1887
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Many studies have shown that using robot platforms can be effective for teaching children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The aim of this study was to compare performance on an imitation task, as well as focus attention levels and the presence of social behaviours of children with ASD and typically developing (TD) children during an imitation task under two different conditions, with robots and human demonstrators. The results suggested that TD children did not imitate more than children with ASD. Children with ASD did not imitate the robot more than they imitated a person, but they showed more focused attention to robots and expressed more social behaviours in interaction with the robots. Behaviours that were significantly more present in ASD children than in TD children included touching the robot in the robot demonstrator condition and focusing on the robot in the person demonstrator condition. This implies a possible preference of children with ASD towards robots rather than towards people.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.21037.sim
2022-10-20
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association
    American Psychiatric Association (2014) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition – DSM-5. American Psychiatric Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anzalone, S. M., Tilmont, E., Boucenna, S., Xavier, J., Jouen, A.-L., Bodeau, N., Maharatna, K., Chetouani, M., & Cohen, D.
    (2014) How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3D+time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(7), 814–826. 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aryania, A., Aghdasi, H. S., Beccaluva, E. A., & Bonarini, A.
    (2020) Social engagement of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in imitating a humanoid robot: A case study. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6). 10.1007/s42452‑020‑2802‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2802-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aryania, A., Aghdasi, H. S., Heshmati, R., & Bonarini, A.
    (2021) Robust risk-averse multi-armed bandits with application in social engagement behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder while imitating a humanoid robot. Information Sciences, 573, 194–221. 10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.067
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.067 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barr, R., & Hayne, H.
    (2003) It’s not what you know, it’s who you know: Older siblings facilitate imitation during infancy. International Journal of Early Years Education, 11(1), 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartl-Pokorny, K. D., Pykala, M., Uluer, P., Barkana, D. E., Baird, A., Kose, H., Zorcec, T., Robins, B., Schuller, B. W., & Landowska, A.
    (2021) Robot-based intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9, 165433–165450. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3132785
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3132785 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bird, G., Leighton, J., Press, C., & Heyes, C.
    (2007) Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 274(1628), 3027–3031. 10.1098/rspb.2007.1019
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1019 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaminade, T., Fonseca, D. D., Rosset, D., Lutcher, E., Cheng, G., & Deruelle, C.
    (2012) FMRI study of young adults with autism interacting with a humanoid robot. In2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (pp.380–385). IEEE. 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343782
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343782 [Google Scholar]
  9. Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Baird, G., Cox, A., & Drew, A.
    (2000) Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 481–498. 10.1016/S0885‑2014(01)00037‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00037-5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chevalier, P., Kompatsiari, K., Ciardo, F., & Wykowska, A.
    (2020) Examining joint attention with the use of humanoid robots-A new approach to study fundamental mechanisms of social cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(2), 217–236. 10.3758/s13423‑019‑01689‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01689-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chevalier, P., Raiola, G., Martin, J., Isableu, B., Bazile, C., & Tapus, A.
    (2017) Do sensory preferences of children with autism impact an lmitation task with a robot?In2017 12th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp.177–186). IEEE.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chung, E. Y.-H.
    (2021) Robot-mediated social skill intervention programme for children with autism spectrum disorder: An ABA time-series study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(5), 1095–1107. 10.1007/s12369‑020‑00699‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00699-w [Google Scholar]
  13. Costa, A. P., Charpiot, L., Lera, F. R., Ziafati, P., Nazarikhorram, A., van der Torre, L., & Steffgen, G.
    (2018) A comparison between a person and a robot in the attention, imitation, and repetitive and stereotypical behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorder. InProceedings workshop on social human-robot interaction of human-care service robots at HRI2018 (pp.1–4).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Duquette, A., Michaud, F., & Mercier, H.
    (2008) Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Autonomous Robots, 24(2), 147–157. 10.1007/s10514‑007‑9056‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9056-5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Feil-Seifer, D., & Mataric, M. J.
    (2005) Defining socially assistive robotics. In9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2005 ICORR 2005 (pp.465–468). IEEE. 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2009) Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. InO. Khatib, V. Kumar, & G. J. Pappas (Eds.), Experimental robotics (pp.201–210). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑00196‑3_24
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00196-3_24 [Google Scholar]
  17. Huijnen, C. A. G. J., Lexis, M. A. S., Jansens, R., & de Witte, L. P.
    (2016) Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 2100–2114. 10.1007/s10803‑016‑2740‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2740-6 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2017) How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(10), 3079–3096. 10.1007/s10803‑017‑3235‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3235-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Huskens, B., Palmen, A., Van der Werff, M., Lourens, T., & Barakova, E.
