1887
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Following a synthesis of naturalistic and experimental studies of language creation, we propose a theoretical model that describes the process through which human communication systems might arise and evolve. Three key processes are proposed that give rise to effective, efficient and shared human communication systems: (1) motivated signs that directly resemble their meaning facilitate cognitive alignment, improving communication success; (2) behavioral alignment onto an inventory of shared sign-to-meaning mappings bolsters cognitive alignment between interacting partners; (3) sign refinement, through interactive feedback, enhances the efficiency of the evolving communication system. By integrating the findings across a range of diverse studies, we propose a theoretical model of the process through which the earliest human communication systems might have arisen and evolved. Importantly, because our model is not bound to a single modality it can describe the creation of shared sign systems across a range of contexts, informing theories of language creation and evolution.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.3.02lis
2017-12-08
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arbib, M. A.
    (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(02), 105–124. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000038 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arbib, M. A. , Liebal, K. , & Pika, S.
    (2008) Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human language. Current Anthropology, 49(6), 1053–1076. doi: 10.1086/593015
    https://doi.org/10.1086/593015 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, Q. D. , Meade, A. , Venditti, C. , Greenhill, S. J. , & Pagel, M.
    (2008) Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science, 319(5863), 588. doi: 10.1126/science.1149683
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149683 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baus, C. , Carreiras, M. , & Emmorey, K.
    (2013) When does iconicity in sign language matter?Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), 261–271. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.620374
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.620374 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bavelas, J. B. , Coates, L. , & Johnson, T.
    (2000) Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.6.941
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellugi, U. , & Klima, E. S.
    (1976) Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 514–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1976.tb25514.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25514.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bohn, M. , Call, J. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2016) Comprehension of iconic gestures by chimpanzees and human children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142(C), 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brennan, S. E. , & Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(6), 1482–1493.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cangelosi, A. , & Parisi, D.
    (2002) Computer simulation: A new scientific approach to the study of language evolution. InSimulating the evolution of language (pp.3–28). London: Springer London. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑0663‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0663-0_1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, H. H. , & Brennan, S. E.
    (1991) Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 13, 127–149. doi: 10.1037/10096‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark, H. H. , & Wilkes-Gibbs, D.
    (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(86)90010‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deacon, T. W.
    (1998) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dediu, D. , & Levinson, S. C.
    (2013) On the antiquity of language: The reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fay, N. , & Ellison, T. M.
    (2013) The cultural evolution of human communication systems in different sized populations: Usability trumps learnability. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71781–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071781
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071781 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fay, N. , Ellison, T. M. , & Garrod, S.
    (2014) Iconicity: From sign to system in human communication and language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(2), 244–263. doi: 10.1075/pc.22.2.05fay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.05fay [Google Scholar]
  16. Fay, N. , Arbib, M. , & Garrod, S.
    (2013) How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–1367. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12048
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12048 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fay, N. , Garrod, S. , & Roberts, L.
    (2008) The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363(1509), 3553–3561. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0130
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0130 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fay, N. , Garrod, S. , Roberts, L. , & Swoboda, N.
    (2010) The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 351–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01090.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01090.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Fay, N. , Lister, C. J. , Ellison, T. M. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2014) Creating a communication system from scratch: Gesture beats vocalization hands down. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00354
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00354 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fay, N. , Walker, B. , Swoboda, N. , & Garrod, S.
    (2016) How to create a shared symbol system: Observation, cognitive bias and social interaction. Manuscript under revision.
  21. Fitch, W. T.
    (2005) The evolution of language: A comparative review. Biology & Philosophy, 20(2–3), 193–203. doi: 10.1007/s10539‑005‑5597‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-5597-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Frishberg, N.
    (1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 51(3), 696–719. doi: 10.2307/412894
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412894 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fusaroli, R. , Bahrami, B. , Olsen, K. , Roepstorff, A. , Rees, G. , Frith, C. , & Tylen, K.
    (2012) Coming to terms: Quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological Science, 23(8), 931–939. doi: 10.1177/0956797612436816
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612436816 [Google Scholar]
  24. Galantucci, B.
    (2005) An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 737–767. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_34
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_34 [Google Scholar]
  25. Garrod, S. , & Anderson, A.
    (1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27(2), 181–218. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(87)90018‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90018-7 [Google Scholar]
  26. Garrod, S. , & Pickering, M. J.
    (2004) Why is conversation so easy?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  27. Garrod, S. , Fay, N. , Lee, J. , Oberlander, J. , & MacLeod, T.
