1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 103, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 103, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between the L2 proficiency of advanced EFL learners and biological lateral preference. The former is thought of as the person's advanced ability in English, developed within a school setting and involving both reading comprehension and grammatical and lexical knowledge - as represented by the Michigan Test of English Language Proficiency. The latter is conceptualized as a continuous and multifactorial construct that predicts the degree of the hemispheric specialization of cognitive functions in the human brain as well as the degree of hemisphericity as a personal trait. It is measured by the Lateral Preference Schedule, developed as an instrument to meet the research and clinical needs for a standardized measure of lateral preference. Sixty university students majoring in TEFL participated in the study. Overall, the findings suggest that, from the various lateral preference patterns, only those which involve footed-ness and handedness are related to L2 proficiency. The findings further suggest that the relationship between lateral preference and L2 proficiency is independent of differences in gender.

© 1994 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.103-104.03alp
1994-01-01
2024-10-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.103-104.03alp
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ALPTEKIN, C. and ATAKAN, S.
    1990: Field Dependence-Independence and Hemisphericity as Variables in L2 Achievement. Second Language Research6: 135–149.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. ANNETT, M. and MANNING, M.
    1990: Arithmetic and Laterality. Neuropsychologia28: 61–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BRYDEN, M.P.
    1982: Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. CASEY, M.B. , WINNER, E. , BENBOW, C. , HAYES, R. and DASILVA, D.
    1993: Skill at Image Generation: Handedness Interacts with Strategy Preference for Individuals Majoring in Spatial Fields. Cognitive Neuropsychology10:57–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. CERVENKA, E.J.
    1978: Michigan Test of English Language Proficiency. In Buros, O.K. , editor, The Eight Mental Measurements Yearbook, Vol.1, 104–106. Highland Park, New Jersey: Gryphon.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. CORMIER, P. , TOMLINSON-KEASEY, C. and GEARY, D.C.
    1988: Gender and Hemispheric Specialization Differences in the Learning of Morse Code Letters. Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society26: 399–402.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. DEAN, R.S.
    1979: Cerebral Laterality and Verbal-Performance Discrepancies in Intelligence. Journal of School Psychology17: 145–150.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 1982: Assessing Patterns of Lateral Preference. Clinical Neuropsychology4: 124–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 1988: Lateral Preference Schedule. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. DlZNEY, H.
    1965: Concurrent Validity of the Test of English as a Foreign Language at an American University. Educational and Psychological Measurement25: 1129–1131.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. EDWARDS, B.
    1989: Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain. Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. GALLOWAY, L. and SCARCELLA, R.
    1982: Cerebral Organization in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Is the Right Hemisphere more Involved?Brain and Language16: 56–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. GASS, S. and VERONIS, E.
    1986: Sex Differences in NNS/NNS Interactions. In Day, R. editor. Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition, 327–351. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. GAY, L.R.
    1976: Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. GORDON, H.W.
    1980: Cerebral Organization in Bilinguals: Lateralization. Brain and Language9: 255–268.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. GUR, R.C. and GUR, R.E.
    1974: Handedness, Sex and Eyedness as Moderating Variables in the Relation Between Hypnotic Suscep-tibility and Functional Brain Asymmetry. Journal of Abnormal Psychology83: 635–643.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. HAHN, W.K.
    1987: Cerebral Lateralization of Function: From Infancy through Childhood. Psychological Bulletin101: 376–392.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. HECEAN, H. and SAUGUET, J.
    1971: Cerebral Dominance in Lefthanded Subjects. Cortex7: 19–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. HUGDAHL, K. and FRANZON, M.
    1985: Visual Half-field Presentations of Incongruent Colour-words Reveal Mirror-Reversal of Language Lateralization in Dextral and Sinistral Subjects. Cortex21: 359–374.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. HUGHES, A.
    1988: Introducing a Needs Based Test of English Language Proficiency into an English Medium University in TurkeyIn Hughes, A. , editor, Testing English for University Study., 134–153. Hong Kong: Modern English Publications and the British Council.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. JACOBS, B.
