Motor interference of elbow configuration changes in human-robot interaction

References

1. Badets, A., Blandin, Y., and Shea, C. S.
   (2006) Intention in motor learning through observation. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 (2), pp.377–86. 10.1080/02724980443000773
   https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000773 [Google Scholar]
2. Bortot, D., Born, M. and Bengler
   (2013) Directly or on detours? How should industrial robots approximate humans?, In: Proc. of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cao, S. H., Han, X. Y., Zhao, Z. P.
   (2025) Hand position fields of neurons in the premotor cortex of macaques during natural reaching. Nat Commun16, 3489. 10.1038/s41467‑025‑58786‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58786-3 [Google Scholar]
4. Chaminade, T., Franklin, D., Oztop, E., and Cheng, G.
   (2005): Motor interference between humans and humanoid robots: Effect of biological and artificial motion. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL). 10.1109/DEVLRN.2005.1490951
   https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2005.1490951 [Google Scholar]
5. Chinellato, E., Castiello, U. and Sartori, L.
   (2015) Motor interference in interactive contexts. Front. Psychol. 61:791. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00791
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00791 [Google Scholar]
6. Coudé, G., Toschi, G., Festante, F., Bimbi, M., Bonaiuto, J.
   (2019) Grasping Neurons in the Ventral Premotor Cortex of Macaques Are Modulated by Social Goals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31 (2), pp.299–313. 10.1162/jocn_a_01353
   https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01353 [Google Scholar]
7. Flash, T., and Hogan, N.
   (1985): The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, Vol.5, No.7, pp.1688–1703, Society for Neuroscience. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05‑07‑01688.1985
   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-07-01688.1985 [Google Scholar]
8. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., and Rizzolatti, G.
   (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cprtex, Brain1191: 593–609.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kaya, M. and Kühnlenz, K.
   (2023) “Towards Prediction of Motor Interference during synchronous Human-Robot Arm Movements Using Subjective Ratings of Anthropomorphism,” Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 10.1109/RO‑MAN57019.2023.10309618
   https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309618 [Google Scholar]
10. Kaya, M., Bauer, J., Nickl, F., and Kühnlenz, K.
    (2025) Towards Motor Interference of Limb Configuration Changes — a potential Measure for Human-likeness of Robots. Proc. of the 27th Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII), accepted. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑93429‑2_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93429-2_9 [Google Scholar]
11. Kilner, J., Paulignan, Y., and Blakemore, S.
    (2003): An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, Vol.13, No.6, pp.522–525. 10.1016/S0960‑9822(03)00165‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9 [Google Scholar]
12. Kilner, J., Hamilton, A., and Blakemore, S.
    (2007): Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion. Social Neuroscience, 2(3), pp.158–166. 10.1080/17470910701428190
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910701428190 [Google Scholar]
13. Kühnlenz, K. and Kühnlenz, B.
    (2020) Motor interference of incongruent motions increases workload in close HRI, Advanced Robotics, 34:6, pp.400–406, Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kupferberg, A., Glasauer, S., Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., and Brandt, T.
    (2011): Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction. In: AI & Society, 26(4):339–345. 10.1007/s00146‑010‑0314‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0314-2 [Google Scholar]
15. Kuz, S., Petruck, H., Heisterueber, M. A., Patel, H., Schumann, B., Schlick, C., Mirror Neurons
    (2015) and Human-Robot Interaction in Assembly Cells, Proc. of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kuz, S., Mertens, A. and Schlick, M.
    (2018) Anthropomorphic motion control of a gantry robot in assembly cells, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19:6, pp.738–751, Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lago, A., Cheeran, B., Koch, G., Hortobagyi, T., and Fernández-Del-Olmo, M.
    (2014) The role of mirror neurons in observational motor learning: an integrative review. European Journal of Human Movement. 321. 82–103.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Oztop, E., Franklin, D., Chaminade, T., and Cheng, G.
    (2005): Human-humanoid interaction: Is a humanoid robot perceived as a human?In: International Journal of Humanoid Robots, Vol.21, pp.537–559. 10.1142/S0219843605000582
    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843605000582 [Google Scholar]
19. Petruck, H., Kuz, S., Mertens, A., and Schlick, C.
    (2016) Increasing Safety in Human-Robot Collaboration by Using Anthropomorphic Speed Profiles of Robot Movements, In: Schlick, C., Trzcieliński, S. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol4901. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑41697‑7_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41697-7_13 [Google Scholar]
20. Rinkenauer, G., Böckenkamp, A., and Weigert, F.
    (2017) Man-Robot Collaboration in the Context of Industry 4.0: Approach-Avoidance Tendencies as an Indicator for the Affective Quality of Interaction?, In: Schlick, C. (eds) Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑53305‑5_24
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53305-5_24 [Google Scholar]
21. Rudisch, J., Holzhauer, L., Kravanja, K., Hamker, F. and Voelcker-Rehage, C.
    (2024) A systematic review of observational practice for adaptation of reaching movements. npj Science of Learning. 91. 10.1038/s41539‑024‑00271‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00271-5 [Google Scholar]
22. Zhao, M., Li, R., Xiang, S., and Liu, N.
    (2024) Two different mirror neuron pathways for social and non-social actions? A meta-analysis of fMRI studies, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Volume19, Issue1. 10.1093/scan/nsae068
    https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsae068 [Google Scholar]