La Notion de Compétence linguistique

References

1. Allen, J.P.B , and Van Buren, Paul
   eds. 1971 Chomsky: Selected Readings. London, Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bach, Emmon.
   1965 «Linguistique structurelle et philosophie des sciences». Diogène, n° 51, 117–136.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bach, Emmon
   1968 «Nouns and noun phrases». In Bach and Harms eds.90–122.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert
   eds. 1968 Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bever, T.G.
   M.S. «The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures». To appear in Hayes, J.R. ed. Cognition and Language Learning. New York, Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Binnick, R.I. ; Davison, A. ; Green, G.M. ; Morgan, J.L.
   eds. 1969 Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. The Chicago Linguistic Society, Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chomsky, Noam
   1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague, Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chomsky, Noam
   1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T. Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chomsky, Noam
   1969 «Form and Meaning in Natural Language». In J.D. Roslansky , ed., Communication, Amsterdam, North-Holland65–85.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dubois, J.
    1964 Résolution des polysémies dans les textes écrits et structuration de l’énoncé. Colloque de linguistique appliquée, Nancy.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1968a «The Case for Case». In Bach and Harms , eds., 1–88.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, Charles J. Publication 41
    1968b «Review of Componential Analysis of General Vocabulary: the Semantic Structure of a Set of Verbs in English, Hindi and Japanese», by Bendix (I.J.A.L., Vol.32, N° 2, Publication 41 1966)» In Fillmore and Lehiste , eds., Working Papers in LinguisticsN° 2, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1969 «Types of Lexical Information». In F. Kiefer , ed., Studies in Syntax and Semantics, Dordrecht, Reidel, 109–132.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1970a «Subjects, Speakers, and Roles». In G. Drachman et al., eds., Working Papers in Linguistics N° 4, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1970b Course on Syntax. Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of America, Columbus, Ohio (unpublished).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gardin, J.C.
    1969 «Semantic Analysis Procedures in the Sciences of Man». Social Science Information, VIII-1, The Hague, Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gochet, Paul
    1970 (MS de) Logique, langage et universaux: Esquisse d’une théorie nominaliste de la proposition. A paraître: Paris, Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Harris, Zellig S.
    1968 Mathematical Structures of Languages. New York, Wiley-Interscience.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jacobs, R.A. and Rosenbaum, P.S.
    eds. 1970 Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham Mass., Ginn and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jespersen, Otto
    1924 The Philosophy of Grammar 1965 reprint.New York, Norton and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jespersen, Otto.
    1933 Essentials of English Grammar 1966 reprint.London, George Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Karttunen, Lauri
    1970 «The Logic of English Predicate Complement Constructions - A Guided Tour through Recent Work on Semantics». Non-publication Nr. 12 of the 1970 MSSB Mathmetica Linguistics Seminar. Read at the 1970 Summer Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Katz, J.J.
    M.S.Semantic Theory. M.I.T.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Katz, J.J. and Fodor, J.A.
    1964 «The Structures of a Semantic Theory. In Fodor and Katz . eds.The Structure of Language. Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 479–518.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Katz, J.J. and Postal, P.M.
    1964 An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kiparsky, Paul and Carol
    1968 «Fact». To appear in Bierwisch and Heidolph , eds., Recent Advances in Linguistics, The Hague, Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Labov, William
    1970 «Resolution of the Saussurian Paradox», «Discourse Analysis». Forum Lectures, Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of America, Columbus, Ohio (unpublished).
28. Lakoff, George.
    1968 «Instrumental Adverbs and the Concept of Deep Structure». Foundations of Language, 4, 4–29.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lakoff, George
    1969a «On Derivational Constraints». In Binnick et al., eds., 117–139.
30. Lakoff, George
    1969b «Pressuppositions and Relative Grammaticality». In Todd, Williams , ed., Philosophical Linguistics, Series I, Great Expectations (Evanston), 103–116.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lakoff, George
    1970a Linguistics and Natural Logic. Phonetics Laboratory, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (unpublished).
    [Google Scholar]
32. 1970b «Natural Logic and Lexical Decomposition». InPapers from the 6th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, Illinois, 340–362.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lakoff, Robin
    1970 «IF’s, AND’s, and BUT’s about conjunction». Revised version of a paper read at theOhio State UniversitySpring Semantics Festival April 1969 (unpublished).
34. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1967 Language and its Structure. New York, Harcourt, Brace and World.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1969 «On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command». In D.A. Reibel and S.A. Schane , Modern Studies in English. Readings in Transformational Grammar, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 160–186.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Langendoen, D. Terence
    1967a «On Selection, Projection, Meaning, and Semantic Content». InWorking Papers in Linguistics N° 1, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 100–108.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Langendoen, D. Terence
    1967b «The Accessibility of Deep Structures». InWorking Papers in Linguistics N° 1, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 118–127. Reprinted in Jacobs and Rosenbaum , eds., 99–104.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Langendoen, D. Terence
    1969 The Study of Syntax, The Generative-Transformational Approach to the Structure of American English. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Langendoen, D. Terence
    1970 Essentials of English Grammar. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lee, P. Gregory
    1969 «Subjects and Agents». In Dale E. Eliot et al., eds., Working Papers in Linguistics N° 3, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 36–113.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1969 Towards a Semantic Description of English. London, Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lyons, John
    1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mc Cawley, James D. Papers from the
    1968 «Lexical Insertion in a Transformational Grammar without Deep Structure». In Bill J. Darden et al., eds., Papers from the4th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, Illinois, 71–80.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mc Cawley, James D.
    1970 «English as a VSO Language». Language, Vol.46, N° 2, 286–299.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Nivette, Jos
    1970 Principes de grammaire générative. Bruxelles, Labor (Nathan, Paris).
    [Google Scholar]
46. Piaget, Jean
    1968 Le structuralisme. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Postal, Paul M.
    «Anaphoric Islands». In Binnick, R.I. et al eds. 205–239.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ross, John Robert
    . «On Declarative Sentences». In Jacobs and Rosenbaum eds. 222–272.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Ruwet, Nicolas
    1967 Introduction à la grammaire générative. Paris, Plon 1967 (Citations extraites du M.S. de: La théorie de la syntaxe dans la grammaire générative, mémoire de doctorat, Université de Liège, 1966–1967).
    [Google Scholar]
50. Weinreich, U.
    1967 «Explorations in Semantic Theory». In T. A. Sebeok , ed., Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol.III, 394–477.
    [Google Scholar]