1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Interaction Studies
  4. Volume 23, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Understanding the impact of robot errors in child-robot-interactions (CRI) is critical, as current technological systems are still limited and may randomly present a variety of mistakes during interactions with children. In this study we manipulate a task-based error of a NAO robot during a semi-autonomous computational thinking task implemented with the Cozmo robot. Data from 72 children aged 7–10 were analysed regarding their attitudes towards NAO (social trust, competency trust, liking, and perceived agency), their behaviour towards the robot (self-disclosure, following recommendations), as well as their task performance. We did not find quantitative effects of the robot’s error on children’s self-reported attitudes, behaviour, or task performance. Age was also not significantly related to either social attitudes or behaviours towards NAO, although there were some age-related differences in task performance. Potential reasons behind the lack of statistical effects and limitations of the study with regards to the manipulation of robot errors are discussed and insights into the design of future CRI studies provided.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.21034.sto
2023-03-24
2024-12-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/is.21034.sto
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, A. L., Phillips, E. K., Ullman, D., & Keebler, J. R.
    (2018) Toward an understanding of trust repair in human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(4), 1–30. 10.1145/3181671
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3181671 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barco, A., de Jong, C., Peter, J., Kühne, R., & van Straten, C. L.
    (2020) Robot Morphology and Children’s Perception of Social Robots. Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 125–127. 10.1145/3371382.3378348
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378348 [Google Scholar]
  3. Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., de Greeff, J., Kennedy, J., Read, R., Looije, R., Neerincx, M., Baroni, I., & Zelati, M. C.
    (2013) Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges. International conference on social robotics (icsr) (pp.452–459). 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02675‑6_45
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_45 [Google Scholar]
  4. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F.
    (2018) Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954. 10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
     https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernard, S., Harris, P. L., Terrier, N., & Clément, F.
    (2015) Children weigh the number of informants and perceptual uncertainty when identifying objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1361, 70–81. 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bethel, C. L., Henkel, Z., Stives, K., May, D. C., Eakin, D. K., Pilkinton, M., Jones, A., & Stubbs-Richardson, M.
    (2016) Using robots to interview children about bullying: Lessons learned from an exploratory study. 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 712–717. 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745197
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745197 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bethel, C. L., Stevenson, M. R., & Scassellati, B.
    (2011) Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2489–2494. 10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6084051
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6084051 [Google Scholar]
  8. Breazeal, C., Harris, P. L., DeSteno, D., Kory Westlund, J. M., Dickens, L., & Jeong, S.
    (2016) Young Children Treat Robots as Informants. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 481–491. 10.1111/tops.12192
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12192 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brink, K. A., & Wellman, H. M.
    (2020) Robot teachers for children? Young children trust robots depending on their perceived accuracy and agency. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1268–1277. 10.1037/dev0000884
     https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000884 [Google Scholar]
  10. Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Paiva, A., & McOwan, P. W.
    (2012) Detecting Engagement in HRI: An Exploration of Social and Task-Based Context. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, 421–428. 10.1109/SocialCom‑PASSAT.2012.51
     https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.51 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chandra, S., Alves-Oliveira, P., Lemaignan, S., Sequeira, P., Paiva, A., & Dillenbourg, P.
    (2016) Children’s peer assessment and self-disclosure in the presence of an educational robot. 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), (August), 539–544. 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745170
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745170 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen, I., Looije, R., & Neerincx, M. A.
    (2014) Child’s Perception of Robot’s Emotions: Effects of Platform, Context and Experience. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(4), 507–518. 10.1007/s12369‑014‑0230‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0230-6 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohn, N. B., & Strassberg, D. S.
    (1983) Self-Disclosure Reciprocity among Preadolescents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(1), 97–102. 10.1177/0146167283091013
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283091013 [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C.
    (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 457. 10.1037/0033‑2909.116.3.457
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dang, J., King, K. M., & Inzlicht, M.
