1887
Volume 109, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper presents four case studies to demonstrate developments in oral proficiency made by advanced learners of English during two months in England. The data base consists of picture story oral narratives. Performance shortly after arrival in Britain is compared with that at the end of the two months. Assessment was by:

subjective reactions of a panel of experienced native-speaker EFL teachers

quantitative analysis of transcriptions of recordings.

An attempt is made to apply VORSTER’s (1980) components of proficiency developed for use with children mother tongue speakers. The main findings were as follows:

There was considerable dissension among teachers, so that the reliability of subjective teacher assessment in such cases must be seriously questioned.

Results on the objective quantitative measures were very chequered, suggesting that the variables chosen did not, in many cases, function well to identify developments over so short a period.

Nevertheless, there were clear trends towards improvements in productivity and modality (co-verbs).

There were signs of individual differences among subjects in route of development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.109-110.04len
1995-01-01
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. D'ANGLEJAN, A. , PAINCHAUD, G. & RENAUD, C.
    (1986) : Beyond the classroom : a study of communicative abilities in adult immigrants following intensive instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 20:185–205.
  2. BAARS, B.
    (1980) : The competing plans hypothesis : an heuristic viewpoint on the causes of errors in speech. In H.-W. Dechert & M. Raupach , (eds.), Temporal Variables in Speech: Studies in Honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler. The Hague: Mouton, 104–115.
  3. BACHMAN, L.
    (1988) : Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10:149–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BIALYSTOK, E.
    (1983) : Some factors in the selection and implementation of communication strategies. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (eds.), Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London : Longman, 100–108.
  5. BRUMFIT, C.
    (1984) : Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching : the Roles of Accuracy and Fluency. Cambridge University Press.
  6. CANALE, M.
    (1983) : On some dimensions of language proficiency. In J. W. OilerJr. (ed.), Issues in Language Teaching Research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 332–342.
  7. CANALE, M. & SWAIN, M.
    (1980) : Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1:1–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CARROLL, J.
    (1967) : Foreign language proficiency levels attained by language majors near graduation from college. Foreign Language Annals, 1:131–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CLARK, J. & CLIFFORD, R.
    (1988) : The FLI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques : Development, current status, and needed research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10: 129–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DAVIES, E.
    (1983) : Error evaluation : the importance of viewpoint. English Language Teaching Journal, 37/4:304–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DECHERT, H.-W.
    (1980) : Pauses and intonation as indicators of verbal planning in second-language speech productions : two examples from a case study. In H.-W. Dechert & M. Raupach , (eds.), Temporal Variables in Speech: Studies in Honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler. The Hague: Mouton, 271–285.
  12. DECHERT, H.-W. & LENNON, P.
    (1989) : Collocational blends of advanced second language learners : a preliminary analysis. In W. Oleksy (ed.), Contrastive Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 131–168.
  13. FILLMORE, C.
    (1979) : On fluency. In C. Fillmore , D. Kempler & W. Wang (eds.), Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behaviour. New York : Academic Press, 85–101.
  14. HENDRICKSON, J.
    (1980) : Evaluating spontaneous communication through systematic error analysis. Foreign Language Annals, 14: 357–364.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HIGGS, T. & CLIFFORD, R.
    (1982) : The push toward communication. In T. Higgs , (ed.), Curriculum, Competence and the Foreign Language Teacher. Skokie, Illinois : National Textbook Co., 37–69.
  16. HUGHES, A. & LASCARATOU, C.
    (1982) : Competing criteria for error gravity. English Language Teaching Journal36/3:175–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HUNT, K.
    (1965) : Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels. Research Report 3. Illinois : National Council of Teachers of English.
  18. (1970) : Syntactic Maturity in Schoolchildren and Adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35/1.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HYMES, D.
    (1972) : Towards Communicative Competence. Philadelphia : Pennsylvania University Press.
  20. JONES, R.
    (1979) : The oral interview of the Foreign Service Institute. In B. Spolsky (ed.), Advances in Language Testing. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics, 104–115.
  21. LENNON, P.
    (1990) : Investigating fluency in EFL:a quantitative approach. Language Learning40/3 : 387–417.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1991) : Error : some problems of definition, identification and distinction. Applied Linguistics12/2:180–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MCLAUGHLIN, B.
    (1990) : Restructuring. Applied Linguistics11/2: 113–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. MÖHLE, D.
    (1984) : A comparison of the second language speech production of different native speakers. In H.-W. Dechert , D. Möhle , & M. Raupach , (eds.), Second Language Productions. Tübingen, FRG : Gunter Narr Verlag, 26–49.
  25. PALMER, A.
    (1979) : Compartmentalised and integrated control : an assessment of some evidence for two kinds of competence and implications for the classroom. Language Learning, 29:169–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. PAWLEY, A. & SYDER, F.
    (1983) : Two puzzles for linguistic theory : nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. (eds.), Language and Communication. London: Longman, 191–226.
  27. QUIRK, R & GREENBAUM, S.
    (1973) : A University Grammar of English. London : Longman.
  28. SCHLEY, S. & SNOW, C.
    (1989) : The conversational skills of school-aged children. Unpublished MS, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA 02138.
  29. SCHMIDT, R.
    (1992)  Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition14/4: 357–386.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. SELINKER, L. & DOUGLAS, D.
    (1989) : Research methodology in contextually-based second language research. Second Language Research5:93–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SNOW, C.
    (1987) : Beyond conversation : second language learners' acquisition of description and explanation. In J. Lantolf & A. Labarca (eds.), Research in Second Language Learning : Focus on the Classroom. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 3–16.
  32. SNOW, C. & DOLBEAR, M.
    (1989) : The relation of conversational skill to language proficiency in second language learners. Unpublished MS, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA 02138.
  33. SVARTVIK, J.
    (1966) : On Voice in The English Verb. The Hague:Mouton.
  34. SWEET, H.
    (1899/1964) : The Practical Study of Languages. London : Dent. (Republished 1964, Oxford : The University Press.)
  35. TARONE, E.
    (1983) : On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics4/2 : 142–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. TARONE, E. & PARRISH, B.
    (1988) : Task-related variation in interlanguage:the case of articles. Language Learning38 : 21–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. THOMAS, M. H.
    (1983) : 'Did I say something wrong?' English Teaching Forum21:35–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. TIMMS, W. & ECCOTT, A.
    (1972) : International Picture Stories. London : Hodder and Stoughton.
  39. VALDMAN, A.
    (ed.) (1988) : Thematic issue on the evaluation of foreign language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10/2.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. VORSTER, J.
    (1980) : Manual for the Test of Oral Language Production (T.O.L.P.). Pretoria : South African Human Sciences Research Council.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.109-110.04len
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error