1887
Volume 160, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the effect of previous foreign language (FL) contact on the acquisition of receptive and productive vocabulary by senior learners in the early stages of English acquisition. Additionally, we also explore the relationship between receptive vocabulary and productive vocabulary as well as the link between lexical competence and reading comprehension. Results confirm that false beginners consistently outperform true beginners, supporting previous research findings (Fukai, 2000; Watt, 1997). Receptive and productive vocabulary were found to be positively correlated, which indicates a direct relationship between the passive and the active knowledge of FL vocabulary. In agreement with previous research (Agustín Llach and Terrazas Gallego, 2009; Laufer, 1992; Quian, 2002), we found a positive correlation between senior learners’ lexical competence and their reading comprehension.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.160.06adr
2010-01-01
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alba, O.
    (1998) Variable léxica y dialectología hispánica, La Torre. Revista de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, 7-8, 299–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agustín Llach, M.P. & Terrazas Gallego, M.
    (2009) Examining the relationship between receptive vocabulary and written skills of primary school learners. Atlantis, 31 (1), 11–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Agustín Llach, M.P., Fernández Fontecha, A. & Moreno Espinosa, S.
    (2005) Responding to different composition topics: A quantitative analysis of lexical error production. Glosas Didácticas. Revista Electrónica Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas y sus Culturas, 13, 129–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aitchison, J.
    (1994) Words in the mind. An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Birdsong, D.
    (1999) Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  6. Blacklock, K. L.
    (1985) Lifelong learning for the older adult. Journal of Extension, 23 (3), 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandt, H.
    (1983) The acquisition of German as a second language by two adult learners: A case study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
  8. Brown, C.
    (1983) The distinguishing characteristics of the older adult second language learner. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
  9. Burling, R.
    (1981) Social constraints on adult language learning in native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 279–290. doi:  10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1981.tb42015.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42015.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, L.
    (2002) Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language. Language Teaching Research, 62(2), 145–73. doi:  10.1191/1362168802lr103oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr103oa [Google Scholar]
  11. Carcedo González, A.
    (1998) Sobre las pruebas de disponibilidad léxica para estudiantes de español/LE. RILCE, 14 (2), 205–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Casado, M. A. & Dereshiwsky, M. I.
    (2001) Foreign language anxiety of univeristy students. College Student Journal, 35, 539–551.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cavanaugh, J.
    (1995) Ageing. InP. Bryant and A. Colman (Eds.), Developmental psychology (pp.70–89). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cenoz, J.
    (2002) Age differences in foreign language learning. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 135–6, 125–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Channel, J.
    (1988) Psycholinguistic consideration in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. InR. Carter & M. McCarthy, (Eds.) Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.8–16). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. De Haan, P. & van Esch, K.
    (2005) The development of writing in English and Spanish as foreign languages. Assessing Writing, 10, 100–16. doi:  10.1016/j.asw.2005.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2005.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Edelenbos, P. & Vinjé, M. P.
    (2000) The assessment of a foreign language at the end of primary (elementary) education. Language Testing, 17(2), 144–162. doi:  10.1191/026553200677333512
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026553200677333512 [Google Scholar]
  18. Etxebarría Arostegui, M.
    (1996) Disponibilidad léxica en escolares del País Vasco: Variación sociolingüística y modelos de enseñanza bilingüe. Revista Española de Lingüística, 26(2), 301–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fan, M.
    (2000) How big is the gap and how to narrow it? An investigation into the active and passive vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners. RELC Journal, 31(2), 105–19. doi:  10.1177/003368820003100205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820003100205 [Google Scholar]
  20. Frantzen, D. & Sieloff Magnan, S.
    (2005) Anxiety and the true beginner-false beginner dynamic in beginning French and Spanish classes. Foreign Language Annals, 38(2), 171–186. doi:  10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2005.tb02483.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02483.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Fukai, M.
    (2000) College Japanese classroom anxiety: True vs. false beginners. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Conference of Asian Affairs, Bloomington, IN, October 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. García Mayo, M. P. & García Lecumberri, M. L.
    (Eds.) (2003) Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  23. Germany, P. & Cortes, N.
    (2000) Léxico disponible en inglés como segunda lengua en instrucción personalizada. Estudios Pedagógicos, 26, 39–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Grognet, A. G.
    (1997) Elderly refugees and language learning. ELT, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Halff, N. E. & Frisbie, D. A.
    (1977) College foreign language study related to high school foreign language study. Modern Language Journal, 61, 401–406. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1977.tb05154.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1977.tb05154.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Haan, M. Shemanski, L., Jagust, W., Manolio, T. & Kuller, L.
    (1999) The role of APOE є4 in modulating effects of other risk factors for cognitive decline in elderly persons. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 40–46. doi:  10.1001/jama.282.1.40
    https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.1.40 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hanania, E. & Shikhani, M.