    (2020) Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24 (4), 267–269. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Houwer, J.
    (2006) What are implicit measures and why are we using them. The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction, 11–28. 10.4135/9781412976237.n2
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976237.n2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Dio, C., Manzi, F., Peretti, G., Cangelosi, A., Harris, P. L., Massaro, D., & Marchetti, A.
    (2020) Shall I Trust You? From Child-Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 111 (April). 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fagerlund, J., Häkkinen, P., Vesisenaho, M., & Viiri, J.
    (2021) Computational thinking in programming with scratch in primary schools: a systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 12–28. 10.1002/cae.22255
     https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22255 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fior, M., Nugent, S., Beran, T. N., Ramírez-Serrano, A., & Kuzyk, R.
    (2010) Children’s relationships with robots: robot is child’s new friend. Journal of Physical Agents (JoPha), 4 (3), 9–17. 10.14198/JoPha.2010.4.3.02
     https://doi.org/10.14198/JoPha.2010.4.3.02 [Google Scholar]
  20. Geiskkovitch, D. Y., Thiessen, R., Young, J. E., & Glenwright, M. R.
    (2019) What? That’s Not a Chair!: How Robot Informational Errors Affect Children’s Trust Towards Robots. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 48–56. 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673024
     https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673024 [Google Scholar]
  21. Geiskkovitch, D. Y., & Young, J. E.
    (2020) Social robots don’t do that: exploring robot-typical errors in child-robot interaction. Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 200–202. 10.1145/3371382.3378295
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378295 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M.
    (2007) Dimensions of Mind Perception. Science, 315(5812), 619–619. 10.1126/science.1134475
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris, P. L., Koenig, M. A., Corriveau, K. H., & Jaswal, V. K.
    (2018) Cognitive Foundations of Learning from Testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 251–273. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑122216‑011710
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011710 [Google Scholar]
  24. Henkel, Z., Baugus, K., Bethel, C. L., & May, D. C.
    (2019) User expectations of privacy in robot assisted therapy. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 10(1), 140–159. 10.1515/pjbr‑2019‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0010 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hertz, N., & Wiese, E.
    (2016) Influence of agent type and task ambiguity on conformity in social decision making. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 60(1), 313–317. 10.1177/1541931213601071
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601071 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones, A., Castellano, G., & Bull, S.
    (2014) Investigating the Effect of a Robotic Tutor on Learner Perception of Skill Based Feedback. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) (pp.186–195). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑11973‑1_19
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_19 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kahn, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., & Shen, S.
    (2012) “robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303–314. 10.1037/a0027033
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027033 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kahn, P. H., & Turiel, E.
    (1988) Children’s Conceptions of Trust in the Context of Social Expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34 (4), 403–419.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T.
    (2015) The Robot Who Tried Too Hard. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction – HRI ’15, (801), 67–74. 10.1145/2696454.2696457
     https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696457 [Google Scholar]
  30. Koenig, M. A., Clement, F., & Harris, P. L.
    (2004) Trust in Testimony: Children’s Use of True and False Statements. Psychological Science, 15(10), 694–698. 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00742.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00742.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L.
    (2005) Preschoolers Mistrust Ignorant and Inaccurate Speakers. Child Development, 76(6), 1261–1277. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2005.00849.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Kory-Westlund, J. M., & Breazeal, C.
    (2019a) A Long-Term Study of Young Children’s Rapport, Social Emulation, and Language Learning With a Peer-Like Robot Playmate in Preschool. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 61(September), 1–17. 10.3389/frobt.2019.00081
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00081 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2019b) Exploring the Effects of a Social Robot’s Speech Entrainment and Backstory on Young Children’s Emotion, Rapport, Relationship, and Learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 61(July). 10.3389/frobt.2019.00054
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00054 [Google Scholar]
  34. Landrum, A. R., Eaves, B. S., & Shafto, P.
    (2015) Learning to trust and trusting to learn: a theoretical framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 109–111. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  35. Landrum, A. R., Mills, C. M., & Johnston, A. M.
