1887
Volume 169, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study aims to develop two equivalent forms of the Guessing from Context Test (GCT) and provide its preliminary validity evidence. The GCT is a diagnostic test of the guessing skill and measures the following three important steps in guessing: identifying the part of speech of an unknown word, finding its discourse clue, and deriving its meaning. The test was administered to 428 Japanese learners of English. The results indicate that the two forms each with 20 question sets are equivalent in terms of item difficulty distribution and representativeness of the construct being measured. A wide range of validity evidence was provided using Messick’s validation framework, the Rasch model, qualitative investigations into the relationships to actual guessing, and proposals for score interpretation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.00009.sas
2018-04-16
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ames, W. S.
    (1966) The development of a classification scheme of contextual aids. Reading Research Quarterly, 2(1), 57–82. doi: 10.2307/747039
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747039 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrich, D.
    (1988) Rasch models for measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412985598
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985598 [Google Scholar]
  3. Artley, A. S.
    (1943) Teaching word-meaning through context. Elementary English Review, 20(1), 68–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck, I. L. , McKeown, M. G. , & McCaslin, E. S.
    (1983) Vocabulary development: All contexts are not created equal. Elementary School Journal, 83(3), 177–181. doi: 10.1086/461307
    https://doi.org/10.1086/461307 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bensoussan, M. , & Laufer, B.
    (1984) Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7(1), 15–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.1984.tb00252.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1984.tb00252.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bond, T. G. , & Fox, C. M.
    (2015) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, R. , Waring, R. , & Donkaewbua, S.
    (2008) Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, W.
    (1910) Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruton, A. , & Samuda, V.
    (1981) Guessing words. Modern English Teacher, 8(3), 18–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carnine, D. , Kameenui, E. J. , & Coyle, G.
    (1984) Utilization of contextual information in determining the meaning of unfamiliar words. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), 188–204. doi: 10.2307/747362
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747362 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carpay, J. A. M.
    (1974) Foreign-language teaching and meaningful learning: A Soviet Russian point of view. ITL, 25–26, 161–187.10.1075/itl.25‑26.10car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.25-26.10car [Google Scholar]
  12. Clarke, D. F. , & Nation, I. S. P.
    (1980) Guessing the meanings of words from context: Strategy and techniques. System, 8(3), 211–220. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(80)90003‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(80)90003-2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.112.1.155
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cooper, T. C.
    (1999) Processing of idioms by L2 learners of English. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 233–262. doi: 10.2307/3587719
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587719 [Google Scholar]
  16. de Bot, K. , Paribakht, T. S. , & Wesche, M.
    (1997) Towards a lexical processing model for the study of second language vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from ESL reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(3), 309–329. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197003021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197003021 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deighton, L. C.
    (1959) Vocabulary development in the classroom. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dulin, K. L.
    (1970) Using context clues in word recognition and comprehension. Reading Teacher, 23(5), 440–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, R.
    (1994) Factors in the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary from oral input: A review essay. Applied Language Learning, 5(1), 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fraser, C. A.
    (1999) Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 225–241. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199002041
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002041 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fukkink, R. G. , & de Glopper, K.
    (1998) Effects of instruction in deriving word meaning from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 450–469. doi: 10.3102/00346543068004450
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068004450 [Google Scholar]
  22. Haastrup, K.
    (1985) Lexical inferencing – a study of procedures in reception. Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism, 5, 63–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1987) Using thinking aloud and retrospection to uncover learners’ lexical inferencing procedures. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp.197–212). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1991) Lexical inferencing procedures or talking about words. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Haynes, M.
    (1993) Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In T. Huckin , M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second Language Reading and Vocabulary (pp.46–64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Horst, M. , Cobb, T. , & Meara, P.
    (1998) Beyond a Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hu, M. , & Nation, I. S. P.
    (2000) Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson, D. , & Pearson, P. D.
    (1984) Teaching reading vocabulary. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuhn, M. R. , & Stahl, S. A.
    (1998) Teaching children to learn word meanings from context. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(1), 119–138. doi: 10.1080/10862969809547983
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969809547983 [Google Scholar]
  30. Laufer, B.
    (1997) The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.20–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Laufer, B. , & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C.
    (2010) Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Laufer, B. , & Sim, D. D.
    (1985) Taking the easy way out: Non-use and misuse of clues in EFL reading. English Teaching Forum, 23(2), 7–10, 20.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Leech, G. , Rayson, P. , & Wilson, A.