    (2007) Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from?Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. doi: 10.1080/03640210701703659
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703659 [Google Scholar]
  28. Garrod, S. , Fay, N. , Rogers, S. , Walker, B. , & Swoboda, N.
    (2010) Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols?Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50. doi: 10.1075/is.11.1.04gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.1.04gar [Google Scholar]
  29. Gasser, M.
    (2004) The origins of arbitrariness in language. Presented at the Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.434–439). Mahwah, NJ.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2010) Widening the lens on language learning: Language creation in deaf children and adults in Nicaragua. Human Development, 53(5), 303–311. doi: 10.1159/000321294
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000321294 [Google Scholar]
  31. Harnad, S.
    (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. doi: 10.1016/0167‑2789(90)90087‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Healey, P. G. T. , Swoboda, N. , Umata, I. , & Katagiri, Y.
    (2002) Graphical representation in graphical dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 375–395. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1022
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1022 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hockett, C. F.
    (1978) In search of Jove's Brow. American Speech, 53(4), 243–313. doi: 10.2307/455140
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455140 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hupet, M. , & Chantraine, Y.
    (1992) Changes in repeated references: Collaboration or repetition effects?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21(6), 485–496. doi: 10.1007/BF01067526
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067526 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hurford, J. R.
    (2007) The origins of meaning (Vol. 1 of Languge in the light of evolution). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.4324/9780203937488
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937488 [Google Scholar]
  36. Imai, M. , & Kita, S.
    (2014) The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130298. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0298
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kirby, S.
    (2001) Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure-an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(2), 102–110. doi: 10.1109/4235.918430
    https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.918430 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lieberman, E. , Michel, J.-B. , Jackson, J. , Tang, T. , & Nowak, M. A.
    (2007) Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature, 449(7163), 713–716. doi: 10.1038/nature06137
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06137 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lister, C. J. , Fay, N. , Ellison, T. M. , & Ohan, J.
    (2015) Creating a new communication system: Gesture has the upper hand. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society .
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Monaghan, P. , Shillcock, R. C. , Christiansen, M. H. , & Kirby, S.
    (2014) How arbitrary is language?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130299. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0299
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0299 [Google Scholar]
  41. Oudgenoeg-Paz, O. , Volman, M. C. J. M. , & Leseman, P. P. M.
    (2012) Attainment of sitting and walking predicts development of productive vocabulary between ages 16 and 28 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 35(4), 733–736. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pagel, M. , Atkinson, Q. D. , Calude, A. S. , & Meade, A.
    (2013) Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21), 8471–8476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218726110
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218726110 [Google Scholar]
  43. Perlman, M. , & Cain, A. A.
    (2016) Iconicity in vocalization, comparisons with gesture, and implications for theories on the evolution of language. Gesture, 14(3), 320–350. doi: 10.1075/gest.14.3.03per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.14.3.03per [Google Scholar]
  44. Perlman, M. , Dale, R. , & Lupyan, G.
    (2015) Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8), 150152–16. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150152
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150152 [Google Scholar]
  45. Perniss, P. , & Vigliocco, G.
    (2014) The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130300. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0300
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0300 [Google Scholar]
  46. Perniss, P. , Thompson, R. L. , & Vigliocco, G.
    (2010) Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227 [Google Scholar]
  47. Perry, L. K. , Perlman, M. , & Lupyan, G.
    (2015) Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0137147–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137147
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137147 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pickering, M. J. , & Garrod, S.
    (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
  49. Peirce, C. S.
    (1931–1958) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by C. Hathorne , P. Weiss , & A. Burks . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Roberts, G. , Lewandowski, J. , & Galantucci, B.
    (2015) How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality. Cognition, 141(C), 52–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rowe, M. L. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2009) Early gesture selectivelypredicts later language learning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 182–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00764.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00764.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Sandler, W. , Aronoff, M. , Meir, I. , & Padden, C.
    (2011) The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 503–543. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9128‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9128-2 [Google Scholar]
  53. Saussure, F. de
    1916A course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Schober, M. F. , & Clark, H. H.
    (1989) Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 211–232. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90008‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90008-X [Google Scholar]
  55. Scott-Phillips, T. C. , Kirby, S. , & Ritchie, G. R. S.
    (2009) Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  56. Seyfarth, R. M. , Cheney, D. L. , & Bergman, T. J.
    (2005) Primate social cognition and the origins of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 264–266. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Steels, L.
    (2011) Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews, 8(4), 339–356. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gibson, K. , & Tallerman, M.
    (2012) The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Theisen, C. A. , Oberlander, J. , & Kirby, S.
    (2010) Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14–32. doi: 10.1075/is.11.1.08the
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.1.08the [Google Scholar]
  60. Wescott, R. W.
    (1971) Linguistic iconism. Language, 47(2), 416–428. doi: 10.2307/412089
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412089 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wilkes-Gibbs, D. , & Clark, H. H.
    (1992) Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 183–194. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(92)90010‑U
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90010-U [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.3.02lis
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.3.02lis
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): alignment , feedback , gesture , icon , index , interaction , language evolution , language origin , signs , symbol and vocalization

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error