    (2013) When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children’s trust more than expertise. Developmental Science, 16(4), 622–638. 10.1111/desc.12059
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12059 [Google Scholar]
  36. Landrum, A. R., Pflaum, A. D., & Mills, C. M.
    (2016) Inducing Knowledgeability From Niceness: Children Use Social Features for Making Epistemic Inferences. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(5), 699–717. 10.1080/15248372.2015.1135799
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2015.1135799 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leite, I., Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A.
    (2014) Empathic Robots for Long-term Interaction: Evaluating Social Presence, Engagement and Perceived Support in Children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3), 329–341. 10.1007/s12369‑014‑0227‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0227-1 [Google Scholar]
  38. Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A.
    (2013) Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 291–308. 10.1007/s12369‑013‑0178‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y [Google Scholar]
  39. Lemaignan, S., Fink, J., Mondada, F., & Dillenbourg, P.
    (2015) You’re doing it wrong! studying unexpected behaviors in child-robot interaction. International conference on social robotics (pp.390–400). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑25554‑5_39
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_39 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ligthart, M., Neerincx, M. A., Bindsbergen, K. L. A. V., & Grootenhuis, M. A.
    (2019) A Child and a Robot Getting Acquainted – Interaction Design for Eliciting Self-Disclosure. Proc. of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi- agent Systems (AAMAS 2019), 8–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Looije, R., Neerincx, M. A., & de Lange, V.
    (2008) Children’s responses and opinion on three bots that motivate, educate and play. Journal of Physical Agents (JoPha), 2(2), 13–20. 10.14198/JoPha.2008.2.2.03
     https://doi.org/10.14198/JoPha.2008.2.2.03 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mair, P., & Wilcox, R.
    (2020) Robust statistical methods in R using the WRS2 package. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 464–488. 10.3758/s13428‑019‑01246‑w
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w [Google Scholar]
  43. Malle, B. F., & Ullman, D.
    (2021) A Multi-Dimensional Conception and Measure of Human-Robot Trust. Trust in human-robot interaction: research and applications, 3–25. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑819472‑0.00001‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819472-0.00001-0 [Google Scholar]
  44. Manzi, F., Peretti, G., Di Dio, C., Cangelosi, A., Itakura, S., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Massaro, D., & Marchetti, A.
    (2020) A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children’s Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 111 (September), 1–12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mascarenhas, S., Melo, F. S., & Paiva, A.
    (2018) Exploring the Impact of Fault Justification in Human-Robot Trust. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2018) (2018) 507–513, 507–513.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Melson, G. F., Kahn, P. H., Beck, A., Friedman, B., Roberts, T., Garrett, E., & Gill, B. T.
    (2009) Children’s behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 92–102. 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mirnig, N., Stollnberger, G., Miksch, M., Stadler, S., Giuliani, M., & Tscheligi, M.
    (2017) To Err Is Robot: How Humans Assess and Act toward an Erroneous Social Robot. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 41, 1–15. 10.3389/frobt.2017.00021
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00021 [Google Scholar]
  48. Obaid, M., Aylett, R., Barendregt, W., Basedow, C., Corrigan, L. J., Hall, L., Jones, A., Kappas, A., Küster, D., Paiva, A., Papadopoulos, F., Serholt, S., & Castellano, G.
    (2018) Endowing a Robotic Tutor with Empathic Qualities: Design and Pilot Evaluation. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 15(06), 1850025. 10.1142/S0219843618500251
     https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843618500251 [Google Scholar]
  49. Papert, S.
    (1980) Childern, Computer, and Powerful Ideas 2nd Edition. MINDSTORMS: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, 19–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Primo Toys
    Primo Toys (2017) Beginning computer programming for kids. www.primotoys.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Ebook-PrimoToys_final-1.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K.