    (2001) Word frequencies in written and spoken English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Linacre, J. M.
    (1995) Prioritizing misfit indicators. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9(2), 422–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2016a) WINSTEPS® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
  36. (2016b) WINSTEPS® Rasch measurement computer programs User’s Guide. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Linacre, J. M. , & Tennant, A.
    (2009) More about critical eigenvalue sizes (variences) in standardized-residual principal components analysis (PCA). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 23(3), 1228.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McCullough, C. M.
    (1943) Learning to use context clues. Elementary English Review, 20, 140–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (1945) The recognition of context clues in reading. Elementary English Review, 22(1), 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Meng, X. -L. , Rosenthal, R. , & Rubin, D. B.
    (1992) Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.111.1.172
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172 [Google Scholar]
  41. Messick, S.
    (1989) Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp.13–103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1995) Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.50.9.741
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741 [Google Scholar]
  43. Morrison, L.
    (1996) Talking about words: A study of French as a second language learners’ lexical inferencing procedures. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 41–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nagy, W. E. , Anderson, R. C. , & Herman, P. A.
    (1987) Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 237–270. doi: 10.3102/00028312024002237
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312024002237 [Google Scholar]
  45. Nagy, W. E. , Herman, P. , & Anderson, R. C.
    (1985) Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233–253. doi: 10.2307/747758
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747758 [Google Scholar]
  46. Nassaji, H.
    (2003) L2 vocabulary learning from context: strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645–670. doi: 10.2307/3588216
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588216 [Google Scholar]
  47. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nation, I. S. P. , & Coady, J.
    (1988) Vocabulary and reading. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.97–110). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Paribakht, T. S. , & Wesche, M.
    (1999) Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195–224. doi: 10.1017/S027226319900203X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319900203X [Google Scholar]
  50. Parry, K.
    (1991) Building a vocabulary through academic reading. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 629–653. doi: 10.2307/3587080
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587080 [Google Scholar]
  51. Raîche, G.
    (2005) Critical eigenvalue sizes in standardized residual principal components analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19(1), 1012.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rasch, G.
    (1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sasao, Y. , & Webb, S.
    (2017) The Word Part Levels Test. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 12–30.10.1177/1362168815586083
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815586083 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schatz, E. K. , & Baldwin, R. S.
    (1986) Context clues are unreliable predictors of word meaning. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 439–453. doi: 10.2307/747615
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747615 [Google Scholar]
  55. Schouten-van Parreren, C.
    (1996) Vocabulary learning and metacognition. In K. Sajavaara & C. Fairweather (Eds.), Approaches to second language acquisition (pp.63–69). Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Seibert, L. C.
    (1945) A study on the practice of guessing word meanings from a context. Modern Language Journal, 29(4), 296–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1945.tb00276.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1945.tb00276.x [Google Scholar]
  57. Smith Jr., E. V.
    (2004) Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: a Rasch measurement perspective. In E. V. Smith Jr. & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and applications (pp.93–122). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. (2005) Effect of item redundancy on Rasch item and person estimates. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 147–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Spache, G. , & Berg, P.
    (1955) The art of efficient reading. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Spearman, C.
    (1910) Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3(3), 271–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Stevens, J.
    (2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Strang, R. M.
    (1944) How students attack unfamiliar words. The English Journal, 33(2), 88–93. doi: 10.2307/806504
    https://doi.org/10.2307/806504 [Google Scholar]
  63. van Parreren, C. F.
    (1975) First and second-language learning compared. In A. J. van Essen & J. P. Menting (Eds.), The context of foreign-language learning (pp.100–116). Assen: Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Walters, J.
    (2006) Methods of teaching inferring meaning from context. RELC Journal, 37(2), 176–190. doi: 10.1177/0033688206067427
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206067427 [Google Scholar]
  65. Waring, R. , & Takaki, M.
    (2003) At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader?Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(2), 130–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Williams, R.
    (1985) Teaching vocabulary recognition strategies in ESP reading. ESP Journal, 4(2), 121–131. doi: 10.1016/0272‑2380(85)90015‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-2380(85)90015-0 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wolfe, E. W. , & Smith Jr., E. V.
    (2007) Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part 2 – Validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 204–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wright, B. D. , & Stone, M. H.
    (1979) Best test design. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.00009.sas
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.00009.sas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): diagnostic test , equivalent forms , guessing from context , validation. and vocabulary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error