    (1986) Interrelationships among three tests of language proficiency: Standarized ESL, cloze and writing. TESOL Quaterly, 20(1), 97–100. doi:  10.2307/3586391
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586391 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hartmann, M. & Hasher, L.
    (1991) Aging and suppresion: memory for previously relevant information. Psychology and Aging, 6, 587–94. doi:  10.1037/0882‑7974.6.4.587
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.587 [Google Scholar]
  29. Horwitz, E.
    (1990) Attending to the affective domain in the foreign language classroom. InS. Magnan (Ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learner (pp.15–33). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B. & Cope, J.
    (1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05256.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Jarvis, S., Grant, L. Bikowski, D. & Ferris, D.
    (2003) Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 377–403. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jiménez Catalán, R. M.
    (2003) Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54–78. doi:  10.1111/1473‑4192.00037
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00037 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jiménez Catalán, R. M. & Moreno, S.
    (2005) Using Lex30 to measure the L2 productive vocabulary of Spanish primary learners of EFL. VIAL, Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 27–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiménez Catalán, R. M. & Ojeda Alba, J.
    (2008) CLIL instruction and EFL learners’ lexical productivity in an availability task. Paper presented at 2008 CLIL Fusion Conference, Tallin, Estonia, October 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2009) Disponibilidad léxica en inglés como lengua extranjera. Lenguaje y Textos, 30, 167–176.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Jiménez Catalán, R. M. & Terrazas Gallego, M.
    (2005–2008) The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners. Journal of English Studies, 5-6, 173–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jochems, W. & Montens, F.
    (1988) The multiple choice cloze test as a general language proficiency test. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 81, 139–159. doi:  10.1075/itl.81‑82.06joc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.81-82.06joc [Google Scholar]
  38. Joiner, E. G.
    (1981) The older foreign language learner: A Challenge for colleges and universities. Language in Education: Theory and Practice, 34. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 208 672).
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Knowles, M.
    (1980) The modern practice of adult education. Englewood Cliffs: Cambridge Adult Education.
  40. Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A. &. Scarcella, R. C.
    (1979) Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quaterly, 13, 573–582. doi:  10.2307/3586451
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586451 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lange, D., Prior, D. & Sims, W.
    (1992) Prior instruction, equivalency formulas and functional proficiency. Examining the problem of secondary school-college articulation. Modern Language Journal, 76, 284–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lapkin, S. & Swain, M.
    (1977) The use of English and French cloze tests in a bilingual education program evaluation: Validity and error analysis. Language Learning, 27(2), 279–314. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00123.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00123.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Laufer, B.
    (1989) What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension?InC. Lauren & M. Nordmann (Eds.), Special language: from humans thinking to thinking machines (pp.316–23). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1992) How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension?. InP. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (126–32). London: Macmillan. doi:  10.1007/978‑1‑349‑12396‑4_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12 [Google Scholar]
  45. (1998) The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?. Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255–71. doi:  10.1093/applin/19.2.255
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255 [Google Scholar]
  46. Laufer, B. & Nation, P.
    (1995) Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics16, 307–22. doi:  10.1093/applin/16.3.307
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307 [Google Scholar]
  47. (1999) A Vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33–51. doi:  10.1177/026553229901600103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103 [Google Scholar]
  48. Laufer, B. & Paribakht, T.
    (1998) The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48, 365–391. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.00046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00046 [Google Scholar]
  49. López-Mezquita Molina, M.
    (2003) La construcción de un instrumento de medida para la evaluación de la competencia léxica de los traductores de ingles al español. Apuntes, 11(4), 17–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2005) La evaluación de la dimensión léxica a nivel receptivo: Un marco para el diseño de instrumentos de medida. InCarrió Pastor. M. L. (Ed.), Perspectivas interdisciplinares de la lingüística aplicada.Vol 1: Adquisición y aprendizaje, enseñanza de lenguas y diseño curricular, 381–90. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. López Morales, H.
    (1999) Léxico disponible de Puerto Rico. Madrid: Arco Libros.
  52. López Rivero, E.
    (2008) Estudio de disponibilidad léxica en 43 estudiantes de ELE. Memoria del Máster de Enseñanza del Español como Lengua Extranjera. Universidad Antonio de Nebrija.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Losada Friend, M., Garrido Anes, E. & Bando Domínguez, J.
    (2007) Perspectivas y estrategias de innovación en la enseñanza del inglés en el aula de mayores. InM. Losada Friend, P. Ron Vaz, S. Hernández Santano & J. Casanova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th international AEDEAN conference (pp.1–6). Huelva: Universidad de Huelva.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. McMillan Dictionary online
  55. Madden, D., Connelly, S. & Pierce, T.
    (1994) Adult age differences in shifting focused attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 529–538. doi:  10.1037/0882‑7974.9.4.528
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.528 [Google Scholar]
  56. Meara, P.
    (1996) The dimensions of lexical competence. InG. Brown, K. Malmkjaer & J. Williams (Eds.) Performance and competence in second language acquisition. (pp.35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Meara, P. & Buxton, B.
