1887
Volume 125, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The discourse strategies and social implications of speech importantly overlap to govern our relationships in person versus person, group versus group, and person versus group capacities. We apply here Speech Act Theory to communicative interactions with respect to person versus group by discourse - analytically studying the utterances of a nation’s president to his fellow country men and women. Based on the extensions by GRICE (1975), VAN DIJK (1977) and LEECH (1989) of AUSTIN’S (1962) Speech Act Theory, we examine the promise by a Nigerian Military President to return the country to democratic rule and the extent to which he kept his word. The syntactic and semantic frameworks are combined with the pragmatic acts to bring out the strategy of the spoken discourse. Saying, in the view of the theory, is tantamount to doing. Consequently, utterances carry the social responsibility weight, and there is great honour in redeeming the social weight of utterances through commensurate action. Speech acts executed with the consideration of this obligation as well as sincerity of action in mind can lead to development. However, we find that the promise in the Nigerian President’s speech acts to return the country to democracy is not fuiflied. Considering the primacy of the spoken word in the political realm, which can affect development in many ways, this paper strongly recommends that public leaders should bridge the familiar opposition between promise and fulfilment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.125-126.03ior
1999-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ADEGBIJA, E.
    (1982) : A Speech act analysis of consumer advertisements in the “Nigerian Daily Times”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bloornington, Indiana. University Microfilms International, No. 8307973.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1987) : “Speech act functions : Dimensions of communication and meaning in the English language in Nigeria.” ITL Review of Applied Linguistics76:43–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1988) : “My friend, where is Anini? : Decoding the meaning of utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics12(2)177–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1995) : ‘I, Major - General X’ : Discourse tacts in military coup speeches in NigeriaText15(2):253–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AUSTIN, J.L.
    (1962) : How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BACH, K. and HARNISH, R.M.
    (1979) : Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BROWN, G. and YULE, G.
    (1989) : Discourse AnalysisCambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CANDLIN, C.N.
    (1977) : “Introduction” In M. Coulthard 1977 An Introduction to Discourse AnalysisLondon : Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CHURCH, G.J.
    (1998) : “Helping the Helpless” Time, March 9,1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. COULTHARD, M.
    (1977) : An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London : Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FRIES, C.C.
    (1952) : The Structure of EnglishNew York : Harcourt and Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GRICE, H.P.
    (1975) : “Logic and conversation” In Cole, P. and Morgan, J.L. eds. 1975 Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3 : Speech Acts. New York : Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HALLIDAY, M.A.K and HASAN, R.
    (1984) : Cohesion in EnglishLondon : Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. IORAT1M-UBA, G.A.
    (1989) : Cohesion in the written Text : An examination of the editorials of two Nigerian Newspapers published in English - “The Guardian” and “New Nigerian” M.A Dissertation. University of Jos, Nigeria.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KEENAN, E.O.
    (1974) : “The Universality of conversational postulates” Language in Society5:67–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LARKIN, D. and O’MALLEY, M.H.
    (1973) : “Declarative sentences and the rule-of-conversation hypothesis” In : Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago : Chicago Linguistic Society, 309–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LEECH, G
    1989 The Principles of PragmaticsLondon : Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MACDONALD, G. and PETTIT, P.
    (1981) : Semantics and Social ScienceLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. National Concord (Nigerian)
    National Concord (Nigerian)November 19, 1992.
  20. Newswatch (Nigerian)
    Newswatch (Nigerian)November 16, 1992.
  21. Nigerian Tribune
    Nigerian TribuneApril 26, 1993.
  22. ORWELL, G.
    (1973) : Nineteen Eighty FourLondon : Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. PALMER, F.R.
    (1986) : SemanticsLondon : Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. POST, T.A.
    (1993) : “A Despot’s Survival Guide.” Newsweek (American)April 26, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. QUIRK, R.
    et al (1995) : Longman dictionary of contemporary English. Essex : Longman Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SCHIFFRIN, D.
    (1994) : Approaches to DiscourseOxford, U.K. : Black-well.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SEARLE, J.R.
    (1969) : Speech ActsCambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tell (Nigerian)July 19, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. The Guardian (Nigerian)
    The Guardian (Nigerian)September 10, 1992; august 21, 1993; August 30, 1993.
  30. VANDIJK, T.A.
    (1977) : Text and ContextLondon : Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vanguard (Nigerian)
    Vanguard (Nigerian)March 27, 1993.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.125-126.03ior
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error