1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 133, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 133, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The findings of this study add to the growing number of reports in which investigators claim to have located adult second language learners who, under rigorous test conditions, manage to pass as native speakers in L2. The aims of this paper were two, first, to provide a detailed account of how we tested and qualified our Anglophones as native-like speakers of French and, second, to suggest that, interesting as our data were, more questions emerge than do answers.

Seven of 18 English/French bilinguals, having acquired L2 after the age of 16, were selected by means of a pre-test interview with three Francophones as “potentially of French-speaking background.” These seven, along with three Francophone controls, recited an 81-word passage in French onto a tape-recorder. Sixty-eight native-speaking French raters, of similar dialectal background and weak in English, each heard one of four tapes with differing random roders of the 10 passages, their task being to designate each voice as “Franco-phone” or “non-Francophone.” Four of our seven English-Franch bilinguals obtained ratings statistically comparable to those of our three Francophone controls.

© 2001 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.133-134.01neu
2001-01-01
2023-09-28

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.133-134.01neu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AITCHISON, J.
    (1994) Predestinate Grooves : Is There a Preordained Language "Program"?In V.P. Clark , Eschholz, P.A. , & A.F. Rosa (Eds.), Language : Introductory Readings (5th Edition), (pp.117–138). New York, NY : St. Martin's Press Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSON, P. J. & GRAHAM, S.M.
    (1994) Issues in Second Language Phonological Acquisition among Children and Adults. Topics in Language Disorders14, 2, 84–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. ANSELMO, A.
    (1993) : Language Aptitude and its Relationship to Bilingualism. Geolinguistics19, 76–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ARCHIBALD, J.
    (1998) : Second Language Phonology, Phonetics, and Typology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition20, 2, 189–211.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BAILLY, S.
    (1993) "Girls Are More Talented with Languages" : Investigation of an Accepted Idea. Mélanges Centre de Recherches et d'Applications pédagogiques en Langues, 21, 43–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BONGAERTS, T. , SUMMEREN VAN, C. , PLANKEN, B. , & SCHILS, E.
    (1997) Age and Ultimate Attainment in the Pronunciation of a Foreign Language. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 19, 4, 447–465.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BONGAERTS, T. , PLANKEN, B. , SCHILS, E.
    (1995) : Can Late Starters Attain a Native Accent in a Foreign Language? A Test of the Critical Period Hypothesis. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition : A Critical Look at the Critical Period Hypothesis, (pp.30–50). Clevedon, England : Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. CLAHSEN, H. & MUYSKEN, P.
    (1986) The Availability of Universal Grammar to Adult and Child Learners- A Study of the Acquisition of German Word Orders. Second Language Learning2, 93–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. EHRMAN, M.
    (1998) The Modern Language Aptitude Test for Predicting Learning Success and Advising Students. Applied Language Learning39, 1, 49–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. EVERETT, L.
    (1990) Assessing the State of Language Acquisition Sensitive Period Hypotheses. PALM, 5, 37–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. FELIX, S.W.
    (1985) More Evidence on Competing Courrier- LD32 Cognitive Courrier-LD32 Systems Courrier- LD32. Second Language Research13, 4, 374–385.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. FLEGE, J.E. , BOHN, O.S. , & JANG, S.
    (1997) Effects of Experience on Non-Native Speakers' Production and Perception of English Vowels. Journal of Phonetics25, 4, 437–470.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. FLEGE, J.E.
    (1995) Second Language Speech Learning : Theory, Findings, and Problems. In S. Winifred (Eds.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience : Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp.233–277). Timonium, MD : York Press, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. FLEGE, J.E. , MUNRO, M.J. , & FOX, R.A.
    (1994) Auditory and Categorical Effects on Cross-Language Vowel Perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 6, 3623–3641.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. FLEGE, J.E. , & Wang, C.
    (1989) Native-Language Phonotactic Constraints Affect How Well Chinese Subjects Perceive the Word-Final English /t/-/d/ Contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 4, 299–315.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. FLEGE, J.E.
    (1987) A Critical Period for Learning to Pronounce Foreign Languages?Applied Linguistics8, 2, 162–177.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. GRIMSHAW, G.M. , ADELSTEIN, A. , BRYDEN, M. P. & MACKINNON, G.E.
    (1998) First Language Acquisition in Adolescence : Evidence for a Critical Period for Verbal Language Development. Brain and Language63, 2, 237–255.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. HURFORD, J.R.
    (1991) The Evolution of the Critical Period for Language Acquisition. Cognition, 40, 3, 159–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. IOUP, G. , BOUSTAGUI, E. , EL TIGI, M. , & MOSELLE, M.
    (1994) Reexamining the Critical Period Hypothesis : A Case Study in a Naturalistic Environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition16, 73–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. JOHNSON, J.S. , & NEWPORT, E.L.
    (1991) Critical Period Effects on Universal Properties of Language. Cognition39, 3, 215–218.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. LENNEBERG, E.
    (1967) Biological Foundations of Language. New York : John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LOCKHEAD, G.R.
    (1982) Practically Perfect Performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America71, 755–756.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. LONG, M.H.
    (1993) Second Language Acquisition as a Function of Age : Research Findings and Methodological Issues. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.), Progression and Regression in Language : Sociocultural Neuropsychological, and Linguistic Perspectives (pp.196–221). Cambridge, England : Cambridge Univ. Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. (1990) Maturational Constraints on Language Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12, 251–285.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. MACKEY, W.F.
    (1983) Six Questions Concerning the Value of the L1/L2 Dichotomy. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata15, 2–3, 23–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. MAJOR, R.C.
