Volume 169, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Previous comparisons of vocabulary uptake from captioned and uncaptioned audio-visual materials have almost consistently furnished evidence in favour of captioned materials. However, it is possible that many such comparative studies gave an advantage to the captioned input conditions by virtue of their use of written word prompts in the tests. The present study therefore examines whether aurally presented test prompts yield equally compelling evidence for the superiority of captioned over uncaptioned video. Intermediate EFL learners watched a ten-minute TED Talks video either with or without captions and were subsequently given a word recognition and a word meaning test, with half of the test prompts presented in print and the other half presented aurally. While the results of the word recognition test were inconclusive, the word meaning test yielded significantly better scores by the group that watched the captioned video. However, this was due entirely to their superior scores on the printed word prompts, not the aural ones. This suggests that evaluations of the benefits of captions for vocabulary acquisitions should take input-modality – test-modality congruency into account.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baltova, I.
    (1994) The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 507–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barcroft, J.
    (2015) Lexical input processing and vocabulary learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.43
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.43 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bisson, M. -J. , Van Heuven, W. J. B. , Conklin, K. , & Tunney, R.
    (2014) Processing of native and foreign language subtitles in films: An eye tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 693–713.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Borras, I. , & Lafayette, R. C.
    (1994) Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 61–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02015.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02015.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, R. , Waring, R. , & Donkaewbua, S.
    (2008) Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chai, J. , & Erlam, R.
    (2008) The effect and the influence of the use of video and captions on second language learning. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14, 25–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, A. -C. , & Read, J.
    (2013) Investigating the effects of multiple-choice listening test items in the oral versus written mode on L2 listeners’ performance and perceptions. System, 41, 575–586. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coxhead, A. J. , & Walls, R.
    (2012) TED Talks, vocabulary, and listening for EAP. The TESOLANZ Journal, 20, 55–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Freeborn, D.
    (2006) From Old English to Standard English (3rd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1007/978‑0‑230‑20768‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20768-4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goh, C. C.
    (2000) A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. doi: 10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00060‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Horst, M. , Cobb, T. , & Meara, P.
    (1998) Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hulstijn, J.
    (2001) Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automacity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp.258–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011 [Google Scholar]
  13. King, J.
    (2002) Using DVD feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 509–523. doi: 10.1076/call.15.5.509.13468
    https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.5.509.13468 [Google Scholar]
  14. Laufer, B.
    (1997) What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy? Intralexical factors affecting the difficulty of vocabulary acquisition. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Vocabulary description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp.140–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2003) Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567 [Google Scholar]
  16. Markham, P.
    (1999) Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 321–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1999.tb01344.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb01344.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Montero Perez, M. , Van Den Noortgate, W. , & Desmet, P.
    (2013) Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System, 41, 720–739. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Montero Perez, M. , Peters, E. , Clarebout, G. , & Desmet, P.
    (2014) Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 118–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Montero Perez, M. , Peters, E. , & Desmet, P.
    (2015) Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned video: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 308–328. doi: 10.1111/modl.12215
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12215 [Google Scholar]
  20. Morris, C. D. , Bransford, J. D. , & Franks, J. J.
    (1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(77)80016‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. Nation, I. S. P. , & Heatley, A.
    (2002) Range: A Program for the Analysis of Vocabulary in Texts. Retrieved from www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Neuman, B. , & Koshinen, P.
    (1992) Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 96–106. doi: 10.2307/747835
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747835 [Google Scholar]
  23. Peters, E. , Heynen, E. , & Puimege, E.
    (2016) Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134–148.10.1016/j.system.2016.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pigada, M. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2006) Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodgers, M.
    (2013) English language learning through viewing television: An investigation of comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, lexical coverage, attitudes, and captions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rodgers, M. P. H. , & Webb, S.
    (2011) Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 689–717. doi: 10.5054/tq.2011.268062
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.268062 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2017) The effects of captions of EFL learners’ comprehension of English-language television programs. Calico Journal, 34, 20–38.10.1558/cj.29522
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.29522 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rost, M.
    (2002) Teaching and researching listening. London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmitt, N. , Schmitt, D. , & Clapman, C.
    (2001) Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.10.1177/026553220101800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103 [Google Scholar]
  30. Scotto di Carlo, G.
    (2014) The role of proximity in online popularizations: The case of TED talks, Discourse Studies, 16, 591–606. doi: 10.1177/1461445614538565
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614538565 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sweller, J.
    (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312. doi: 10.1016/0959‑4752(94)90003‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sydorenko, T.
    (2010) Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 50–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Takaesu, A.
    (2013) TED Talks as an extensive listening resource for EAP students. Language Education in Asia, 4, 150–162. doi: 10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I2/A05/Takaesu
    https://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I2/A05/Takaesu [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor, G.
    (2005) Perceived processing strategies of students watching captioned video. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 422–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2005.tb02228.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02228.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Tulving, E.
    (1993) What is episodic memory?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67–70. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8721.ep10770899
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770899 [Google Scholar]
  36. van Zeeland, H.
    (2013) Vocabulary and listening. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1430
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1430 [Google Scholar]
  37. van Zeeland, H. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2012) Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension?Applied Linguistics, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2013) Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41, 609–624. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vandergrift, L.
    (2007) Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004338
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338 [Google Scholar]
  40. Vanderplank, R.
    (2010) Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language teaching, 43, 1–37. doi: 10.1017/S0261444809990267
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990267 [Google Scholar]
  41. Vidal, K.
    (2003) Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition?Applied Linguistics, 24, 56–89. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.1.56
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.56 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2011) A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61, 219–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00593.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Waring, R. , & Takaki, M.
    (2003) At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader?Reading a Foreign Language, 15, 130–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Webb, S.
    (2008) The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 232–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2014a) Repetition in Incidental Vocabulary Learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1425
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1425 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2015) Extensive viewing: Language learning through watching television. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp.159–168). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Webb, S. , & Rodgers, M. P. H.
    (2009) Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59, 335–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00509.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Webb, S. , Sasao, Y. , & Ballance, O.
    (2017) The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 34–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Winke, P. , Gass, S. , & Sydorenko, T.
    (2010) The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 65–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2013) Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 254–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.01432.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01432.x [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): audio-visual input; captions; TED Talks; test modality; vocabulary acquisition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error