    1988: Neurobiologicai Differentiation of Primary and Secondary Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10: 303–337.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. JOHNS, L.B.
    1989: Hemispheric Preference and Progressive-Part or Whole Practice in Beginning Typewriting. Perceptual and Motor Skills68: 359–364.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. JOHNSON, J.S. and NEWPORT, E.L.
    1989: Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language. Cognitive Psychology21:60–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. KIM, H. and LEVINE, S.C.
    1991: Inferring Patterns of Hemispheric Specializations for Individual Subjects from Laterality Data: A Two-task Criterion. Neuropsychologia29:93–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KlMURA, D.
    1987: Are Men’s and Women’s Brains Really Different?Canadian Psychology28/133–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. KlNSBOURNE, M.
    1974: Direction of Gaze and Distribution of Cerebral Thought Processes. Neuropsychologia12:279–281.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 1986a: Brain Organization as Elicited by Laterality Tests. Journal of Neurolinguistics2:365–370.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 1986b: Cerebral Representation of Language in Left and Right Hemispheres. Journal of Neurolinguistics2:371–381.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. LECOURS, A.R. and NESPOULOUS, J.
    1988: The Biology of Writing. In de Kerckhove, D. and Lumsden, C.J. , editors, The Alphabet and the Brain: The Lateralization of Writing, 231–245. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  30. LONG, M.H.
    1990: Maturational Constraints on Language Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12:251–285.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. MARKHAM, P.
    1988: Gender and Perceived Expertness of the Speaker as Factors in ESL Listening Recall. TESOL Quarterly22:397–406.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McGLONE, J.
    1980: Sex Differences in Human Brain Asymmetry: A Critical Survey. Behavioral and Brain Sciences3: 215–263.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. MENDELSOHN, S.
    1988: Language Lateralization in Bilinguals: Facts and Fantasy. Journal of Neurolinguistics3: 261–291.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. PARADIS, M.
    1990: Language Lateralization in Bilinguals: Enough Already!Brain and Language39: 576–586.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. PATKOWSKI, M.S.
    1990: Age and Accent in a Second Language: A Reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics11: 73–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. PETERS, M.
    1988: Footedness: Asymmetries in Foot Preference and Skill and Neuropsychological Assessment of Foot Movement. Psychological Bulletin103: 179–182.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. PIAZZA, D. and ZATORRE, R.
    1981: Right Ear Advantage for Dichotic Listening in Bilingual Children. Brain and Language13: 389–396.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. PICA, T. , HOLLIDAY, L. , LEWIS, N. , BERDUCCI, D. and NEWMAN, J.
    1991: Language Learning through Interaction: What Role does Gender Play?Studies in Second Language Acquisition13: 343–376.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. ROTHLISBERG, B.A.
    1982: Lateral Preference and its Relation to Reading Achievement in Selected Reader Types. University of Wisconsin. Master’s thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. SACKHEIM, H.A. , WEIMAN, A.L. and GREGA, D.M.
    1984: Effects of Predictors of Hemispheric Specialization on Individual Differences in Hemispheric Activation. Neuropsychologia22: 55–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. SCOVEL, T.
    1988: A time to Speak: A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech. New York: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. SEARLEMAN, A.
    1983: Language Capabilities and the Right Hemisphere. In Young, A.W. , editor, Functions of the Right Cerebral Hemisphere, 87–111. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. SKEHAN, P.
    1989: Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. SOARES, C.
    1984: Left-hemisphere Language Lateralization in Bilinguals: Use of the Concurrent Activities Paradigm. Brain and Language23: 86–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. SUSSMAN, H. , FRANKLIN P. and SIMON, T.
    1982: Bilingual Speech: Bilateral Control?Brain and Language15: 124–142.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. WEISZ, J. , BALAZS, L. and ADAM, G.
    1990: Hemispheric Preference and Obesity. Neuropsychologia28: 883–887.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. ZATORRE, R.
    1989: On the Representation of Multiple Languages in the Brain: Old Problems and New Directions. Brain and Language36: 127–147.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.103-104.03alp
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error