    (2015) Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction – HRI ’15, 141–148. 10.1145/2696454.2696497
     https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696497 [Google Scholar]
  52. Saylor, M. M., Somanader, M. C., Levin, D. T., & Kawamura, K.
    (2010) How do young children deal with hybrids of living and non-living things: The case of humanoid robots. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 835–851. 10.1348/026151009X481049
     https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X481049 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sebo, S. S., Krishnamurthi, P., & Scassellati, B.
    (2019) “i don’t believe you”: investigating the effects of robot trust violation and repair. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2019-March, 57–65. 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673169
     https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673169 [Google Scholar]
  54. Serholt, S., Pareto, L., Ekström, S., & Ljungblad, S.
    (2020) Trouble and Repair in Child-Robot Interaction: A Study of Complex Interactions With a Robot Tutee in a Primary School Classroom. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 71(April), 1–13. 10.3389/frobt.2020.00046
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00046 [Google Scholar]
  55. Severson, R. L., & Carlson, S. M.
    (2010) Behaving as or behaving as if? Children’s conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 1099–1103. 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  56. Smakman, M., Vogt, P., & Konijn, E. A.
    (2021) Moral considerations on social robots in education: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Computers & Education, 1741, 104317. 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104317
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104317 [Google Scholar]
  57. Somanader, M. C., Saylor, M. M., & Levin, D. T.
    (2011) Remote control and children’s understanding of robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109 (2), 239–247. 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sommer, K., Davidson, R., Armitage, K. L., Slaughter, V., Wiles, J., & Nielsen, M.
    (2020) Preschool children overimitate robots, but do so less than they overimitate humans. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1911, 104702. 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104702
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104702 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sommer, K., Slaughter, V., Wiles, J., Owen, K., Chiba, A. A., Forster, D., Malmir, M., & Nielsen, M.
    (2021) Can a robot teach me that? children’s ability to imitate robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2031, 105040. 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105040
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105040 [Google Scholar]
  60. Stower, R., Calvo-Barajas, N., Castellano, G., & Kappas, A.
    (2021) A meta-analysis on children’s trust in social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 10.1007/s12369‑020‑00736‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00736-8 [Google Scholar]
  61. Stower, R., & Kappas, A.
    (2020) “oh no , my instructions were wrong !” an exploratory pilot towards children’s trust in social robots. The 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication, 641–646. 10.1109/RO‑MAN47096.2020.9223495
     https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223495 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2021) CozmoNAOts : Designing an Autonomous Learning Task with Social and Educational Robots. Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’21), June 24–30, 2021, Athens, Greece, 1 (1), 1–8. 10.1145/3459990.3465210
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3465210 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tielman, M., Neerincx, M., Meyer, J.-J., & Looije, R.
    (2014) Adaptive emotional expression in robot-child interaction. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction – HRI ’14, 407–414. 10.1145/2559636.2559663
     https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559663 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tolksdorf, N. F., & Rohlfing, K. J.
    (2020) Parents’ views on using social robots for language learning. 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 634–640. 10.1109/RO‑MAN47096.2020.9223540
     https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223540 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tolksdorf, N. F., Siebert, S., Zorn, I., Horwath, I., & Rohlfing, K. J.
    (2021) Ethical considerations of applying robots in kindergarten settings: towards an approach from a macroperspective. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(2), 129–140. 10.1007/s12369‑020‑00622‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00622-3 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tolmeijer, S., Weiss, A., Hanheide, M., Lindner, F., Powers, T. M., Dixon, C., & Tielman, M. L.
    (2020) Taxonomy of trust-relevant failures and mitigation strategies. Proceedings of the 2020 acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp.3–12). Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/3319502.3374793
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374793 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tong, Y., Wang, F., & Danovitch, J.
