1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current study examined whether infants use previous encounters for maintaining expectations for adults’ contingent responding. An unfamiliar adult responded contingently or non-contingently to infant signaling during an initial play situation and 10 min later presented an ambiguous toy while providing positive information (Experiment 1; forty-two 12-month-olds). The infants in the contingent group looked more at the adult during toy presentation and played more with the toy during the concluding free-play situation than the infants in the non-contingent group. When the parent had responded contingently or non-contingently to infant bids (Experiment 2; forty 12-month-olds), the infants in the contingent group tended to look more at the parent and tended to play more with the toy than did the infants in the non-contingent group. The results indicate that from just a brief exposure, infants form expectations about adults’ responsiveness and maintain these expectations of contingent/non-contingent responding from one situation to another.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.18044.ste
2021-09-17
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bigelow, A. E., & Birch, S. A. J.
    (1999) The effects of contingency in previous interactions on infants’ preference for social partners. Infant Behavior and Development, 22(3), 367–382. 10.1016/S0163‑6383(99)00016‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(99)00016-8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Feinman, S.
    (1992) In the broad valley. An integrated look at social referencing. InS. Feinman (Ed.), Social referencing and the social construction of reality in infancy, (pp.3–13). New York: Plenum. 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑2462‑9_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2462-9_1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Feinman, S., Roberts, D., Hsieh, K-F., Sawyer, D., & Swanson, D.
    (1992) A critical review of social referencing in infancy. InS. Feinman (Ed.), Social referencing and the social construction of reality in infancy, (pp.15–54). New York: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑2462‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2462-9_2 [Google Scholar]
  5. Feldman, R.
    (2007) Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(3/4), 329–354. 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.2006.01701.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Gergely, G., Koós, O., & Watson, J. S.
    (2010) Contingent Parental Reactivity in Early Socio-Emotional Development. InT. Fuchs, H. C. Sattel, & P. Henningsen (Eds.), The embodied self: Dimensions, coherence and disorders, (pp.141–169). Stuttgart: Schattauer GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S.
    (1999) Early social-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social biofeedback model. In: P. Rochat (Ed.), Early Social Cognition, (pp.101–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hains, S. M. J., & Muir, D. W.
    (1996) Effects of stimulus contingency in infant-adult interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 19(1), 49–61. 10.1016/S0163‑6383(96)90043‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90043-0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Keller, H., Lohaus, A., Völker, S., Cappenberg, M., & Chasiotis, A.
    (1999) Temporal contingency as an independent component of parenting behavior. Child Development, 70(2), 474–485. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00034
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00034 [Google Scholar]
  10. Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J.
    (2009) The many faces of the still-face paradigm: A review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 29(2), 120–162. 10.1016/j.dr.2009.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Needham, A., Joh, A. S., Wiesen, S. E., & Williams, N.
    (2014) Effects of contingent reinforcement of actions on infants’ object-directed reaching. Infancy, 19(5), 496–517. 10.1111/infa.12058
    https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12058 [Google Scholar]
  12. Neisser, U.
    (1991) Two perceptually given aspects of the self and their development. Developmental Review, 11(3), 197–209. 10.1016/0273‑2297(91)90009‑D
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90009-D [Google Scholar]
  13. Northrup, J. B., Libertus, K., & Iverson, J. M.
    (2017) Response to changing contingencies in infants at high and low risk for autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 10, 1239–1248. 10.1002/aur.1770
    https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1770 [Google Scholar]
  14. Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., … Silverstein, M.
    (2014) Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), 843–849. 10.1542/peds.2013‑3703
    https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3703 [Google Scholar]
  15. Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B.
    (2015) Mobile and interactive media use by children: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics, 135(1), 1–3. 10.1542/peds.2014‑2251
    https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2251 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ramey, C. T., & Ourth, L. L.
    (1971) Delayed reinforcement and vocalization rates of infants. Child Development, 42(1), 291–297. 10.2307/1127083
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1127083 [Google Scholar]
  17. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L.
    (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. 10.1037/0033‑2909.86.2.420
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 [Google Scholar]
  18. Stenberg, G.
    (2009) Selectivity in infant social referencing. Infancy, 14(4), 457–473. 10.1080/15250000902994115
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000902994115 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2017a) Does contingency in adults’ responding influence 12-month-old infants’ social referencing?Infant Behavior and Development, 46, 67–79. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.013 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2017b) Effects of adults’ contingent responding on infants’ behavior in ambiguous situations. Infant Behavior and Development, 49, 50–61. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Stenberg, G., & Hagekull, B.
    (1997) Social referencing and mood modification in 1-year-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 20(2), 209–217. 10.1016/S0163‑6383(97)90023‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(97)90023-0 [Google Scholar]
  22. Stern, D.
    (1999) Vitality contours: The temporal contour of feelings as a basic unit for constructing the infant’s social experience. InP. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life, (pp.67–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Striano, T., Henning, A., & Vaish, A.
    (2006) Selective looking by 12-month-olds to a temporally contingent partner. Interaction studies, 7(2), 233–250. 10.1075/is.7.2.07str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.2.07str [Google Scholar]
  24. Tarabulsy, G. M., Tessier, R., & Kappas, A.
    (1996) Contingency detection and the contingent organization of behavior in interactions: Implications for socioemotional development in infancy. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 25–41. 10.1037/0033‑2909.120.1.25
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.25 [Google Scholar]
  25. van Egeren, L. A., Barratt, M. S., & Roach, M. A.
    (2001) Mother-infant responsiveness: Timing, mutual regulation, and interactional context. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 684–697. 10.1037/0012‑1649.37.5.684
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.684 [Google Scholar]
  26. Walden, T. A., & Baxter, A.
    (1989) The effect of context and age on social referencing. Child Development, 60(6), 1511–1518. 10.2307/1130939
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130939 [Google Scholar]
  27. Watson, J. S., & Ramey, C. T.
    (1972) Reactions to response-contingent stimulation in early infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, IS, 219–227.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.18044.ste
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.18044.ste
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contingency; familiar adult; infants; social referencing; unfamiliar adult

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error