Scholar]
  28. Richardson, M. J. , Marsh, K. L. , Isenhower, R. W. , Goodman, J. R. L. , & Schmidt, R. C.
    (2007) Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26(6), 867‑891. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Scaife, M. , & Bruner, J. S.
    (1975) The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature, 253(5489), 265‑266. doi: 10.1038/253265a0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/253265a0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schilbach, L. , Wilms, M. , Eickhoff, S. B. , Romanzetti, S. , Tepest, R. , Bente, G. , Shah, N. J. , Fink, G. R. , & Vogeley, K.
    (2010) Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2702‑2715. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21401
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21401 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmidt, R. C. , & O’Brien, B.
    (1997) Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9(3), 189‑206. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0903_2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sebanz, N. , Bekkering, H. , & Knoblich, G.
    (2006) Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70‑76. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sperduti, M. , Delaveau, P. , Fossati, P. , & Nadel, J.
    (2011) Different brain structures related to self- and external-agency attribution: a brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 216(2), 151‑157. doi: 10.1007/s00429‑010‑0298‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0298-1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Synofzik, M. , Vosgerau, G. , & Newen, A.
    (2008) Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 219‑239. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Warren, Z. E. , Zheng, Z. , Swanson, A. R. , Bekele, E. , Zhang, L. , Crittendon, J. A. , Weitlauf, A. F. , & Sarkar, N.
    (2013) Can Robotic Interaction Improve Joint Attention Skills?Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wegner, D. M.
    (2003) The mind’s best trick: how we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 65‑69. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00002‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wilms, M. , Schilbach, L. , Pfeiffer, U. , Bente, G. , Fink, G. R. , & Vogeley, K.
    (2010) It’s in your eyes—using gaze-contingent stimuli to create truly interactive paradigms for social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 5(1), 98. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq024
    https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq024 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wykowska, A. , Kajopoulos, J. , Ramirez-Amaro, K. , & Cheng, G.
    (2015) Autistic traits and sensitivity to human-like features of robot behavior. Interaction Studies, 16(2), 219‑248. doi: 10.1075/is.16.2.09wyk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.2.09wyk [Google Scholar]
  39. Zaki, J. , & Ochsner, K.
    (2009) The need for a cognitive neuroscience of naturalistic social cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 16‑30. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.2009.04601.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04601.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.05gry
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.2.05gry
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency , avatar , eye-tracking , gaze following , gaze-contingent display and social interactions

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error