1887
Volume 127, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The main hypothesis sustained in this paper maintains that language is not a mere reflection of external reality but that language also powerfully contributes to it constitution. In this sense, the analysis shows the different symbolic constructs the interviewer establishes in the presentation of the information in various headlines and interviews on the Spanish public radio; symbolic constructs that contribute to the fictionalization of the events. By employing these communicative practices the interviewer manages to activate a cognitive model that presents the Government as having been betrayed by some public people, and as the victim of a conspiracy by certain sectors of the private media and individual judges.

The interpretation of these symbolic practices shows that they contribute to the delegitimation of people involved in those matters. In addition, they constitute an indirect alliance with the thesis defended by the ruling political party on those issues. There is also evidence which indicates that the power exercised by this public media is aimed at manipulating the audience's cognitive representations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.127-128.04mor
2000-01-01
2019-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ATKINSON, M.
    (1984) : Our masters' voices : The language and body language of politics. London : Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BAKHLIN, M.
    (1981) : The dialogic imagination. Texas : University of Texas Press 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BUSTAMANTE, E.
    (1989) : "TV and public service in Spain : A difficult encounter". Media, Culture and Society11:67–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CHILTON, P. and ILYIN , M.
    (1993): "Metaphor in political discourse : The case of the 'common European house'". Discourse and Society4/1:7–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CHILTON, P. and SCHAFFNER, Ch.,
    (1997) : "Discourse and politics", in T.A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction206–230. London : Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DURANTI, A.
    (1994) From grammar to politics. Linguistic anthropology in a Western Samoan village. Los Angeles : University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FOUCAULT, M.
    (1969) : L 'archéologie du savoir. Paris : Editions Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1991) : "Politics and the study of discourse", in G. Burchell , C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.), The faucault effect. studies and governmentality53–72. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GADAMER, H.-G.
    (1984) : "Texto e interpretación", in J. Domínguez Caparrós (ed.) Hermenéutica77–114. MadridArco/Libros 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GOFFMAN, E.
    (1981) : Forms of talk. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GUMPERZ, J.J.
    (1982) : Discourse strategies. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1992) : "Contextualization and understanding", in. A. Duranti and Ch. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context230–252. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KUMAR, K.
    (1975): "Holding the middle ground : The BBC, the public and the professional broadcaster". Sociology9:67–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LAKOFF, G.
    (1986) : Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LEWIS, P.M. and BOOTH, J.
    (1989) : El medio invisible. Radio pública, privada, comercial y comunitaria.Barcelona : Paidós 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LUKES, S.
    (1974) : Power: A radical view. London : Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MARTÍN ROJO, L. and VAN DIJK , T.A.,
    (1997) : "There was a problem, and it was solved ! : Legitimating the expulsion of 'ilegal' migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse", Discourse and Society8/4:523–566
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MORALES LÓPEZ, E. (1999) : "Presentación de la información en entrevistas de la radio pública española". Under editorial review.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PUJANTE, D.
    (1996) : El hijo de la persuasión. Quintiliano y el estatuto retórico, Instituto de Estudios Riojanos, Logroño.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PUJANTE, D. and MORALES LÓPEZ, E.
    (1997) : "Discurso político en la actual democracia española". Discurso (UNAM, México D.F.), 21/22:39–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RICOEUR, P.
    (1976): Teoría de la interpretación. México, D.F. : Siglo XXI Editores.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. THOMPSON, J.B.
    (1990) : Ideology and modern culture. Cambridge : Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. VAN DIJK, T.A.
    (1995a) : "Discourse analysis as ideology analysis", in C. Schaffner and A.L. Wenden (eds.), 17–33, Language and peace. Aldershot : Dartmouth.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1995b [(1987]) : Racismo y análisis crítico de los medios. Barcelona : Paidós 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1998) : Ideology : A multidisciplinary approach, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. VERSCHUEREN, J.
    (1995) : "The pragmatic return to meaning : Notes on the dynamics of communication, degrees of salience, and communicative transparency". Journal of Linguistic Anthropology5/2:127–156
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.127-128.04mor
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error