1887
image of Graded resources for learning and teaching foreign languages
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Innovative resources for teaching vocabulary have emerged during the last decades, among which the so-called ‘graded resources’, i.e. lexicons or inventories where linguistic forms have been associated with a difficulty level, having in mind a target reader. The idea of ‘grading’ in Education is not new and has evolved over time: vocabulary or text scales (grades) have been approached as an educational tool with the means available at each period of time. In this survey, our aim is to show how current approaches of graded resources for foreign language learning are rooted in the tradition of building frequency lists for education. We then synthesize the body of work that has been undertaken to design graduated resources, highlighting the different methodologies applied as well as existing resources.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.00024.fra
2024-09-13
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson, J. C.
    (2007) The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00627_4.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_4.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfter, D., Bizzoni, Y., Agebjörn, A., Volodina, E., & Pilán, I.
    (2016) From distributions to labels: A lexical proficiency analysis using learner corpora. InProceedings of the joint workshop on NLP for Computer Assisted Language Learning and NLP for Language Acquisition, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfter, D., & Volodina, E.
    (2018) Towards single word lexical complexity prediction. InProceedings of the thirteenth workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications, –. 10.18653/v1/W18‑0508
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-0508 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L.
    (1996) The CELEX lexical database (cd-rom).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beacco, J.-C., Lepage, S., Porquier, R., and Riba, P.
    (2008) Niveau A2 pour le français : Un référentiel. Didier.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Billami, M. B., François, T., & Gala, N.
    (2018) ReSyf: a French lexicon with ranked synonyms. InProceedings of COLING 2018, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D.
    (2015) Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the New General Service List. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt018 [Google Scholar]
  8. Browne, C.
    (2013) The New General Service List: celebrating 60 years of vocabulary learning. The Language Teacher, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brysbaert, M., Lange, M., & Wijnendaele, I. V.
    (2000) The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/095414400382208
    https://doi.org/10.1080/095414400382208 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brysbaert, M. & New, B.
    (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., & Mandera, P.
    (2021) Which words do English non-native speakers know? New supranational levels based on yes/no decision. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658320934526
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320934526 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carroll, J. B.
    (1972) A New Word Frequency Book. Elementary English, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B.
    (1971) The American Heritage Word Frequency Book. Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Capel, A.
    (2010) A1–B2 vocabulary: Insights and issues arising from the English Profile Wordlists project. English Profile Journal, ():–. 10.1017/S2041536210000048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S2041536210000048 [Google Scholar]
  15. Corral, S., Ferrero, M., & Goikoetxea, E.
    (2009) LEXIN: A lexical database from Spanish kindergarten and first-grade readers. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1009
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crossley, S. A., Cobb, T., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2013) Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Darnell, D. K. & Howes, D. H.
    (1972) Review of The American Heritage Word Frequency Book. Research in the Teaching of English, (), –. 10.58680/rte197220152
    https://doi.org/10.58680/rte197220152 [Google Scholar]
  18. de Castell, S. & Luke, A.
    (1983) Defining ‘Literacy’ in North American Schools: Social and Historical Conditions and Consequences, Journal of Curriculum Studies, :, –. 10.1080/0022027830150403
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027830150403 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dürlich, L. & François, T.
    (2018) EFLLex: A Graded Lexical Resource for Learners of English as a Foreign Language. InProceedings of LREC 2018, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eckes, T.
    (2009) Reference Supplement to the Manual for Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Section H: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement. InCouncil of Europe (Ed.).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Foster, K. R., Graziano, L., & Squire, J.
    (2022) Horace Mann Charter Schools: Their Past, Present, and Promise. Bellwether Education Partners.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. François, T., & De Cock, B.
    (2018) ELELex: a CEFR-graded lexical resource for Spanish as a foreign language. InPLIN Linguistic Day 2018: Technological innovation in language learning and teaching (poster).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. François, T., Volodina, E., Pilán, I. & Tack, A.
    (2016) SVALex: a CEFR-graded lexical resource for Swedish foreign and second language learners. InProceedings of LREC 2016, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. François, T., Gala, N., Watrin, P., & Fairon, C.
    (2014) FLELex: a graded lexical resource for French foreign learners. InProceedings of LREC 2014, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fulcher, G.
    (2010) The reification of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and effect-driven testing. Advances in Research on Language Acquisition and Teaching. Selected Papers, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gala, N., François, T., Bernhard, D. & Fairon, C.
    (2014) Un modèle pour prédire la complexité lexicale et graduer les mots. InProceedings of TALN 2014, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gougenheim, G.
    (1954) Le français élémentaire. The French Review, (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Greene, B. B. & Rubin, G. M.
    (1971) Automatic Grammatical Tagging of English. Department of Linguistics, Brown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hofland, K., & Johansson, S.
