Volume 169, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The field of vocabulary research is witnessing a growing interest in the use of eye-tracking to investigate topics that have traditionally been examined using offline measures, providing new insights into the processing and learning of vocabulary. During an eye-tracking experiment, participants’ eye movements are recorded while they attend to written or auditory input, resulting in a rich record of online processing behaviour. Because of its many benefits, eye-tracking is becoming a major research technique in vocabulary research. However, before this emerging trend of eye-tracking based vocabulary research continues to proliferate, it is important to step back and reflect on what current studies have shown about the processing and learning of vocabulary, and the ways in which we can use the technique in future research. To this aim, the present paper provides a comprehensive overview of current eye-tracking research findings, both in terms of the processing and learning of single words and formulaic sequences. Current research gaps and potential avenues for future research are also discussed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Balota, D. , Pollatsek, A. , & Rayner, K.
    (1985) The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(85)90013‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bisson, M. -J. , Van Heuven, W. , Conklin, K. , & Tunney, R.
    (2015) The role of verbal and pictorial information in multi-modal incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(7), 1306–1326. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.979211
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.979211 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carpenter, P. , & Just, M.
    (1983) What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp.275–307). New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑583680‑7.50022‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-583680-7.50022-9 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carreiras, M. , Perea, M. , & Grainger, J.
    (1997) Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 857–871.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carrol, G. , & Conklin, K.
    (2015) Cross language priming extends to formulaic units: Evidence from eye tracking suggests that this idea “has legs”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 299–317.10.1017/S1366728915000103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000103 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carrol, G. , Conklin, K. , & Gyllstad, H.
    (2016) Found in translation: The influence of L1 on the processing of idioms in L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 403–443.10.1017/S0272263115000492
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000492 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaffin, R. , Morris, R. K. , & Seely, R. E.
    (2001) Learning new word meanings from context: A study of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 225–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi, S.
    (2017) Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye-movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 403–426.10.1177/1362168816653271
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816653271 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cieslicka, A.
    (2006) Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second Language Research, 22, 115–144. doi: 10.1191/0267658306sr263oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr263oa [Google Scholar]
  10. Coltheart, M. , Davelaar, E. , Jonasson, J. T. , & Besner, D.
    (1977) Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performanceVI (pp.535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Conklin, K. , & Pellicer-Sánchez, A.
    (2016) Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32(3), 453–467.10.1177/0267658316637401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316637401 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cop, U. , Dirix, N. , Drieghe, D. , & Duyck, W.
    (2017) Presenting GECO: An eye-tracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 602–615.10.3758/s13428‑016‑0734‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0 [Google Scholar]
  13. Desmet, T. , & Duyck, W.
    (2007) Bilingual language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(3), 168–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00008.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00008.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Dirix, N. , Cop, U. , Drieghe, D. , Duyck, W. , & Hartsuiker, R. J.
    (2017) Cross-lingual neighborhood effects in generalized lexical decision and natural reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 43(6), 887–915.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Duyck, W. , Van Assche, E. , Drighe, D. , & Hartsuiker, R.
    (2007) Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 663–679.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elgort, I. , Brysbaert, M. , Stevens, M. , & Van Assche, E.
    (2017) Contextual word learning during reading in a second language: An eye movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–26. doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000109 [Google Scholar]
  17. Godfroid, A. , Boers, F. , & Housen, A.
    (2013) An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000119
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000119 [Google Scholar]
  18. Grainger, J. , O’regan, J. K. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Segui, J.
    (1989) On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45(3), 189–195. doi: 10.3758/BF03210696
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210696 [Google Scholar]
  19. Inhoff, A. W. , & Rayner, K.
    (1986) Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 431–439. doi: 10.3758/BF03208203
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208203 [Google Scholar]
  20. Joseph, H. S. S. L. , Wonnacott, E. , Forber, P. , & Nation, K.
    (2014) Becoming a written word: Eye movements reveal order of acquisition effects following incidental exposure to new words during silent reading. Cognition, 133, 238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.015 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kliegl, R. , Grabner, E. , Rolfs, M. , & Engbert, R.
    (2004) Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262–284. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000213
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000213 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemhöfer, K. , Dijkstra, T. , & Michel, M. C.
    (2004) Three languages, one echo: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 585–611. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000007
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000007 [Google Scholar]
  23. Libben, M. R. , & Titone, D. A.
    (2009) Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 381–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lowell, R. , & Morris, R. K.
    (2014) Word length effects on novel words: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76, 179–189. doi: 10.3758/s13414‑013‑0556‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0556-4 [Google Scholar]
  25. McConkie, G. , & Rayner, K.
    (1975) The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 578–586. doi: 10.3758/BF03203972
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203972 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohamed, A. A.
