Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Albiach-Serrani, A.
    (2015) Cooperation in primates: A critical, methodological review. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 361–382. doi: 10.1075/is.16.3.02alb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.02alb [Google Scholar]
  2. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) On the representation of form and function. Linguistic Review, 1, 3–40. doi: 10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  4. Corballis, M. C.
    (2003) From mouth to hand: Gesture, speech, and the evolution of right-handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(2), 199–260. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X03000062
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000062 [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, W.
    (2017) Evolutionary complexity of social cognition, semasiographic system, and language. In S. S. Mufwene , C. Coupé , & F. Pellegrino (Eds.), Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives (pp.101–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781107294264.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107294264.005 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2003) Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cuskley, C.
    (2013) Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. Public Journal of Semiotics, 5(1), 39–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Vos, C. , & Pfau, R.
    (2015) Sign language typology: The contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 265–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑124958
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124958 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dingemanse, M. , Blasi, D. E. , Lupyan, G. , Christiansen, M. H. , & Monaghan, P.
    (2015) Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dingemanse, M. , Schuerman, W. , Reinisch, E. , Tufvesson, S. , & Mitterer, H.
    (2016) What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language, 92(2), E117–e133. doi: 10.1353/lan.2016.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0034 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dirven, R. , & Verspoor, M.
    (2004) Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/clip.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dor, D. , Knight, C. , & Lewis, J.
    (Eds.) (2014) The social origins of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunbar, R. I. M.
    (2017) Group size, vocal grooming and the origins of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 209–212. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1122‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1122-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Donald, M.
    (2017) Key cognitive preconditions for the evolution of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 204–208. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1102‑x
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1102-x [Google Scholar]
  15. Elleström, L. , Fischer, O. , & Ljungberg, C.
    (Eds.) (2013) Iconic investigations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ill.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.12 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eryilmaz, K. , & Little, H.
    (2016) Using leap motion to investigate the emergence of structure in speech and language. Behavior Research Methods. doi: 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0818‑x
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0818-x [Google Scholar]
  17. Fischer, O.
    (1999) On the role played by iconicity in the grammaticalisation process. In M. Nänny & O. Fischer (Eds.), Form miming Meaning: Iconicity in language and literature (pp.345–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ill.1.26fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.1.26fis [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer, Olga
    2010 An iconic analogical approach to grammaticalization. In Jac Conradie , Ronél Johl , Marthinus Beukes , Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Signergy (Iconicity in Language and Literature 8) pp. (279–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ill.9.17fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.9.17fis [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitch, W. T.
    (2000) The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 258–267. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01494‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01494-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2010) The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511817779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garrod, S. , Fay, N. , Lee, J. , Oberlander, J. , & MacLeod, T.
    (2007) Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from?Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. doi: 10.1080/03640210701703659
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703659 [Google Scholar]
  22. Garrod, S. , Fay, N. , Rogers, S. , Walker, B. , & Nik S.
    (2010) Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols?Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50. doi: 10.1075/is.11.1.04gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.1.04gar [Google Scholar]
  23. Gasser, M.
    (2004) The origins of arbitrariness in language. In K. Forbus , D. Gentner , & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.434–439). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Givón, T.
    (1991) Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language, 15(1), 85–114. doi: 10.1075/sl.15.1.04giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.15.1.04giv [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2003) The resilience of language. What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Haiman, John
    (Ed.) (1985) Iconicity in SyntaxIconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983, Vol. 6 (Typological Studies in Language, 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6 [Google Scholar]
  27. Harnard, S.
    (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346. doi: 10.1016/0167‑2789(90)90087‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2012) From sensorimotor categories and pantomime to grounded symbols and propositions. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp.387–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hurford, James R.
    (2012) The origins of grammar: Language in the light of evolution, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jakobson, Roman
    1965 Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes13. 21–37. doi: 10.1177/039219216501305103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305103 [Google Scholar]
  31. Johansson, N. , & Zlatev, J.
    (2013) Motivations for sound symbolism in spatial deixis: A typological study of 101 languages. Public Journal of Semiotics, 5, 3–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Joseph, John E.
