1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Interaction Studies
  4. Volume 25, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1572-0373
  • E-ISSN: 1572-0381
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

As children grow, they increasingly encounter situations requiring them to follow multiple steps to manipulate objects or perform actions. This study examines how caregivers adjust their instructional behavior when a child fails to correctly execute part of a multi-step procedure. Thirty-two mothers demonstrated to their 2–3-year-old children how to use a novel toy with three action sequences. A motion capture system measured the movements of each mother’s hand during demonstrations to assess whether mothers modulated their motions during each manipulation phase. Analyses revealed that mothers changed their demonstrations depending on their children’s imitation task performance. Specifically, mothers shortened their demonstrations for the parts that the children could perform and emphasized their movements for the parts that the children could not perform. This study reveal that, unlike in previous studies, infant-directed actions may contain strategies that are more understandable to children depending on the purpose of the action.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/is.24015.nag
2025-02-07
2026-09-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/is.24015.nag
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/is.24015.nag.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/is.24015.nag&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abravanel, E., & Gingold, H.
    (1985) Learning via observation during the second year of life. Developmental Psychology, 21(4), 614–623. 10.1037/0012‑1649.21.4.614
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.4.614 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barr, R., Dowden, A., & Hayne, H.
    (1996) Developmental changes in deferred imitation by 6- to 24-month-old infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 19(2), 159–170. 10.1016/S0163‑6383(96)90015‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90015-6 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brand, R. J., Baldwin, D. A., & Ashburn, L. A.
    (2002) Evidence for “motionese”: Modifications in mothers’ infant-directed action. Developmental Science, 5(1), 72–83. 10.1111/1467‑7687.00211
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00211 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brand, R. J., & Shallcross, W. L.
    (2008) Infants prefer motionese to adult-directed action. Developmental Science, 11(6), 853–861. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00734.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00734.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Brand, R. J., Shallcross, W. L., Sabatos, M. G., & Massie, K. P.
    (2007) Fine-grained analysis of motionese: Eye gaze, object exchanges, and action units in infant-versus adult-directed action. Infancy, 11(2), 203–214. 10.1111/j.1532‑7078.2007.tb00223.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00223.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruner, J. S.
    (1972) Nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27(8), 687–708. 10.1037/h0033144
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033144 [Google Scholar]
  7. Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M.
    (1998) Fourteen- to 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 211, 315–330. 10.1016/S0163‑6383(98)90009‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90009-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Csibra, G.
    (2010) Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind & Language, 25(2), 141–168. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2009.01384.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01384.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Csibra, G., & Gergely, G.
    (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A.
    (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 [Google Scholar]
  11. Flinn, M. V., & Ward, C. V.
    (2005) Ontogeny and evolution of the social child. InB. J. Ellis & D. F. Bjorkland (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp.19–44). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fukuyama, H., Qin, S. B., Kanakogi, Y., Nagai, Y., Asada, M., & Myowa-Yamakoshi, M.
    (2015) Infant’s action skill dynamically modulates parental action demonstration in the dyadic interaction. Developmental Science, 18(6), 1006–1013. 10.1111/desc.12270
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12270 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hesse, C., & Deubel, H.
    (2010) Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 508–516. 10.1152/jn.00097.2010
     https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00097.2010 [Google Scholar]
  14. Horner, V., & Whiten, A.
    (2005) Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8(3), 164–181. 10.1007/s10071‑004‑0239‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Keen, R.
    (2011) The development of problem solving in young children: A critical cognitive skill. Annual Review of Psychology, 621, 1–21. 10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130730
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130730 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kenward, B., Karlsson, M., & Persson, J.
    (2011) Over-imitation is better explained by norm learning than by distorted causal learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2781, 1239–1246. 10.1098/rspb.2010.1399
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1399 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiraly, I., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G.
    (2013) Beyond rational imitation: Learning arbitrary means actions from communicative demonstrations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1161, 471–486. 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kosie, J. E., & Lew-Williams, C.
    (2024) Infant-directed communication: Examining the many dimensions of everyday caregiver-infant interactions. Developmental Science, e13515. 10.1111/desc.13515
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13515 [Google Scholar]
  19. Koterba, E. A., & Iverson, J. M.
    (2009) Investigating motionese: The effect of infant-directed action on infants’ attention and object exploration. Infant Behavior and Development, 32(4), 437–444. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Leung, A., Tunkel, A., & Yurovsky, D.