    (1993) Sociolinguistic Factors in Loss & Acquisition of Phonology. In K. Hyltenstam , & A. Viberg (Eds.) Progression and Regression in Language : Sociocultural, Neuropsychological, and Linguistic Perspectives (pp.463–478). Cambridge, England : Cam-bridge U Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. MARKHAM, D.J.
    (1997) Phonetic Imitation, Accent, and the Learner. Dissertation Abstracts International, C : Worldwide, 58, 3, 778–779.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. MEISEL, J.M.
    (1997) The L2 Basic Variety as an I-Language. Second Language Research13, 4, 374–385.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. MORAIS, J. , CONTENT, A. , BERTELSON, P. , CARY, L. , & KOLINSKY, R.
    (1988) Is There a Critical Period for the Acquisition of Segmental Analysis?Cognitive-Neuropsychology5, 3, 347–352.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. MORFORD, J.P. , SINGLETON, J.L. & GOLDIN-MEADOW, S.
    (1995) From Home in to ASL : Identifying the Influences of a Self-Generated Childhood Gesture System upon Language Proficiency in Adulthood. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development19, 2, 403–414.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. MOYER, A.
    (1999) Ultimate Attainment in L2 Phonology : The Critical Factors of Age, Motivation, and Instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21, 1, 81–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. NEUFELD, G.
    (1979) Towards a theory of Language Learning Ability. Language Learning29, 229–241.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (1978) A Theoretical Perspective on the Nature of Linguistic Aptitude. IRA-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching16, 1, 15–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. NOVOA, L. , FEIN, D. , & OBLER, L.
    (1988) Talent in Foreign Languages : A Case Study. In L. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.). The Exceptional Brain. Neuropsychology of Latent & Special Abilities (pp.294–302). New York : Clifford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. O'CONNOR, N. , SMITH, N. , FRITH, C. & TSIMPLI, I.M.
    (1994) Neuropsychology and Linguistic Talent. Journal of Neuro linguistics8, 2, 95–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. OYAMA, S.
    (1976) A Sensitive Period for the Acquisition of a Non-native Phonological System. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 3, 261–283.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. PATKOWSKI, M.S.
    (1994) The Critical Age Hypothesis and Interlanguage Phonology. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and Second Language Phonology, (pp.205–221). San Diego, CA : Singular Publishing Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. (1990) Age and Accent in a Second Language : A Reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics11, 1, 73–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. PRAKASH, P.
    (1984) Second Language Acquisition and Critical Period Hypothesis. Psycho-Lingua14, 1, 13–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. REES, N.S.
    (1972) A Talent for Language. Journal of Communication Disorders5 (2), 132–141.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. REVELL, J. , & NORMAN, S.
    (1998) NLP : What's it All About?Modern English Teacher7, 3, 7–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. REVES, T.
    (1978) The Ability to Imitate As a Characteristic of the Good Language Learner. Fifth International Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA).
     [Google Scholar]
  43. ROBINSON, P.
    (1997) Individual Differences and the Fundamental Similarity of Implicit and Explicit Adult Second Language Learning. Language Learning47, 1, 45–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. SCHACHTER, J.
    (1989) Testing a Proposed Universal. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp.73–88). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. SCHNEIDERMAN, E.I. , & DESMARAIS, C.
    (1988) The Talented Language Learner. Some Preliminary Findings. Second Language Research4, 91–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. SCHEIDERMAN, E.I. , & WESCHE, M.B.
    (1986) Right Hemisphere Processing and Foreign Language Aptitude. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics71, 43–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. SCHLAUG, G. , JÄNCKE, L. , HUANG, Y. , STEINMETZ, H.
    (1995) In Vivo Evidence of Structure Brain Asymmetry in Musicians. Science267, 699–701.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. SCOVEL, T.
    (1988) A Time to Speak : A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech. New York : Newbury House Publishers.
  49. (1969) Foreign Accents, Language Acquisition, and Cerebral Dominance. Language Learning, 19, 245–253.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. SELINKER, L.
    (1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics10, 209–231.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. SHIM, R.J.
    (1993) Sensitive Periods for Second Language Acquisition : A Reaction-Time Study of Korean-English Bilinguals. Issues and Development in English and Applied Linguistics (IDEAL)6, 43–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. SINGLETON, D.
    (1995) Introduction : A Critical Look at the Critical Period. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition : A Critical Look at the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp.1–29). Clevedon, England : Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. SORACE, A.
    (1982) Linguistic Aptitude and the Acquisition of Competence : A Research Project. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Aplicata14, 1, 67–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. SPADARO, K.
    (1998) A Sensitive Period for Lexical Acquisition?TESOL in Context8, 1, 17–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. STROZER, J.R.
    (1994) Language Acquisition After Puberty. Washington, DC : Georgetown U Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. THOGMARTIN, C.
    (1982) Age, Individual Differences in Musical and Verbal Aptitude, and Pronunciation Achievement by Elementary School Children Learning a Foreign Language. IRA-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 20, 1, 66–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. WARD, W.D. , & BURNS, E.M.
    (1982) Absolute Pitch. In D. Deutsch (Eds.), The Psychology of Music (pp.431–451). New York : Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. WELLS, W.
    (1978) Language Aptitude and Cognitive Style. Fifth International Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA).
     [Google Scholar]
  59. WUILLEMIN, D. , RICHARDSON, B. , & LYNCH, J.
    (1994) Right Hemisphere Involvement in Processing Later-Learned Languages in Multilinguals. Brain and language, 46, 4, 620–636.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. YOUNG-SCHOLTEN, M.
    (1996) A New Research Programme for the L2 Acquisition of Phonology. In P. Jordans & J. Lalleman (Eds.), Investigating Second Language Acquisition (pp.263–292). Berlin, Federal Republic Germany : Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. (1994) On Positive Evidence and Ultimate Attainment in L2 Phonology. Second Language Research10, 3, 193–214.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.133-134.01neu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error