1887
Volume 24, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381

Abstract

Abstract

Previous research shows that females use more exclamation marks than males, often to establish rapport. The purpose of the present studies was to test whether people associate texters’ use of exclamation marks with friendliness and femaleness. If this association is due to normative expectations, we hypothesized that females would appear less friendly if they did not use an exclamation mark in texting. In Study 1, participants rated a texter using an exclamation mark to be highly female and highly friendly. The gender results disappeared when friendliness was controlled for. In Study 2, we tested whether friendliness ratings decreased if texters violated gender-associated punctuation. Participants rated a texter with a gendered name on friendliness. Regardless of gender, participants inferred greater friendliness to texters using an exclamation mark. That is, there was no evidence of a cost for violating this gender expectation. We conclude that people predict that a texter using an exclamation mark is likely to be female, but do not penalize females for not using an exclamation mark.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.22054.nic
2024-02-15
2024-10-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/is.22054.nic.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/is.22054.nic&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baron, N. S. & Ling, R.
    (2011) Necessary smileys & useless periods. Visible Language, 451, 45–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Briton, N. J. & Hall, J. A.
    (1995) Gender-based expectancies and observer judgments of smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19(1), 49–65. 10.1007/BF02173412
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173412 [Google Scholar]
  3. Colley, A., Todd, Z., Bland, M., Holmes, M., Khanom, N., & Pike, H.
    (2004) Style and content in e-mails and letters to male and female friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(3), 369–378. 10.1177/0261927X04266812
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04266812 [Google Scholar]
  4. Darley, W. K. & Luethge, D. J.
    (2019) Service value and retention: Does gender matter?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 481, 178–185. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Lemus, S., Spears, R., & Moya, M.
    (2012) The power of a smile to move you: Complementary submissiveness in women’s posture as a function of gender salience and facial expression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1480–1494. 10.1177/0146167212454178
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212454178 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dernberger, B. N. & Pepin, J. R.
    (2020) Gender flexibility, but not equality: Young adults’ division of labor preferences. Sociological Science, 71, 36–56. 10.15195/v7.a2
    https://doi.org/10.15195/v7.a2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W.
    (2013) The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 81, 340–357. 10.1177/1745691613484767
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613484767 [Google Scholar]
  8. Genesee, F.
    (1984) The social-psychological significance of bilingual code switching for children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 51, 3–20. 10.1017/S014271640000480X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640000480X [Google Scholar]
  9. Glikson, E., Cheshin, A., & Kleef, G. A. V.
    (2018) The dark side of a smiley: Effects of smiling emoticons on virtual first impressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(5), 614–625. 10.1177/1948550617720269
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617720269 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall, J. A. & Gunnery, S. D.
    (2013) Gender differences in nonverbal communication. InJ. A. Hall & M. L. Knapp (Eds.), Nonverbal communication (pp.639–669). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110238150.639
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238150.639 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall, J. A., Carter, J. D., & Horgan, T. G.
    (2000) Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion. InA. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp.97–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511628191.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.006 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hess, U., Adams Jr, R., & Kleck, R.
    (2005) Who may frown and who should smile? Dominance, affiliation, and the display of happiness and anger. Cognition and Emotion, 19(4), 515–536. 10.1080/02699930441000364
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000364 [Google Scholar]
  13. Huffaker, D. A. & Calvert, S. L.
    (2005) Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), JCMC10211. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2005.tb00238.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00238.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Hung, C. A., Wu, P. L., Liu, N. Y., Hsu, W. Y., Lee, B. O., & Pai, H. C.
    (2019) The effect of gender-friendliness barriers on perceived image in nursing and caring behaviour among male nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(9–10), 1465–1472. 10.1111/jocn.14693
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14693 [Google Scholar]
  15. Koenig, A. M. & Eagly, A. H.
    (2014) Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 371–392. 10.1037/a0037215
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037215 [Google Scholar]
  16. Luong, A.
    (2007) Gender and the underexpression of friendliness in the service context. Journal of Management & Organization, 13(2), 102–113. 10.5172/jmo.2007.13.2.102
    https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2007.13.2.102 [Google Scholar]
  17. Maíz-Arévalo, C.
    (2015) Typographic alteration in formal computer-mediated communication. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2121, 140–145. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.311
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.311 [Google Scholar]
  18. McDuff, D., Kodra, E., Kaliouby, R. E., & LaFrance, M.
    (2017) A large-scale analysis of sex differences in facial expressions. PloS One, 12(4), e0173942. 10.1371/journal.pone.0173942
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173942 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mehu, M. & Dunbar, R. I.
    (2008) Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behaviour, 1747–1780.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Radeke, M. K. & Stahelski, A. J.
    (2020) Altering age and gender stereotypes by creating the Halo and Horns Effects with facial expressions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–11. 10.1057/s41599‑020‑0504‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0504-6 [Google Scholar]
  21. Rubin, D. & Greene, K.
    (1992) Gender-typical style in written language. Research in the teaching of English, 261, 7–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Scarborough, W. J., Sin, R., & Risman, B.
    (2019) Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender and Society, 33(2), 173–200. 10.1177/0891243218809604
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218809604 [Google Scholar]
  23. Simpson, P. A. & Stroh, L. K.
    (2004) Gender differences: Emotional expression and feelings of personal inauthenticity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 715–721. 10.1037/0021‑9010.89.4.715
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.715 [Google Scholar]
  24. Skovholt, K., Grønning, A., & Kankaanranta, A.
    (2014) The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails::-. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 780–797. 10.1111/jcc4.12063
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12063 [Google Scholar]
  25. Tannen, D.
    (2012) The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words. New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D., & Uppal, S.
    (2010) Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 190–199. 10.1002/asi.21180
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21180 [Google Scholar]
  27. Vandergriff, I.
    (2013) Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 511, 1–12. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  28. Varghese, L., Lindeman, M. I. H., & Finkelstein, L.
    (2018) Dodging the double bind: The role of warmth and competence on the relationship between interview communication styles and perceptions of women’s hirability. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(4), 418–429. 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1463989
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1463989 [Google Scholar]
  29. Vogel, D. L., Wester, S. R., Heesacker, M., Boysen, G. A., & Seeman, J.
    (2006) Gender differences in emotional expression: Do mental health trainees overestimate the magnitude?. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(3), 305–332. 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.3.305
    https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.3.305 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wagner, H. L., Buck, R., & Winterbotham, M.
    (1993) Communication of specific emotions: Gender differences in sending accuracy and communication measures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17(1), 29–53. 10.1007/BF00987007
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987007 [Google Scholar]
  31. Waseleski, C.
    (2006) Gender and the use of exclamation points in computer-mediated communication: An analysis of exclamations posted to two electronic discussion lists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1012–1024. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2006.00305.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00305.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Wolf, A.
    (2000) Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 827–833. 10.1089/10949310050191809
    https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050191809 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/is.22054.nic
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/is.22054.nic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error