    (2015) Iconicity in saussure’s linguistic work, and why it does not contradict the arbitrariness of the sign. Historiographia Linguistica, 42(1), 85–105. doi: 10.1075/hl.42.1.05jos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.42.1.05jos [Google Scholar]
  33. Keller, R.
    (1995) Zeichentheorie. Zu einer Theorie semiotischen Wissens. Tübingen, Basel: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Knight, C.
    (2000) The evolution of cooperative communication. In C. Knight , M. Studdert-Kennedy , & J. R. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form (pp.19–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511606441.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606441.002 [Google Scholar]
  35. Levinson, Stephen C.
    (2006) On the Human “Interaction Engine”. In Nick J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Socialitypp. (39–69). Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Perlman, Marcus & Nathaniel Clark
    (2015) Learned vocal and breathing behavior in an enculturated gorilla. Animal Cognition18. 1165–1179. doi: 10.1007/s10071‑015‑0889‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0889-6 [Google Scholar]
  37. Senghas, A. , Kita, S. , & Ozyürek, A.
    (2004) Children creating coreproperties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782. doi: 10.1126/science.1100199
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100199 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lewis, D.
    (1969) Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lieberman, P.
    (2007) The evolution of human speech: Its anatomical and neural bases. Current Anthropology, 48(1), 39–66. doi: 10.1086/509092
    https://doi.org/10.1086/509092 [Google Scholar]
  40. MacLarnon, A.
    (2012) The anatomical and physiological basis of human speech production: Adaptations and exaptations. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp.224–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Marsaja, I. G
    2008Desa Kolok—A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Motamedi, Y. , Schouwstra, M. , Smith, K. , & Kirby, S.
    (2016) Linguistic structure emerges in the cultural evolution of artificial sign languages. In S. G. Roberts , C. Cuskley , L. McCrohon , L. Barceló-Coblijn , O. Fehér , & T. Verhoef (Eds.), The evolution of laguage. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference . Available online: evolang.org/neworleans/papers/27.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Nänny, M. , & Fischer, O.
    (Eds.) (1999) Form miming meaning: Iconicity in language and literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ill.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.1 [Google Scholar]
  44. Perlman, M. , Clark, N. , & Tanner, J. E.
    (2014) Iconicity and ape gesture. In E. A. Cartmill , S. Roberts , H. Lyn , & H. Cornish (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (pp.228–235). Singapore: World Scientific. doi: 10.1142/9789814603638_0029
    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814603638_0029 [Google Scholar]
  45. Perniss, P. , & Vigliocco, G.
    (2014) The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0300 (5 May, 2017).
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0300 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pleyer, Michael
    2017 Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences63. 69–90. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pleyer, M.
    (In press). Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sandler, W. , Aronoff, M. , Padden, C. , & Meir, I.
    (2014) Language emergence. Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language. In N. J. Enfield , P. Kockelman , & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp.250–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139342872.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.012 [Google Scholar]
  49. Scott-Phillips, T.
    (2015) Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. London: Pelgrave. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑31273‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-31273-0 [Google Scholar]
  50. Számadó, S. , & Szathmári, E.
    (2012) The co-evolution of language and the brain. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp.157–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2009) Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tomasello, M. , Carpenter, M. , Call, J. , Behne, T. , & Moll, H.
    (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129 [Google Scholar]
  55. Ungerer, F. , & Schmid, H-J.
    (2006) An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow u.a.: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Langendonck, W.
    (2007) Iconicity. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.394–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Vigliocco, G. , Perniss, P. , & Vinson, D.
    (2014) Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0292
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0292 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wacewicz, S. , & Zywiczynski, P.
    (2017) The multimodal origins of linguistic communication. Language & Communication, 54, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zeshan, U. , & de Vos, C.
    (Eds.) (2012) Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614511496
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511496 [Google Scholar]

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error