1887
Volume 159, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Becoming academically literate involves two main parties: teaching staff and students. Previous research (Belcher, 1994; Cotton, 2004; Van de Poel & Brunfaut, 2004) has indicated that a discrepancy exists between the interpretations of and expectations about academic literacy of teaching staff on the one hand and students on the other. The different interpretations of academic literacy and the lived experiences of both parties need to be identified before the existing discrepancy between the concept as used by teaching staff and students can be narrowed or even bridged. This article is based on the results of a study conducted at the University of Antwerp in 2009. It aims to shed light on the students’ interpretation of academic literacy and integrate the student perspective in a definition of academic literacy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.159.01ryc
2010-01-01
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Belcher, D.
    (1994) The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (1), 23–34. 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90022‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90022-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolitho, R., Carter, R., Hughes, R., Ivanic, R., Masuhara, H., & Tomlinson, B.
    (2003) Ten questions about language awareness. ELT Journal57 (3). Retrieved fromeltj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/57/3/251. 10.1093/elt/57.3.251
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.251 [Google Scholar]
  3. Braine, G.
    (2002) Academic literacy and the nonnative graduate student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 59–68. 10.1016/S1475‑1585(02)00006‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00006-1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunfaut, T.
    (2008) Foreign language reading for academic purposes. Students of English (native speakers of Dutch) reading English academic texts. (Unpublished PhD. Thesis). University of Antwerp, Belgium.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carkin, S.
    (2005) English for academic purposes. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.85–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cotton, F.
    (2004) ‘The lecturer doesn’t want my opinion’. Mismatched expectations: Pedagogical approaches. InL. E. Sheldon (Ed.), Directions for the future: Issues in English for academic purposes (pp.91–102). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Jonge, P. & Slaets, J.
    (2005) Response sets in self-report data and their associations with personality traits. The European Journal of Psychiatry19(4), 209–214. 10.4321/S0213‑61632005000400002
    https://doi.org/10.4321/S0213-61632005000400002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans, S. & Green, C.
    (2007) Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes6(1), 3–17. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferenz, O.
    (2005) EFL writers’ social networks: Impact on advanced academic literacy development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes4(4), 339–351. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Foddy, W.
    (2004) Checks to ensure that questions worked as intended. InM. Bulmer (Ed), Questionnaires (pp.119–131). London: Sage Publications.
  11. Hyland, K.
    (1997) Is EAP necessary? A survey of Hong Kong undergraduates. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7. Retrieved fromwww.cuhk.edu.hk/ajelt/vol7/art5.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2009) Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum International Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Johns, A. M.
    (1997) Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CBO9781139524650
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524650 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kachru, B. B.
    (1992) Teaching world Englishes. InB. B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (pp.355–366). Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Littlewood, W.
    (1999) Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics20(1), 71–94. 10.1093/applin/20.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.1.71 [Google Scholar]
  16. Leki, I.
    (2006) Negotiating socioacademic relations: English learners’ reception by and reaction to college faculty. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 136–152. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Brien, D.
    (n.d.). Questionnaire design. RetrievedApril, 8, 2010fromwww.cc.gatech.edu/classes/cs6751_97_winter/Topics/quest-design/
  18. Payne, S.
    (2004) Who left it open? A description of the free-answer question and its demerits. InM. Bulmer (Ed), Questionnaires (pp.119–131). London: Sage Publications.
  19. Pennycook, A.
    (2001) Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc..
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Spack, R.
    (1997) The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language.Written Communication14 (1), 3–62. 10.1177/0741088397014001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014001001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Van de Poel, K.
    (2004) Improving the academic writing skills of language students the Scribende project. InR.Wilkinson (Ed.), Integrating content and language: Meeting the challenge of a multilingual higher education, Maastricht (pp.242–50). Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Van de Poel, K. & Brunfaut, T.
    (2004) Bridging the gap between staff expectations and student interpretations of academic writing -the case of Scribende. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures New Series2, 329–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Van de Poel, K. & Gasiorek, J.
    (2008) Writing in an academic context: a multi-faceted approach to program development. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve32, 349–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams, E.
    (2004) Literacy studies. InA. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp.576–603). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757000.ch23
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch23 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.159.01ryc
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error