Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Arbitrary communication systems can emerge from iconic beginnings through processes of conventionalisation via interaction. Here, we explore whether this process of conventionalisation occurs with continuous, auditory signals. We conducted an artificial signalling experiment. Participants either created signals for themselves, or for a partner in a communication game. We found no evidence that the speech-like signals in our experiment became less iconic or simpler through interaction. We hypothesise that the reason for our results is that when it is difficult to be iconic initially because of the constraints of the modality, then iconicity needs to emerge to enable grounding before conventionalisation can occur. Further, pressures for discrimination, caused by the expanding meaning space in our study, may cause more complexity to emerge, again as a result of the restrictive signalling modality. Our findings have possible implications for the processes of conventionalisation possible in signed and spoken languages, as the spoken modality is more restrictive than the manual modality.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Brennan, S. E. , & Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482–1493. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.22.6.1482
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482 [Google Scholar]
  2. Caldwell, C. A. , & Smith, K.
    (2012) Cultural evolution and perpetuation of arbitrary communicative conventions in experimental microsocieties. PloS One, 7(8), e43807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043807
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043807 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carr, J. W. , Smith, K. , Cornish, H. , & Kirby, S.
    (2016) The cultural evolution of structured languages in an open-ended, continuous world. Cognitive Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehret, K. , & Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2011) An information-theoretic approach to assess linguistic complexity. Complexity and isolation. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eryilmaz, K. , & Little, H.
    (2016) Using leap motion to investigate the emergence of structure in speech and language. Behavioral Research Methods. doi: 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0818‑x
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0818-x [Google Scholar]
  6. Galantucci, B. , & Garrod, S.
    (2011) Experimental semiotics: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(11), 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00011
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Garrod, S. , Fay, N. , Lee, J. , Oberlander, J. , & MacLeod, T.
    (2007) Foundations of representation: where might graphical symbol systems come from?Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. doi: 10.1080/03640210701703659
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703659 [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldin-Meadow, S. , & McNeill, D.
    (1999) The role of gesture and mimetic representation in making language the province of speech. In M. C. Corballis & S. E. G. Lea (Eds.), The descent ofmind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp.xii, 361). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Healey, P. G. , Swoboda, N. , Umata, I. , & King, J.
    (2007) Graphical language games: Interactional constraints on representational form. Cognitive Science, 31(2), 285–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hockett, C. F.
    (1960) The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–111. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960‑88
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 [Google Scholar]
  11. Imai, M. , & Kita, S.
    (2014) The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130298. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0298
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirby, S. , Cornish, H. , & Smith, K.
    (2008) Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707835105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707835105 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirby, S. , Tamariz, M. , Cornish, H. , & Smith, K.
    (2015) Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure. Cognition, 141, 87–102. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Motamedi, Y. , Schouwstra, M. , Smith, K. , & Kirby, S.
    (2016) Linguistic structure emerges in the cultural evolution of artificial sign languages. In S. G. Roberts , C. Cuskley , L. McCrohon , L. Barcelo-Coblijn , O. Feher , & T. Verhoef (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th international conference (evolang 11) (pp.493–495).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Namboodiripad, S. , Lenzen, D. , Lepic, R. , & Verhoef, T.
    (2016) Measuring conventionalization in the manual modality. Journal ofLanguage Evolution, lzw005. doi: 10.1093/jole/lzw005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzw005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Perlman, M. , Dale, R. , & Lupyan, G.
    (2015) Iconcity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8), 150152. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150152
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150152 [Google Scholar]
  17. Roberts, G. , & Galantucci, B.
    (2012) The emergence of duality of patterning: Insights from the laboratory. Language and Cognition, 4(4), 297–318. doi: 10.1515/langcog‑2012‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
  18. Roberts, G. , Lewandowski, J. , & Galantucci, B.
    (2015) How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality. Cognition, 141, 52–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sandler, W. , Aronoff, M. , Meir, I. , & Padden, C.
    (2011) The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 503–543. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9128‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9128-2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Schlehofer, D.
    (2016) Sign language archaeology: Understanding the historical roots of american sign language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Theisen, C. A. , Oberlander, J. , & Kirby, S.
    (2010) Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14–32. doi: 10.1075/is.11.1.08the
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.1.08the [Google Scholar]
  22. Verhoef, T. , Kirby, S. , & Boer, B.
    (2015) Iconicity and the emergence of combinatorial structure in language. Cognitive Science, 40(8), 1969–1994. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12326
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12326 [Google Scholar]
  23. Winters, J. , Kirby, S. , & Smith, K.
    (2015) Languages adapt to their contextual niche. Language and Cognition, 7(3), 415–449. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2014.35
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.35 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Conventionalisation; Experimental semiotics; Iconicity; Language Evolution; Speech
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error