    (2015) The roles of context and repetition in incidental vocabulary acquisition from L2 reading: An eye movement study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2017) Exposure frequency in L2 reading. An eye-movement perspective of incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Online first view, doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000092 [Google Scholar]
  28. Molinaro, N. , Canal, P. , Vespignani, F. , Pesciarelli, F. , & Cacciari, C.
    (2013) Are complex function words processed as semantically empty strings? A reading time and ERP study of collocational complex Prepositions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(6), 762–788. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.665465
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.665465 [Google Scholar]
  29. Montero Perez, M. , Peters, E. , & Desmet, P.
    (2015) Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned video: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 308–328. doi: 10.1111/modl.12215
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12215 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pellicer-Sánchez, A.
    (2016) Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.10.1017/S0272263115000224
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000224 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pellicer-Sánchez, A. , & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
    An eye-tracking investigation of incidental collocation learning during reading. Paper presented atthe Annual conference of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, 8–12 April 2016, Orlando, Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Perea, M. , & Pollatsek, A.
    (1998) The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 767–779.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pollatsek, A. , Perea, M. , & Binder, K.
    (1999) The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1142–1158.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Radach, R. , & Kennedy, A.
    (2004) Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for the future. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3–26. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000295
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000295 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rayner, K.
    (2009) The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rayner, K. , & Bertera, J. H.
    (1979) Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468–69. doi: 10.1126/science.504987
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.504987 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rayner, K. , & Duffy, S.
    (1986) Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14, 191–201. doi: 10.3758/BF03197692
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rayner, K. , & Well, A.
    (1996) Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 504–509. doi: 10.3758/BF03214555
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214555 [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberts, L. , & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
    (2013) Using eye-tracking to investigate topics in L2 acquisition and L2 sentence and discourse processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 213–235. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000861
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000861 [Google Scholar]
  40. Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
    (2013) Eye-tracking and ERPs in multi-word expression research: A state-of-the-art review of the method and findings. The Mental Lexicon, 8(2), 245–268. doi: 10.1075/ml.8.2.06siy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.2.06siy [Google Scholar]
  41. Siyanova-Chanturia, A. , Conklin, K. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2011a) Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and nonnative speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251–272. doi: 10.1177/0267658310382068
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310382068 [Google Scholar]
  42. Siyanova-Chanturia, A. , Conklin, K. , & van Heuven, W.
    (2011b) Seeing a phrase ‘time and again’ matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multi-word sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition, 37, 776–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Titone, D. , Libben, M. , Mercier, J. , Whitford, V. , & Pivneva, I.
    (2011) Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1-L2intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1412–1431.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Underwood, G. , Schmitt, N. , & Galpin, A.
    (2004) The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp.153–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.9.09und
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.09und [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Assche, E. , Drieghe, D. , Duyck, W. , Welvaert, M. , & Hartsuiker, R. J.
    (2011) The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 88–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Assche, E. , Duyck, W. , Hartsuiker, R. J. , & Diependaele, K.
    (2009) Does bilingualism change native-language reading?Psychological Science, 20, 923–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02389.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Heuven, W. J. B. , Dijkstra, T. , & Grainger, J.
    (1998) Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2584
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2584 [Google Scholar]
  48. Vilkaite, L.
    (2016) Are nonadjacent collocations processed faster?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42(10), 1632–1642.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Vilkaite, L. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2017) Reading collocations in an L2: Do collocation processing benefits extend to non-adjacent collocations?Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1093/applin/amx030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx030 [Google Scholar]
  50. Von Studnitz, R. E. , & Green, D. W.
    (2002) The cost of switching language in a semantic categorization task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 241–251. doi: 10.1017/S1366728902003036
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003036 [Google Scholar]
  51. Whitford, V. , & Titone, D.
    (2012) Second language experience modulates first- and second- language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 73–80. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑011‑0179‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0179-5 [Google Scholar]
  52. Whitford, V. , Pivneva, I. & Titone, D.
    (2016) Eye movement methods to investigate bilingual reading. In R. R. Heredia , J. Altarriba & A. B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp.183–211). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4939‑2993‑1_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2993-1_8 [Google Scholar]
  53. William, R. S. , & Morris, R. K.
    (2004) Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 312–339. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000196
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000196 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wolter, B. , & Gyllstad, H.
    (2011) Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32, 430–449. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr011 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wolter, B. , & Yamashita, J.
    (2015) Processing collocations in a second language: a case of first language activation?Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1193–1221. doi: 10.1017/S0142716414000113
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000113 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): eye movements; formulaic language; lexical processing; vocabulary; vocabulary learning.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error