    (1987) An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 4(2), 142–51. doi:  10.1177/026553228700400202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400202 [Google Scholar]
  58. Meara, P. & Fitzpatrick, T.
    (2000) Lex30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System, 28, 19–30. doi:  10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00058-5 [Google Scholar]
  59. Meara, P. and Jones, G.
    (1990) Tests of vocabulary size in English as a foreign language. Polyglot, 8(1), 1–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Melka, F.
    (1997) Receptive versus productive aspects of vocabulary. InN. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.84–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Miralpeix, I.
    (2008) The influence of age on vocabulary acquisition in English as a foreign language. Doctoral Dissertation. Universitat de Barcelona.
  62. Morgan, B. Q. & Oberdeck, L. M.
    (1930) Active and passive vocabulary. InE. W. Basgster-Collins (Ed.), Studies in modern language teaching (pp.213–221). Basingstoke: Mcmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Muñoz, C.
    (Ed. (2006) Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  64. Nakamura, T.
    (1997) What makes language learners false beginners?ERIC Digest. Washington, DC. ED420194.
  65. Nation, P.
    (1983) Teaching and testing vocabulary. Guidelines, 5(1), 12–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. (1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury.
  67. (1993) Measuring readiness for simplified material: A Test of the first 1,000 words of English. InM. L. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and application. RELC Anthology Series, 31, 193–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. OECD
    OECD (1977) Learning opportunities for adults. Paris: OECD.
  69. Ostwald, S. K. & Williams, H. Y.
    (1981) Optimizing learning in the elderly: A model. Lifelong Learning, 9(1) , 10–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Poon, L. W.
    (1985) Differences in human memory with aging: Nature, causes and clinical implications. InJ. Birren & K. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Quian, D.
    (2002) Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: an assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–36. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9922.00193
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193 [Google Scholar]
  72. Read, J.
    (1988) Measuring the vocabulary knowledge of second language learners. RELC Journal, 19, 12–25. doi:  10.1177/003368828801900202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828801900202 [Google Scholar]
  73. Rogers, A.
    (1996) Teaching adults. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  74. Rogers, J.
    (1989) Adults learning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  75. Roumani, J.
    (1978) Foreign language learning for older learners: Problems and approaches. Peace Corps, Washington, D.C.. ERIC Document. Retrieved fromwww.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED192627&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED192627.
  76. Samper Hernández, M.
    (2000) Disponibilidad léxica en alumnos de ELE. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
  77. Schaie, K.
    (1996) Intellectual development in adulthood: The Seattle longitudinal study. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  78. Schaie, K. & Geiwitz, J.
    (1982) Adult development and aging. Toronto: Little Brown.
  79. Schleppegrell, M.
    (1987) The older language learner. Washington, DC. (ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics FL No. 016 969).
  80. Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & C. Clapham
    (2001) Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary level test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Sifakis, N. C.
    (2003) Applying the adult education framework to ESP curriculum development: An integrative model. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 195–211. doi:  10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00008‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00008-X [Google Scholar]
  82. Singleton, D. & Ryan, L.
    (2004) Language acquisition: The age factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  83. Turner, G.
    (1983) Teaching French vocabulary: A training study. Educational Review, 35(1), 81–88. doi:  10.1080/0013191830350109
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191830350109 [Google Scholar]
  84. UNESCO
    UNESCO (1975) ISCED: International standard classification of educational data. Paris: UNESCO.
  85. UNESCO
    UNESCO (1976) Nairobi: Recommendations on the development of adult education: Declaration of Nairobi conference. Paris: UNESCO.
  86. Wagner, E.
    (1992) The older second language learner: A bibliographic essay. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 121–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Walsh, T. M., and K. C. Diller
    (1978) Neurolinguistic Foundations to Methods of Teaching a Second Language. International Review Of Applied Linguistics, 16, 1–14. doi:  10.1515/iral.1978.16.1‑4.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1978.16.1-4.1 [Google Scholar]
  88. Waring, R.
    (1997) A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. Immaculata, 1, 53–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Watt, Y. I.
    (1997) Attrition and performance in Japanese language courses: A study of articulation between high school and university levels. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 327–334. doi:  10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1997.tb02355.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02355.x [Google Scholar]
  90. Webb, S.
    (2008) Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 79–95. doi:  10.1017/S0272263108080042
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080042 [Google Scholar]
  91. Weigle, S.C.
    (2002) Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511732997
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
  92. Zdenek, J. W.
    (1986) A survival course for the older learner. Hispania, 69, 723–727. doi:  10.2307/342791
    https://doi.org/10.2307/342791 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.160.06adr
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error