Coordination between vehicles in traffic

References

1. Arminen, I.
   (2017) Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315252209
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315252209 [Google Scholar]
2. Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A.
   (2016) Respecifying mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 290–309. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614 [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, B., & Laurier, E.
   (2017, May). The trouble with autopilots: Assisted and autonomous driving on the social road. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.416–429). ACM. 10.1145/3025453.3025462
   https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025462 [Google Scholar]
4. Dant, T.
   (2004) The driver-car. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 61–79. 10.1177/0263276404046061
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046061 [Google Scholar]
5. Department of Transportation
   Department of Transportation (2007) Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment. Federal Register, 72(232), p.711). Retrieved at: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/07-5644/p-711
   [Google Scholar]
6. Deppermann, A., Laurier, E., Mondada, L., Broth, M., Cromdal, J., De Stefani, E., Haddington, P., Levin, L., Nevile, M., and Rauniomaa, M.
   (2018) Overtaking as an interactional achievement: video analyses of participants’ practices in traffic. Gesprächsforschung191, 1–131.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DeStefani, E., Gazin, A. D.
   (2014) Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics651, 63–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020 [Google Scholar]
8. European Union
   European Union (2019) Acts adopted by bodies created by international agreements: Regulation No 48 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the installation of lighting and light-signaling devices [2019/57]. Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2019.014.01.0042.01.ENG
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gamberini, L., & Spagnolli, A.
   (2015) An Action-Based Approach to Presence: Foundations and Methods. InImmersed in Media (pp.101–114). Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10190‑3_6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10190-3_6 [Google Scholar]
10. Grice, Paul
    (1975) Logic and conversation. InCole, P., Morgan, J. (eds.). Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. pp.41–58. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
11. Guo, Y., Li, Z., Wu, Y., & Xu, C.
    (2018) Exploring unobserved heterogeneity in bicyclists’ red-light running behaviors at different crossing facilities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1151, 118–127. 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.006 [Google Scholar]
12. Haddington, P.
    (2010) Turn-taking for turn-taking: Mobility, time and action in the sequential organization of junction-negotiations in cars. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 372–400. 10.1080/08351813.2010.518068
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.518068 [Google Scholar]
13. Haddington, P.
    (2012) Movement in action: Initiating social navigation in cars. Semiotica, 1911, 137–167. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0059
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0059 [Google Scholar]
14. Haddington, P., & Rauniomaa, M.
    (2014) Interaction between road users: offering space in traffic. Space and culture, 17(2), 176–190. 10.1177/1206331213508498
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508498 [Google Scholar]
15. Hanks, P.
    (1990) Referential practice. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kauffmann, N., Winkler, F., & Vollrath, M.
    (2018) What Makes an Automated Vehicle a Good Driver?. InProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p.168). ACM. 10.1145/3173574.3173742
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173742 [Google Scholar]
17. Laurier, E., Lorimer, H., Brown, B., Jones, O., Juhlin, O., Noble, A., ... & Weilenmann, A.
    (2008) Driving and ‘passengering’: Notes on the ordinary organization of car travel. Mobilities, 3(1), 1–23. 10.1080/17450100701797273
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100701797273 [Google Scholar]
18. Laurier, E.
    (2013) Before, in and after: Cars making their way through roundabouts. InHaddington, P., Mondada, L. (2014) The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 137–156.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Laurier, E.
    (2019) Civility and mobility: drivers (and passengers) appreciating the actions of other drivers. Language & Communication65 (2019): 79–91. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.006 [Google Scholar]
20. Lee, T. C., Polak, J. W., Bell, M. G., & Wigan, M. R.
    (2012) The kinematic features of motorcycles in congested urban networks. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 491, 203–211. 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.002 [Google Scholar]
21. Levin, L., Cromdal, J., Broth, M., Gazin, A. D., Haddington, P., McIlvenny, P., Melander, H., & Rauniomaa, M.
    (2017) Unpacking corrections in mobile instruction: Error-occasioned learning opportunities in driving, cycling and aviation training. Linguistics and Education, 381, 11–23. 10.1016/j.linged.2016.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.10.002 [Google Scholar]
22. Levinson, S. C.
    (2003) Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity (Vol.51). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
23. McIlvenny, P., Broth, M., and Haddington, P.
    (2014) Moving together: Mobile formations in interaction. Space and culture, 17(2), 104–106. 10.1177/1206331213508679
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508679 [Google Scholar]
24. Merlino, S., Mondada, L.
    (2018) Crossing the street: How pedestrians interact with cars. Language & Communication, 651, 131–147. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.004 [Google Scholar]
25. Monahan, T., & Fisher, J. A.
    (2010) Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field. Qualitative research, 10(3), 357–376. 10.1177/1468794110362874
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110362874 [Google Scholar]
26. Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M.
    (Eds.) (2013) Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp.212–242). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Perterer, N., Meerwald-Stadler, S., Trösterer, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., & Tscheligi, M.
    (2018) Follow Me: Exploring Strategies and Challenges for Collaborative Driving. InB. Donmez, B. N. Walker and P. Froehlich (eds). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp.176–187). New York: ACM. 10.1145/3239060.3239088
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239088 [Google Scholar]
28. Pink, S., Fors, V., & Glöss, M.
    (2019) Automated futures and the mobile present: In-car video ethnographies. Ethnography, 20(1), 88–107. 10.1177/1466138117735621
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138117735621 [Google Scholar]
29. Risto, M., Emmenegger, C., Vinkhuyzen, E., Cefkin, M. & Hollan, J.
    (2017) Human-Vehicle Interfaces: The Power of Vehicle Movement Gestures in Human Road User Coordination. InProceedings of the Ninth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. 10.17077/drivingassessment.1633
    https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1633 [Google Scholar]
30. Sagberg, F., Selpi Bianchi Piccinini, G. F., & Engström, J.
    (2015) A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Human factors, 57(7), 1248–1275. 10.1177/0018720815591313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815591313 [Google Scholar]
31. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse processes, 23(3), 499–545. 10.1080/01638539709545001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001 [Google Scholar]
32. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol.11). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
33. Scott-Parker, B., & Weston, L.
    (2017) Sensitivity to reward and risky driving, risky decision making, and risky health behaviour: A literature review. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 491, 93–109. 10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.008 [Google Scholar]
34. Smith, R. J.
    (2017) Membership categorisation, category-relevant spaces, and perception-in-action: The case of disputes between cyclists and drivers. Journal of Pragmatics, 1181, 120–133. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.007 [Google Scholar]
35. Terasaki, A.
    (2004) Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. InG. Lerner (ed) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.125–171), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.11ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.11ter [Google Scholar]
36. van Nes, N., Christoph, M., Hoedemaeker, M., & van der Horst, R. A.
    (2013) The value of site-based observations complementary to naturalistic driving observations: A pilot study on the right turn maneuver. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 581, 318–329. 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.026 [Google Scholar]
37. Vanderbilt, T.
    (2008) Traffic. Why we drive the way we do (and what it says about us). New York: A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Vinkhuyzen, E., and Cefkin, M.
    (2016) Developing socially acceptable autonomous vehicles.” InEthnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, pp.522–534 2016 10.1111/1559‑8918.2016.01108
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2016.01108 [Google Scholar]
39. Vissers, L. K., van der Schagen, S., & INLG van & Hagenzieker, M. P.
    (2016) Safe interaction between cyclists, pedestrians and automated vehicles: what do we know and what do we need to know?SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, R-2016-16, library.swov.nl/action/front/fulltext?id=131121
    [Google Scholar]