    (2021) Parents fine-tune their speech to children’s vocabulary knowledge. Psychological Science, 32(7), 975–984. 10.1177/0956797621993104
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621993104 [Google Scholar]
  21. Loucks, J., & Nagel, N.
    (2018) Temporal perception is enhanced for goal-directed biological actions. Visual Cognition, 26(7), 530–544. 10.1080/13506285.2018.1516708
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2018.1516708 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G., & Keil, F. C.
    (2007) The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 1041, 19751–19756. 10.1073/pnas.0704452104
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704452104 [Google Scholar]
  23. McEllin, L., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G.
    (2018) Identifying others’ informative intentions from movement kinematics. Cognition, 1801, 246–258. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Meltzoff, A. N.
    (1993) The centrality of motor coordination and proprioception in social and cognitive development: From shared actions to shared mind. InG. J. P. Savelsbergh (Ed.), The development of coordination in infancy (pp.463–496). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Free University Press. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(08)60964‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60964-4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Meyer, M., Schaik, J. E., Poli, F., & Hunnius, S.
    (2022) How infant-directed actions enhance infants’ attention, learning, and exploration: evidence from EEG and computational modeling. Developmental Science, e13259. 10.1111/desc.13259
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13259 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagell, K., Olguin, R. S., & Tomasello, M.
    (1993) Processes of social-learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (pan-troglodytes) and human children (homo-sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107(2), 174–186. 10.1037/0735‑7036.107.2.174
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.107.2.174 [Google Scholar]
  27. Oldfield, R. C.
    (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 91, 97–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.101. 10.1016/0028‑3932(71)90067‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Piaget, J.
    (1962) Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Piazza, E. A., Iordan, M. C., & Lew-Williams, C.
    (2017) Mothers consistently alter their unique vocal fingerprints when Communicating with Infants. Current Biology, 27(20), 3162–3167. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.074
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.074 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rohlfing, K. J., Fritsch, J., Wrede, B., & Jungmann, T.
    (2006) How can multimodal cues from child-directed interaction reduce learning complexity in robots?Advanced Robotics, 20(10), 1183–1199. 10.1163/156855306778522532
     https://doi.org/10.1163/156855306778522532 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rohlfing, K. J., Vollmer, A.-L., Fritsch, J., & Wrede, B.
    (2022) Which “motionese” parameters change with children’s age? Disentangling attention-getting from action-structuring modifications. Frontiers in Communication, 71, 922405. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.922405
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.922405 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenberg, K. R.
    (2021) The evolution of human infancy: why it helps to be helpless. Annual Review of Anthropology, 501, 423–440. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑111819‑105454
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-111819-105454 [Google Scholar]
  33. Rutherford, M. D., & Przednowek, M.
    (2012) Fathers show modifications of infant-directed action similar to that of mothers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(3), 367–378. 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schreiner, M. S., van Schaik, J. E., Sucević, J., Hunnius, S., & Meyer, M.
    (2020) Let’s talk action: Infant-directed speech facilitates infants’ action learning. Developmental Psychology, 56(9), 1623. 10.1037/dev0001079
     https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001079 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G.
    (2021) Progress in joint-action research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 301, 138–143. 10.1177/0963721420984425
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420984425 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tomasello, M.
    (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. (2016) Cultural learning redux. Child Development87(3):643–53. 10.1111/cdev.12499
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12499 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H.
    (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691. 10.1017/S0140525X05000129
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129 [Google Scholar]
  39. van Schaik, J. E., Meyer, M., van Ham, C. R., & Hunnius, S.
    (2020) Motion tracking of parents’ infant-versus adult-directed actions reveals general and action-specific modulations. Developmental Science, 23(1), e12869. 10.1111/desc.12869
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12869 [Google Scholar]
  40. Whiten, A., Custance, D. M., Gomez, J. C., Teixidor, P., & Bard, K. A.
    (1996) Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110(1), 3–14. 10.1037/0735‑7036.110.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Williamson, R. A., & Brand, R. J.
    (2014) Child-directed action promotes 2-year-olds’ imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1181, 119–126. 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G.
    (1976) Role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.1976.tb00381.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/is.24015.nag
Loading
Mothers adjust their demonstrations based on children’s imitation task performance
Interaction Studies 25, 125 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/is.24015.nag
/content/journals/10.1075/is.24015.nag
/content/journals/10.1075/is.24015.nag
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): feedback; instruction; mother–child interaction; motion tracking

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error