1887
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

A persistent controversy in language evolution research has been whether language emerged in the gestural-visual or in the vocal-auditory modality. A “dialectic” solution to this age-old debate has now been gaining ground: language was fully multimodal from the start and remains so to this day. In this paper, we show this solution to be too simplistic and outline a more specific theoretical proposal, which we designate as pantomime-first. To decide between the multimodal-first and alternatives, we review several lines of interdisciplinary evidence and complement it with a cognitive-semiotic experiment. In the study, the participants saw – and then matched to hand-drawn images – recordings of short transitive events enacted by 4 actors in two conditions: visual (only body movement) and multimodal (body movement accompanied by nonlinguistic vocalization). Significantly, the matching accuracy was greater in the visual than the multimodal condition, though a follow-up experiment revealed that the emotional profiles of the events enacted in the multimodal condition could be reliably detected from the sound alone. We see these results as supporting the proposed pantomime-first scenario.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.3.08zla
2017-12-08
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aboitiz, F.
    (2012) Gestures, vocalizations, and memory in language origins. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4(2), 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00002
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrén, M.
    (2010) Children's gestures between 18 and 30 months. Lund: Media Tryck.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arbib, M.
    (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and brain sciences, 28, 105–168. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000038 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2012) How the brain got language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Armstrong, D. F. , Stokoe, W. C. , & Wilcox, S. E.
    (1995) Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620911
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620911 [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong, D. F. , & Wilcox, S. E.
    (2007) The gestural origin of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195163483.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195163483.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, J. E.
    (2012) The evolution of symbolic communication: An embodied perspective. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
  8. Burling, R.
    (2005) The talking ape: How language evolved. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Call, J. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2007) The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chandler, D.
    (2007) Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Clay, Z. , & Zuberbühler, K.
    (2014) Vocal communication and social awareness in chimpanzees and bonobos: Insights from studies of vocal communication. In D. Dor , C. Knight , & J. Lewis (Eds.), The social origins of language (pp.141–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins, C.
    (2013) Paleopoetics: The evolution of the literary imagination. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Corballis, M. C.
    (2003) From mouth to hand: Gesture, speech, and the evolution of right-handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(2), 199–208. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X03000062
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000062 [Google Scholar]
  14. Donald, M.
    (1991) Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of human culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dor, D.
    (2015) The instruction of imagination: Language as a social communication technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256623.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256623.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunbar, R.
    (1996) Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber & Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fay, N. , Arbib, M. , & Garrod, D.
    (2013) How to bootstrapp a human communication system. Cognitive Science, 37, 1356–1367. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12048
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12048 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fay, N. , Lister, C. J. , Ellison, T. M. , & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2014) Creating a communication system from scratch: gesture beats vocalization hands down. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00354
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00354 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitch, W. T.
    (2010) The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511817779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779 [Google Scholar]
  20. Galantucci, B. , & Garrod, S.
    (2010) Experimental semiotics: A new approach for studying the emergence and the evolution of human communication. Interaction Studies, 11, 1–13. doi: 10.1075/is.11.1.01gal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.1.01gal [Google Scholar]
  21. (2011) Experimental semiotics: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(11). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00011
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gardner, R. A. , & Gardner, B. T.
    (1969) Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science165, 664–672. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3894.664
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.165.3894.664 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hewes, G. W.
    (1973) Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Current Anthropology, 14(1/2), 5–24. doi: 10.1086/201401
    https://doi.org/10.1086/201401 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hobaiter, C. & Byrne, R. W.
    (2012) Gesture use in consortship: Wild chimpanzees’ use of gesture for an ‘evolutionarily urgent’ purpose. In S. Pika & K. Liebal (Eds.), Developments in primate gesture research (pp.129–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.6.08hob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.6.08hob [Google Scholar]
  25. Johansson, S.
    (2005) Origins of language: Constraints on hypotheses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.5 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kemmerer, D. , Chandrasekaran, B. , & Tranel, D.
    (2007) A case of impaired verbalization but preserved gesticulation of motion events. Cognitive neuropsychology, 24(1), 70–114. doi: 10.1080/02643290600926667
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290600926667 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2012) Language and kinesic complexity. Gesture, 12, 308–326. doi: 10.1075/gest.12.3.02ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.02ken [Google Scholar]
  29. (2014a) Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of “language”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1651), 20130293. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0293
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2014b) The 'poly-modalic' nature of utterances and its implication. In D. Dor , C. Knight , & D. Lewis (Eds.), The social origins of language (pp.67–76). Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kita, S. , & Özyurek, A.
