1887
Volume 156, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Letter Writing
 
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.156.31der
2008-01-01
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beadle, R. & C. Richmond
    (eds.)(2006) Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century. Part 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, A.
    (1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society13:2.145–204. doi:  10.1017/S004740450001037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  3. Bousfield, D.
    (2006) The grand debate: where next for politeness research?Culture, Language and Representation3:9–16
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinton, L.J.
    (2001) Historical discourse analysis. InD. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Ehernberger Hamilton (eds.) The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 138–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, P. & S. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, N.
    (ed.)(2004) [1971, 1976] Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century. Parts 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Rycker, T.
    (1987) Turns at writing: The organization of correspondence. InJ. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 613–647.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dossena, M.
    (2006) Forms of self-representation in nineteenth-century business letters. InM. Dossena & I. Taavitsainen (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English. (Studies in Language and Communication 40). Bern: Peter Lang, 173–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fairclough, N.
    (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2003) Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Geeraerts, D.
    (2006) Methodology in cognitive linguistics. InG. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 21–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyland, K.
    (2002) Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. InJ. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse. London: Longman, 115–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jucker, A. H.
    (1995) Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2005) News discourse: Mass media communication from the seventeenth to the twenty-first century. InJ. Skaffari, M. Peikolai, R. Carroll, R. Hiltunen & B. Warvik (eds.), Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 7–21. doi:  10.1075/pbns.134.04juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.04juc [Google Scholar]
  15. Swales, J.
    (1998) Other floors, other voices: A textology of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Teubert, W.
    (ed.)(2007) Text corpora and multilingual lexicography. (Benjamins Current Topics 8). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/bct.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Traugott, E.C.
    (2004) Historical pragmatics. InL.R. Horn & G.L. Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 538–561.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Verschueren, J.
    (1999) Understanding pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Verschueren, J., J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert & Chr. Bulcaen
    (eds.)(2003) Handbook of Pragmatics: 2001 & 2002 Installments. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Werkhofer, K.T.
    (1992) Traditional and modern views: The social constitution and the power of politeness. InR. J. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language. Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 155–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wood, L.A. & R.O. Kroger
    (2000) Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Xie, Ch.
    (2003) Review ofHandbook of Pragmatics: 2001 & 2002 lnstallments byJ. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert & Chr. Bulcaen (eds.)(2003) LINGUIST List 14.3179. Available fromwww.linguistlist.org/issues/14/14-3179.html.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.156.31der
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error