    (2020) The role of epistemic and social characteristics in children’s selective trust: Three meta-analyses. Developmental Science, 23(2), 1–18. 10.1111/desc.12895
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12895 [Google Scholar]
  68. van den Berghe, R., de Haas, M., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Krahmer, E., Verhagen, J., Vogt, P., Willemsen, B., de Wit, J., & Leseman, P.
    (2020) A toy or a friend? Children’s anthropomorphic beliefs about robots and how these relate to second-language word learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (September 2019), 1–15. 10.1111/jcal.12497
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12497 [Google Scholar]
  69. van Straten, C. L., Kühne, R., Peter, J., de Jong, C., & Barco, A.
    (2020) Closeness, trust, and perceived social support in child-robot relationship formation. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 21 (1), 57–84. 10.1075/is.18052.str
     https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18052.str [Google Scholar]
  70. van Straten, C. L., Peter, J., Kühne, R., & Barco, A.
    (2021) The wizard and I: How transparent teleoperation and self-description (do not) affect children’s robot perceptions and child-robot relationship formation. AI and Society, (0123456789). 10.1007/s00146‑021‑01202‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01202-3 [Google Scholar]
  71. van Straten, C. L., Peter, J., Kühne, R., de Jong, C., & Barco, A.
    (2018) Technological and Interpersonal Trust in Child-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction – HAI ’18, 253–259. 10.1145/3284432.3284440
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3284432.3284440 [Google Scholar]
  72. van Waveren, S., Carter, E. J., & Leite, I.
    (2019) Take one for the team: the effects of error severity in collaborative tasks with social robots. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 151–158. 10.1145/3308532.3329475
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3308532.3329475 [Google Scholar]
  73. Vollmer, A.-L., Read, R., Trippas, D., & Belpaeme, T.
    (2018) Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat7111. 10.1126/scirobotics.aat7111
     https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat7111 [Google Scholar]
  74. Weiss, A., Scherndl, T., Buchner, R., & Tscheligi, M.
    (2010) A robot as persuasive social actor a field trial on child-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction – A Symposium at the AISB 2010 Convention, 136–142.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Westlund, J. M. K., Park, H. W., Williams, R., & Breazeal, C.
    (2018) Measuring young children’s long-term relationships with social robots. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children – IDC ’18, 207–218. 10.1145/3202185.3202732
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202732 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J.
    (1977) the Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship To Self-Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250–257. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1977.tb00523.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x [Google Scholar]
  77. Wood, L. J., Dautenhahn, K., Lehmann, H., Robins, B., Rainer, A., & Syrdal, D. S.
    (2013) Robot-mediated interviews : Does a robotic interviewer impact question difficulty and information recovery?Assistive Technology : From Research to Practice, proceedings of the AAATE 2013 Conference.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Wood, L. J., Dautenhahn, K., Rainer, A., Robins, B., Lehmann, H., & Syrdal, D. S.
    (2013) Robot-Mediated Interviews – How Effective Is a Humanoid Robot as a Tool for Interviewing Young Children? (M. Slater, Ed.). PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59448. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059448
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059448 [Google Scholar]
  79. Yadollahi, E., Couto, M., Dillenbourg, P., & Paiva, A.
    (2020) Can you guide me?: Supporting children’s spatial perspective taking through games with robots. Extended Abstracts – Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, IDC 2020, (June), 217–222. 10.1145/3397617.3397831
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3397617.3397831 [Google Scholar]
  80. Yadollahi, E., Johal, W., Paiva, A., & Dillenbourg, P.
    (2018) When deictic gestures in a robot can harm child-robot collaboration. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children – IDC ’18, 195–206. 10.1145/3202185.3202743
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202743 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/is.21034.sto
Loading
Exploring space for robot mistakes in child robot interactions
Interaction Studies 23, 243 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/is.21034.sto
/content/journals/10.1075/is.21034.sto
/content/journals/10.1075/is.21034.sto
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency; child-robot-interaction; education; faulty robots; human-robot-interaction; in-the-wild; liking; robot errors; trust; user study

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error