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
  32. Landau, B. , & Gleitman, L. R.
    (2009) Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Levinson, S. C. , & Holler, J.
    (2014) The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 201303302. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0302
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0302 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lock, A. , & Zukow-Goldring, P.
    (2010) Preverbal communication. In J. Bremner & T. Wachs (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp.394–425). Oxford: Willey-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444327564.ch13
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327564.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  35. MacNeilage, P. F.
    (2008) The origin of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McNeill, D.
    (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92, 350–371. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2012) How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139108669
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108669 [Google Scholar]
  39. Meir, I. , Aronoff, M. , Börstell, C. , Hwang, S. , Ilkbasaran, D. , Kastner, I. , Lepic, R. , Ben Basat, A. L. , Padden, C. , & Sandler, W.
    (2017) The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition, 158, 189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mithen, S.
    (2005) The singing Neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind and body. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Murillo, E. , & Belinchón, M.
    (2012) Gestural-vocal coordination. Gesture, 12, 16–39. doi: 10.1075/gest.12.1.02mur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.1.02mur [Google Scholar]
  42. Paus, T.
    (2001) Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(6), 417–424. doi: 10.1038/35077500
    https://doi.org/10.1038/35077500 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pika, S.
    (2008) What is the nature of gestural communication in great apes?The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp.165–186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12.11pik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.11pik [Google Scholar]
  44. Schel, A. M. , Townsend, S. W. , Machanda, Z. , Zuberbühler, K. , & Slocombe, K. E.
    (2013) Chimpanzee alarm call production meets key criteria for intentionality. PloS One, 8(10), e76674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076674
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076674 [Google Scholar]
  45. See, A.
    (2014) Reevaluating chimpanzee vocal signals: Toward a multimodal account of the origins of human communication. In M. Pina & N. Gontier (Eds.), The evolution of social communication in primates (pp.195–215). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02669‑5_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02669-5_11 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sonesson, G.
    (1997) The ecological foundations of iconicity. Semiotics around the world: Synthesis in diversity (pp.739–742). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stokoe, W. C.
    (1991) Semantic phonology. Sign Language Studies, 71, 107–114. doi: 10.1353/sls.1991.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1991.0032 [Google Scholar]
  48. Taglialatela, J. P. , Russell, J. L. , Schaeffer, J. A. , & Hopkins, W. D.
    (2011) Chimpanzee vocal signaling points to a multimodal origin of human language. PloS One, 6(4), e18852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018852
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018852 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomasello, M.
    (2008) The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vigliocco, G. , Perniss, P. , & Vinson, D.
    (2014) Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1651), 20130292. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0292
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0292 [Google Scholar]
  51. Volterra, V. , Caselli, M. , Caprici, O. , & Pizzuto, E.
    (2005) Gesture and the emergence and development of language. In M. Tomasello & D. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Bates (pp.3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wacewicz, S. , Zywiczynski, P. , & Orzechowski, S.
    (2016) Visible movements of the orofacial area. Evidence for gestural or multimodal theories of language evolution?Gesture15(2), 251–284 doi: 10.1075/gest.15.2.05wac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.2.05wac [Google Scholar]
  53. Wittgenstein, L.
    (1953) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Zlatev, J.
    (1997) Situated embodiment: Studies in the emergence of spatial meaning. Stockholm: Gotab.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2008) From proto-mimesis to language: Evidence from primatology and social neuroscience. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 102, 137–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.016 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2012) Cognitive semiotics: An emerging field for the transdisciplinary study of meaning. Public Journal of Semiotics, 4, 2–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. (2014) Bodily mimesis and the transition to speech. In M. Pina & N. Gontier (Eds.), The evolution of social communication in primates (pp.165–178). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02669‑5_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02669-5_9 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zywiczynski, P. , & Wacewicz, S.
    (2015) Ewolucja języka. W stronę hipotez gesturalnych. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zywiczynski, P. , Wacewicz, S. , & Sibierska, M.
    (2016) Defining pantomime for language evolution research Topoi. An International Review of Philosophy [in press]. doi: 10.1007/s11245‑016‑9425‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9425-9 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.3.08zla
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18.3.08zla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error