    (2015) Improving collaborative play between children with autism spectrum disorders and their siblings: The effectiveness of a robot-mediated intervention based on lego® therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(11), 3746–3755. 10.1007/s10803‑014‑2326‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2326-0 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hwang, B., & Hughes, C.
    (2000) Increasing early social-communicative skills of preverbal preschool children with autism through social interactive training. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25(1), 18–28. 10.2511/rpsd.25.1.18
    https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.25.1.18 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ingersoll, B.
    (2008) The social role of imitation in autism: Implications for the treatment of imitation deficits. Infants & Young Children, 21(2), 107–119. 10.1097/01.IYC.0000314482.24087.14
    https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000314482.24087.14 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ingersoll, B., & Gergans, S.
    (2007) The effect of a parent-implemented imitation intervention on spontaneous imitation skills in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 163–175. 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2006.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ingersoll, B., Lewis, E., & Kroman, E.
    (2007) Teaching the imitation and spontaneous use of descriptive gestures in young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(8), 1446–1456. 10.1007/s10803‑006‑0221‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0221-z [Google Scholar]
  24. Ingersoll, B., & Meyer, K.
    (2011) Do object and gesture imitation skills represent independent dimensions in autism?Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23(5), 421–431. 10.1007/s10882‑011‑9237‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-011-9237-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ingersoll, B., & Schreibman, L.
    (2006) Teaching reciprocal imitation skills to young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral approach: Effects on language, pretend play, and joint attention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(4), 487–505. 10.1007/s10803‑006‑0089‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0089-y [Google Scholar]
  26. Jouaiti, M., & Hénaff, P.
    (2019) Robot-based motor rehabilitation in autism: A systematic review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(5), 753–764. 10.1007/s12369‑019‑00598‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00598-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., & Scassellati, B.
    (2013) Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(5), 1038–1049. 10.1007/s10803‑012‑1645‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1645-2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, S., Hirokawa, M., Matsuda, S., Funahashi, A., & Suzuki, K.
    (2021) Smiles as a signal of prosocial behaviors toward the robot in the therapeutic setting for children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 599755. 10.3389/frobt.2021.599755
    https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.599755 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., Bishop, S. L.
    (2012) Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Modules 1–4, Second Edition [Manual]. Western Psychological Services.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Maljaars, J., Noens, I., Jansen, R., Scholte, E., & van Berckelaer-Onnes, I.
    (2011) Intentional communication in nonverbal and verbal low-functioning children with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(6), 601–614. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  31. McEwen, F., Happé, F., Bolton, P., Rijsdijk, F., Ronald, A., Dworzynski, K., & Plomin, R.
    (2007) Origins of individual differences in imitation: Links with language, pretend play, and socially insightful behavior in two-year-old twins. Child Development, 78(2), 474–492. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01010.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01010.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Peca, A., Simut, R., Pintea, S., & Vanderborght, B.
    (2015) Are children with ASD more prone to test the intentions of the robonova robot compared to a human?International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), 629–639. 10.1007/s12369‑015‑0317‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0317-8 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pennisi, P., Tonacci, A., Tartarisco, G., Billeci, L., Ruta, L., Gangemi, S., & Pioggia, G.
    (2016) Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, 9(2), 165–183. 10.1002/aur.1527
    https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1527 [Google Scholar]
  34. Petric, F., Hrvatinić, K., Babić, A., Malovan, L., Miklić, D., Kovačić, Z., Cepanec, M., Stošić, J., & Šimleša, S.
    (2014) Four tasks of a robot-assisted autism spectrum disorder diagnostic protocol: First clinical tests. InIEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC 2014) (pp.510–517). IEEE. 10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970331
    https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970331 [Google Scholar]
  35. Petric, F., Miklić, D., Cepanec, M., Cvitanović, P., & Kovačić, Z.
    (2017) Functional imitation task in the context of robot-assisted autism spectrum disorder diagnostics: Preliminary investigations. In2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) (pp.1471–1478). IEEE. 10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172498
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172498 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pierno, A. C., Mari, M., Lusher, D., & Castiello, U.
    (2008) Robotic movement elicits visuomotor priming in children with autism. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 448–454. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.020 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pioggia, G., Igliozzi, R., Sica, M. L., Ferro, M., Muratori, F., Ahluwalia, A., & De Rossi, D.
    (2008) Exploring emotional and imitational android-based interactions in autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation, 1(1), 49–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Poon, K. K., Watson, L. R., Baranek, G. T., & Poe, M. D.
    (2012) To what extent do joint attention, imitation, and object play behaviors in infancy predict later communication and intellectual functioning in ASD?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(6), 1064–1074. 10.1007/s10803‑011‑1349‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1349-z [Google Scholar]
  39. Ranatunga, I., Beltran, M., Torres, N. A., Bugnariu, N., Patterson, R. M., Garver, C., & Popa, D. O.
    (2013) Human-robot upper body gesture imitation analysis for autism spectrum disorders. InG. Herrmann, M. J. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, & U. Leonards (Eds.), Social robotics ICSR 2013. Lecture notes in computer science (pp.218–228). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02675‑6_22
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_22 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rice, C. E., Adamson, L. B., Winner, E., & McGee, G. G.
