1887
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Backchannel choices affect conversational development. Some backchannels invite interlocutors to continue to the next part of what they are saying and others invite them to elaborate on what they have just said. We tested how communicative modality (audiovisual, audio, text), environmental setting (wholly in-lab, partially in the wild), and conversational goals (on-task, off-task) influenced backchannel usage by participants. We found that backchannel production depends on modality, setting, and goals. For example, we found that specific backchannels played a more prominent role in self-motivated dialogue. Knowledge of how backchannels are used has both theoretical and practical implications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.21036.ngu
2024-06-07
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H.
    (2003) Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 271(2003), 195–225. 10.1207/s15516709cog2702_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2702_3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T.
    (2000) Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.6.941
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryant, G. A.
    (2010) Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545–566. 10.1080/01638530903531972
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903531972 [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge university press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E.
    (1991) Grounding in communication. InL. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.127–149). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10096‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F.
    (1989) Contributing to discourse. Cognitive science, 13(2), 259–294. 10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7 [Google Scholar]
  7. D’Arcey, J. T., Oraby, S., & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2019) Wait signals predict sarcasm in online debates. Dialogue & Discourse, 10(2), 56–78. 10.5087/dad.2019.203
    https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2019.203 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dideriksen, C., Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K., Dingemanse, M., & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2019) Contextualizing conversational strategies: Backchannel, repair and linguistic alignment in spontaneous and task-oriented conversations. InA. K. Goel, C. M. Seifert, & C. Freksa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2019) (pp.261–267). Montreal, QB: Cognitive Science Society. 10.31234/osf.io/fd8y9
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fd8y9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Drummond, K., & Hopper, R.
    (1993) Back channels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on language and Social Interaction, 26(2), 157–177. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_3 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2015) Discourse markers in writing. Discourse Studies, 17(1), 64–82. 10.1177/1461445614557758
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614557758 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox Tree, J. E. & Clark, N. B.
    (2013) Communicative effectiveness of written versus spoken feedback. Discourse Processes, 50(5), 339–359. 10.1080/0163853X.2013.797241
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.797241 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fox Tree, J. E., Mayer, S. A., & Betts, T. E.
    (2011) Grounding in instant messaging. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 455–475. 10.2190/EC.45.4.e
    https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.4.e [Google Scholar]
  13. Fox Tree, J. E., Whittaker, S., Herring, S. C., Chowdhury, Y., Nguyen, A., & Takayama, L.
    (2021) Psychological distance in mobile telepresence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1511, 102629. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102629
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102629 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9(2/3), 205–217. 10.1007/BF00148127
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148127 [Google Scholar]
  15. Grice, H. P.
    (1975) Logic and conversation. InSpeech acts (pp.41–58). Brill. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Guydish, A., D’Arcey, J. T., Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2021) Reciprocity in conversation. Language and Speech, 64(4), 859–872. 10.1177/0023830920972742
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920972742 [Google Scholar]
  17. Guydish, A., & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2021) Good conversations: Grounding, convergence, and richness. New Ideas in Psychology, 631. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100877
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100877 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2022) Reciprocity in instant messaging conversations. Language and Speech, 65(2), 404–417. 10.1177/00238309211025070
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211025070 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jucker, A. H. & Smith, S. W.
    (1998) “And people just you know like ‘wow’”: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. InAndreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (Eds.), Discourse Markers: Description and Theory, 171–201. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.10juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.10juc [Google Scholar]
  20. Jurafsky, D., Bates, R., Coccaro, N., Martin, R., Meteer, M., Ries, K., … & Van Ess-Dykema, C.
    (1997) Automatic detection of discourse structure for speech recognition and understanding. In1997 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Proceedings (pp.88–95). IEEE. 10.1109/ASRU.1997.658992
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ASRU.1997.658992 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W.
    (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. 10.1037/0003‑066X.39.10.1123
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 [Google Scholar]
  22. Knudsen, B., Creemers, A., & Meyer, A. S.
    (2020) Forgotten little words: How backchannels and particles may facilitate speech planning in conversation?Frontiers in Psychology, 111. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593671
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593671 [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, H. Z.
    (1999) Grounding and information communication in intercultural and intracultural dyadic discourse. Discourse Processes, 28(3), 195–215. 10.1080/01638539909545081
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545081 [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, K., D’Arcey, J. T., Walker, M., & Tree, J. F.
    (2021) Referential Communication Between Friends and Strangers in the Wild. Dialogue & Discourse, 12(1), 45–72. 10.5210/dad.2021.103
    https://doi.org/10.5210/dad.2021.103 [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, K., Fox Tree, J. E., & Walker, M. A.
    (2016) Coordinating Communication in the Wild: The Artwalk Dialogue Corpus of Pedestrian Navigation and Mobile Referential Communication. InProceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Paatsch, L. E., & Toe, D. M.
    (2014) A comparison of pragmatic abilities of children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their hearing peers. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 19(1), 1–19. 10.1093/deafed/ent030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ent030 [Google Scholar]
  27. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1982) Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. InTannen, Deborah (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, (pp.71–93). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tolins, J., & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2014) Addressee backchannels steer narrative development. Journal of Pragmatics, 701, 152–164. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2016) Overhearers use addressee backchannels in dialog comprehension. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1412–1434. 10.1111/cogs.12278
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12278 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tolins, J., Namiranian, N., Akhtar, N., & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2017) The role of addressee backchannels and conversational grounding in vicarious word learning in four-year-olds. First Language, 37(6), 648–671. 10.1177/0142723717727407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723717727407 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tolins, J., Zeamer, C., & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2018) Overhearing dialogues and monologues: How does entrainment lead to more comprehensible referring expressions?Discourse Processes, 55(7), 545–565. 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1279516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1279516 [Google Scholar]
  32. Yngve, V. H.
    (1970) On getting a word in edgewise. InM. A. Campbell (Ed.), Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp.567–578). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.21036.ngu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.21036.ngu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error