Volume 101, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


There is a general consensus among researchers that most students of English as a foreign language (EFL) are weak in writing composition. One of the main reasons for their weakness is due to the fact that there is no general agreement among teachers on how to teach and/ or evaluate compositions.

Secondary school teachers in Jordan often complain that most students face problems and make errors when they write English compositions. These errors are usually reflected in school exams as well as in the General Secondary School Examination (Tawjihi), held annually by the Ministry of Education.

The main concern of this research is to study students' problems in writing English compositions in Jordanian Secondary Schools. A questionnaire has been set for this purpose. The research is expected to identify the most serious problems that secondary students face and recommend certain procedures to avoid these problems and improve students' writing ability in English compo-sitions.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


    (1988): "A Study of Teachers' Evaluation of English Composition in Secondary Schools in Jordan". Arab Journal for the Humanities, Kuwait University, Vol. 8, Issue No. 30, 386–404
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ALAWNEH, Ahmad
    (1985): A Comparative Study Between the Focused Efficient Method and the Traditional Method of Teaching English Composition for First Secondary Students in Jordan. An Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Department of Education, Yarmouk University, Jordan.
  3. BULMAN, Colin
    (1986): "Creative Writing in Higher Education". English in Education, Vol. 20, No. l,48–55.
    [Google Scholar]
    (1986): "Evaluating Compositions with Large Classes". ELT Journal40 (1), 20–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1987): "Towards Reality in writing class". ELT Journal41 (3), 204–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. COWAN, W.
    (1983): Writing. Brief Edition. Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ELBOW, P.
    (1973): Writing Without Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1981): Writing With Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FERRAR, M.
    (1986): "Realism, Reality, and Quasi-Reality in the Language Classroom". English Teaching Forum, XXIV (1), 19, 20, 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FLOWER, Linda S.
    (1979): "Writer-Based Prose: a Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing". College English41(1), 19–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FREEDMAN, A. and lam Pringle
    (1984): "Why Students can't Write Arguments?" English in Education. 18(2), 73–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GHADESSY, M.
    (1984): "Going Beyond the Sentence: Implications of Discourse Analysis for the Teaching of Writing Skill", IRAL, 22 (3), 213–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HUGHEY, Jane B.
    , et al (1983): Teaching ESL Composition: Principles and Techniques. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JACOBS, G.
    (1986): "Quickwriting: A Technique for Invention in Writing". ELT Journal, 40 (4), 282–290.
  15. KEYES, Joan R.
    (1984): "Peer Editing and Writing Success", TESOL Newsletter (Supplement No.l: Writing and Composition) 18(1), 11–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KNEPLER, Myrna.
    (1984): "Impromptu Writing to Increase Fluency". TESOLNewsletter (Supplement No.l: Writing and Composition)18(1), 15–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LANE, J. and C. Perrin
    (1984): Quickwriting: Why and How in the Classroom. University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MACRORIE, K.
    (1976): Telling Writing. Second Edition, Rochelle Park: Hayden.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PEARSE, R.
    (1983): "Realistic and Real English in the Writing Classroom". English Teaching Forum, XXI (3), 19–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PERL, Sandra
    (1979): The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers". Research in the Teaching of English, 13 (4).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PORTER, D.
    (1989): "A Sequel to an International Approach to Teaching Writing". English Teaching Forum. XXVII (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RAIMES, A.
    (1985): "What Unskilled ESL Students Do as They Write: A Classroom Study of Composing", TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 229–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ROSE, Mike.
    (1980): "Rigid Rules, Inflexible Plans, and the Stifling of Language: a Cognitive Analysis of Writer's Block". College Composition and Communication, 31 (4), 389–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SAKSENA, A.
    (1984): Linguistic Models, Pedagogical Grammars, and ESL Composition", IRAL, XXI (2), 137–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SAMPSON, G. P.
    (1981): "A Functional Approach to Teaching Writing". English Teaching Forum. XIX (3), 10–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SPACK, Ruth and Catherine Sadow.
    (1983): "Student-Teacher Working Journals in ESL Freshman Composition", TESOL Quarterly. 17 (4), 575–593.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. STOKES, Elizabeth
    (1984): "An ESL Writing Workshop, TESOL News-letter (Supplement No.l: Writing and Composition) 18 (1), 4–5.
    [Google Scholar]
    (1987): "To What Extent are Non-native Speakers Qualified to Correct Free Composition". British Journal of Language Teaching. XXV (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TAYLOR, Barry P.
    (1981): "Content and Written Form: a Two-Way Street". TESOL Quarterly, 15 (1), 5–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WOODWARD, M.R.
    (1981): "A Tutorial Component in the ESL Writing Course" ELT Journal, XXXV (2), 158–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ZAMEL, Vivian.
    (1984): "In Search of the Key: Research and Practice in Composition". InOn TESOL '83: the Question of Control. Jean Handscombe , Richard Orem , and Barry P. Taylor (Eds.), Washington, D.C.: TESOL, 195–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error