    (2016) A cross-sectional study of shared attention by children with autism and typically developing children in an inclusive preschool setting. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(3), 245–265. 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000099
    https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000099 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rogers, S. J., & Pennington, B. F.
    (1991) A theoretical approach to the deficits in infantile autism. Development and Psychopathology, 3(2), 137–162. 10.1017/S0954579400000043
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400000043 [Google Scholar]
  42. Scassellati, B., Henny, A., & Matarić, M.
    (2012) Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14(1), 275–294. 10.1146/annurev‑bioeng‑071811‑150036
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shamsuddin, S., Yussof, H., Ismail, L. I., Mohamed, S., Hanapiah, F. A., & Zahari, N. I.
    (2012) Humanoid robot NAO interacting with autistic children of moderately impaired intelligence to augment communication skills. Procedia Engineering, 41, 1533–1538. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.346
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.346 [Google Scholar]
  44. Simut, R. E., Vanderfaeillie, J., Peca, A., Van de Perre, G., & Vanderborght, B.
    (2016) Children with autism spectrum disorders make a fruit salad with Probo, the social robot: an interaction study. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 46(1), 113–126. 10.1007/s10803‑015‑2556‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2556-9 [Google Scholar]
  45. Taheri, A., Meghdari, A., & Mahoor, M. H.
    (2020) A close look at the imitation performance of children with autism and typically developing children using a robotic system. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(5), 1125–1147. 10.1007/s12369‑020‑00704‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00704-2 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tapus, A., Mataric, M., & Scassellati, B.
    (2007) Socially assistive robotics [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14(1), 35–42. 10.1109/MRA.2007.339605
    https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2007.339605 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tapus, A., Peca, A., Aly, A., A. Pop, C., Jisa, L., Pintea, S., Rusu, A. S., & David, D. O.
    (2012) Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments. Interaction Studies, 13(3), 315–347. 10.1075/is.13.3.01tap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.13.3.01tap [Google Scholar]
  48. Toth, K., Munson, J., Meltzoff, A. N., & Dawson, G.
    (2006) Early predictors of communication development in young children with autism spectrum disorder: Joint attention, imitation, and toy play. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(8), 993–1005. 10.1007/s10803‑006‑0137‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0137-7 [Google Scholar]
  49. Uzgiris, I. C.
    (1981) Two functions of imitation during infancy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4(1), 1–12. 10.1177/016502548100400101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548100400101 [Google Scholar]
  50. Vanderborght, B., Simut, R., Saldien, J., A. Pop, C., Rusu, A. S., Pintea, S., Lefeber, D., & David, D. O.
    (2012) Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interaction Studies, 13(3), 348–372. 10.1075/is.13.3.02van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.13.3.02van [Google Scholar]
  51. Vivanti, G., & Hamilton, A.
    (2014) Imitation in autism spectrum disorder. InF. R. Volkmar, S. J. Rogers, R. Paul, & K. A. Pelphrey (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders: Diagnosis, development, and brain mechanisms (pp.278–301). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Warren, Z., Zheng, Z., Das, S., Young, E. M., Swanson, A., Weitlauf, A., & Sarkar, N.
    (2015) Brief report: Development of a robotic intervention platform for young children with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3870–3876. 10.1007/s10803‑014‑2334‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2334-0 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wild, K. S., Poliakoff, E., Jerrison, A., & Gowen, E.
    (2012) Goal-directed and goal-less imitation in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(8), 1739–1749. 10.1007/s10803‑011‑1417‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1417-4 [Google Scholar]
  54. Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., & Singh, T.
    (2004) A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(3), 285–299. 10.1023/B:JADD.0000029551.56735.3a
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000029551.56735.3a [Google Scholar]
  55. Zheng, Z., Young, E. M., Swanson, A. R., Weitlauf, A. S., Warren, Z. E., & Sarkar, N.
    (2016) Robot-mediated imitation skill training for children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 24(6), 682–691. 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2475724
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2475724 [Google Scholar]
  56. Zubak, I., Kovačić, Z., Petric, F., Stošić, J., Cepanec, M., & Šimleša, S.
    (2018) Reaction to robots in social and non-social contexts – comparison of children with autism spectrum disorders and their typical peers. Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istraživanja, 54(2), 28–38. 10.31299/hrri.54.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.31299/hrri.54.2.3 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.21037.sim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.21037.sim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): autism spectrum disorder; humanoid robot; imitation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error