    (1982) Word frequencies in British and American English. Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Holmer, D., & Rennes, E.
    (2022) NyLLex: A Novel Resource of Swedish Words Annotated with Reading Proficiency Level. InProceedings of LREC 2022, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L.
    (1951) Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of experimental psychology, (), . 10.1037/h0056020
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056020 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2007) The Shaky Ground Beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Language Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00627_5.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_5.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Kilgarriff, A., Charalabopoulou, F., Gavrilidou, M., Johannessen, J. B., Khalil, S., Johansson Kokkinakis, S., … & Volodina, E.
    (2014) Corpus-based vocabulary lists for language learners for nine languages. Language resources and evaluation, (), –. 10.1007/s10579‑013‑9251‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-013-9251-2 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N.
    (1967) Computational Analysis of Present Day American English (1st edition). Brown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Laufer, B.
    (1997) What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy: Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. InN. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.) Vocabulary Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. –). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L. & Colé, P.
    (2004) MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, (), –. 10.3758/BF03195560
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195560 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A.
    (2001) Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Martínez, J. A., & García, M. E.
    (2004) Diccionario de frecuencias del castellano escrito en niños de 6 a 12 años. Salamanca: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Masterson, J., Stuart, M., Dixon, M., & Lovejoy, S.
    (2010) Children’s printed word database: Continuities and changes over time in children’s early reading vocabulary. British Journal of Psychology, , –. 10.1348/000712608X371744
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X371744 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nation, P.
    (1990) Teaching & Learning Vocabulary (1st edition). Heinle & Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C.
    (2007) The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S014271640707035X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640707035X [Google Scholar]
  42. North, B.
    (2020) The CEFR illustrative descriptors: Validation reference paper for researchers. [Unpublished manuscript]. Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. O’Keeffe, A., & Mark, G.
    (2017) The English Grammar Profile of learner competence: Methodology and key findings. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Milton, J.
    (2009) Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Short Run Press Ltd. 10.21832/9781847692092
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692092 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pintard, A., & François, T.
    (2020) Combining expert knowledge with frequency information to infer CEFR levels for words. InProceedings of the 1st READI Workshop, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rinsland, H. D.
    (1945) A basic vocabulary of elementary school children. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sherman, L. A.
    (1893) Analytics of Literature: A manual for the objective study of English prose and poetry. Ginn.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Soares, A. P., Medeiros, J. P., Simões, A., Machado, J., Costa, A., Iriarte, A., João de Almeida, J., Pinheiro, A. P., & Comesaña, M.
    (2014) ESCOLEX: A grade-level lexical database from European Portuguese elementary to middle school textbooks. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑013‑0350‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0350-1 [Google Scholar]
  49. Stuart, M., Dixon, M., Masterson, J., & Gray, B.
    (2003) Children’s early reading vocabulary: Description and word frequency lists. British Journal of Educational Psychology, , –. 10.1348/000709903322591253
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903322591253 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tack, A.
    (2021) Mark my words! On the automated prediction of lexical difficulty for foreign language readers. PhD University of Leuven & université catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tack, A., François, T., Desmet, P. & Fairon, C.
    (2018) NT2Lex: A CEFR-Graded Lexical Resource for Dutch as a Foreign Language Linked to Open Dutch WordNet. InProceedings of the BEA Workshop 2018, –. 10.18653/v1/W18‑0514
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-0514 [Google Scholar]
  52. Thissen, D. & Steinberg, L.
    (2009) Item response theory. InR. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.) The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, (pp. –). Sage Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9780857020994.n7
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020994.n7 [Google Scholar]
  53. Todirascu, A., Cargill, M., & François, T.
    (2019) PolylexFLE: une base de données d’expressions polylexicales pour le FLE. InProceedings of TALN 2019, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Volodina, E., Pilán, I., Llozhi, L., Degryse, B., & François, T.
    (2016) SweLLex: second language learners’ productive vocabulary. InProceedings of the joint workshop on NLP for Computer Assisted Language Learning and NLP for Language Acquisition, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Volodina, E., Alfter, D., & Tiedemann, T. L.
    (2022) Crowdsourcing ratings for single lexical items: a core vocabulary perspective. Slovenščina 2.0: empirične, aplikativne in interdisciplinarne raziskave, (), –. 10.4312/slo2.0.2022.2.5‑61
    https://doi.org/10.4312/slo2.0.2022.2.5-61 [Google Scholar]
  56. West, M.
    (1953) A general service list of English words. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wisniewski, K.
    (2017) Empirical learner language and the levels of the Common European Framework of Reference. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12223
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12223 [Google Scholar]
  58. Woods, A., & Baker, R.
    (1985) Item response theory. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/026553228500200202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200202 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zeno, S., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R.
    (1995) The Educator’s word frequency guide. Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S.
    (2002) Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2834
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2834 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.00024.fra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.00024.fra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error