1887
Volume 160, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In an effort to better understand Latin American cultural perspectives that should be communicated to students as part of their learning to function in Spanish, a survey articulating 26 hypothesized cultural perspectives of modern Latin Americans was administered to 58 individuals from Mexico and Peru. Survey items were based mainly on the Kluckhohn Model’s five areas: human nature, man-nature, time, activity and relations. Results revealed some statistically significant differences between Mexicans and Peruvians, as well as among participants based on sex, age and rural vs. urban background, but only on a very limited number of the 26 items for each of these four variables. The overall results suggested general, and sometimes very strong, agreement with most of the survey items. Only four of the items produced an average low enough to be indicative of more disagreement than agreement. Participant comments provided further insight into individual cultural perspectives. Results provide important implications regarding the cultural component in the teaching of Spanish.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.160.03sto
2010-01-01
2019-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aleksandrowicz-Pędich, Draghicescu, L. J., Issaiass, D. & Šabec, N.
    (2003) The views of teachers of English and French on intercultural communicative competence in language teaching. InI. Lázár (Ed.), Incorporating intercultural communicative competence in language teacher education (pp. 7–38). Kapfenberg, Austria: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beacco, J. & Byram, M.
    (2003) Guide for the development of language education policies in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  3. Brooks, N.
    (1997) Teaching culture in the foreign language classroom. InP. R. Heusinkveld (Ed.), Pathways to culture (pp.11–37). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byram, M., Nichols, A & Stevens, D.
    (Eds.) (2001) Developing intercultural competence in practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  5. Hall, E.T.
    (1959) The silent language. New York: Fawcett World Library.
  6. Hofstede, G.
    (1984) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  7. Kluckhohn, F. R. & Strodtbeck, F. L.
    (1961) Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row.
  8. Kohls, L. R.
    (1984) Survival kit for overseas living (2nd ed.) Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural.
  9. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project
    National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (2006) Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century (3rd ed.) Lawrence, Kansas: Allen Press.
  10. Nostrand, H. L.
    (1977) The Emergent Model (Structures inventory of a sociocultural system) applied to contemporary France. Contemporary French Civilization, 2, 277–294. doi:  10.3828/cfc.1978.2.2.007
    https://doi.org/10.3828/cfc.1978.2.2.007 [Google Scholar]
  11. Omaggio Hadley, A.
    (2001) Language teaching in context (3rd ed.) Boston: Thomson Heinle.
  12. Ortuño, M. M.
    (1991) Cross cultural awareness in the foreign language class: The Kluckhohn Model. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 449–459. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1991.tb05382.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05382.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Parsons, J. & Junge, P.
    (2001) ‘Why do Danes put their elderly in nursing homes?’ - Working outside the classroom with adult second language learners.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. InM. Byram, A. Nichols & D. Stevens Eds. Developing intercultural competence in practice (pp.203–216). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 203–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pinto, D.
    (2000) Intercultural communication: A three-step method for dealing with differences. Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
  16. Schulz, R. A.
    (2007) The challenge of assessing cultural understanding in the context of foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 9–22. doi:  10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2007.tb02851.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02851.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Seelye, H. N.
    (1993) Teaching culture: Strategies of intercultural communication. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC.
  18. Sercu, L.
    (2002) Autonomes Lernen im interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht: Kriterien für die Auswahl von Lerninhalten und Lernaufgaben. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 7(2), 16pp.Retrieved fromwww.spz.tu-darmstadt.de/projekt_ejournal/jg_07_2/beitrag/sercu1.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Skopinskaja, L.
    (2003) The role of culture in foreign language teaching materials: an evaluation from an intercultural perspective. InI. Lázár (Ed.), Incorporating intercultural communicative competence in language teacher education (pp.39–68). Kapfenberg, Austria: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.160.03sto
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error