The Role of Voluntary Factors in Heritage Language Development

References

1. BAYLEY, R. , SCHECTER, S. , and TORRES-AYALA, B.
   (1996) : Strategies for bilingual maintenance : Case studies of Mexican-origin families in Texas. Linguistics and Education8:389–408.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BLOSSER, B.
   (1988) : Television, reading and oral language development : The case of the Hispanic child. NABE Journal13: 21–42.
   [Google Scholar]
3. CHO, G. and KRASHEN, S.
   (1998) : The negative consequences of heritage language loss and why we should care. In Krashen, S. , Tse, L. and McQuillan, J. (Eds.) Heritage Language Development. Culver City : Language Education Associates, pp.31–39
4. CHO, G. , CHO, K-S. , and TSE, L.
   (1997) : Why ethnic minorities want to develop their heritage language : The case of Korean Americans. Language, Culture, and Curriculum10(2): 106–112.
   [Google Scholar]
5. DEMOS, V.
   (1988) : Ethnic mother-tongue maintenance among Greek Orthodox Americans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language69: 59–71.
   [Google Scholar]
6. GARRETON, M.
   (1995) : Native speakers as language learners. In T. Dvork (Ed.) Voices From the Field : Experiences and Beliefs of our Constituents. Lincolnwood, IL : National Textbook Company.
7. GUPTA, A. and YEOK, S.P.
   (1995) : Language shift in a Singapore family. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development16(4):301–314.
   [Google Scholar]
8. HINTON, L.
   (1998) : Involuntary language loss among immigrants : Asian-American linguistic autobiographies. Paper presented atGeorgetown Round Table for Languages and Linguistics, May, 1998.
   [Google Scholar]
9. KONDO, K.
   (1998) : Social-psychological factors affecting language maintenance : Interviews with Shin Nisei university students in Hawaii. Linguistics and Education9(4):369–408.
   [Google Scholar]
10. KRASHEN, S.
    (1985) : The Input Hypothesis. Beverly Hills, CA : Laredo Publishing Co.
11. KRASHEN, S.
    (1994) : The pleasure hypothesis. In Alatis, J . (Ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1994 pp.299–322.
    [Google Scholar]
12. KRASHEN, S.
    (1993) : The Power of Reading. Englewood, CO : Libraries Unlimited.
13. KRASHEN, S.
    (1996) : Under Attack : The Case Against Bilingual Education. Culver City : Language Education Associates.
14. KRASHEN, S.
    (1998a) : Heritage language development : Some practical arguments. In S. Krashen , L. Tse and J. McQuillan (Eds.) Heritage Language Development. Culver City : Language Education Associates. pp.3–13.
15. KRASHEN, S.
    (1998b) : Language shyness and heritage language development. In S. Krashen , Tse, L. and J. McQuillan (Eds.) Heritage Language Development. Culver City : Language Education Associates, pp.41–49.
16. LEMBERGER, N.
    (1997) : Bilingual Education : Teachers' Narratives. Mahwah, NJ : Erbaum.
17. LANDRY, R. and Allard, R.
    (1992) : Subtractive bilingualism : The case of Franco-Americans in Maine's St. John Valley. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development13(6):515–544.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LI, W.L.
    (1982) : The language shift of Ckinese-Americans. InternationalJournal of the Sociology of Language38: 109–124.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MCQUILLAN, J.
    (1996) : How should heritage languages be taught? The effects of a free voluntary reading program. Foreign Language Annals29: 56–72.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MCQUILLAN, J.
    (1998) : The use of self-selected and free voluntary reading in heritage language programs: A review of research. In S. Krashen , L. Tse and J. McQuillan (Eds.) Heritage Language Development. Culver City : Language Education Associates, pp.73–87.
21. PORTES, A. and HAO, L.
    (1998) : E Pluribus Unum : Bilingual and loss of language in the second generation. Sociology of Education71:269–294.
    [Google Scholar]
22. RUMBAUT, R.
    (1995) : The new Californians : Comparative research findings on the educational progress of rmmigrant children. In R. Rumbaut and W. Cornelius (eds.) California's Immigrant Children : Theory, Research, and Implications for Educational Policy. San Diego : Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, pp. 17–69.
    [Google Scholar]
23. TSE, L.
    (1995) : Language brokering among Latino adolescents : Prevalence, attitudes, and school performance. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences17:180–193.
    [Google Scholar]
24. TSE, L.
    (1996) : Language brokering in linguistic minority communities : The case of Chinese- and Vietnamese-American students. Bilingual Research Journal29(3,4):485–498.
    [Google Scholar]
25. TSE, L.
    (1998a) : Affecting affect : The impact of heritage language programs on student attitudes. In S. Krashen , L. Tse and J. McQuillan (Eds.) Heritage Language Development. Culver City : Language Education Associates. pp.51–72.
26. TSE, L
    (1998b) Ethnic identity formation and its implications for heritage language development. In S. Krashen , L. Tse and J. McQuillan (Eds.) Heritage Language Development. Culver City : Language Education Associates, pp.15–29.
27. TSE, L. and MCQUILLAN, J.
    (1997) : Changing reading attitudes : The power of bringing books into the classroom. In R. Constantino (Ed.) Literacy, Access, and Libraries among the Language Minority Population. Lanham, MD : Scarecrow. pp.193–208.
28. VELTMAN, C.
    (1983) : Language shift in the United States. Berlin : Mouton.
29. WILLIG, A.
    (1985) : A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research55(3):269–317.
    [Google Scholar]
30. WONG-FILLMORE, L.
    (1991) : When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly6: 323–346.
    [Google Scholar]