Volume 172, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Task-based language teaching (TBLT) has increasingly been used in an Asian context. However, research into its implementation in Vietnam remains scarce. This study aims to investigate the effects of a task-based intervention on learners’ performance of listening, reading, speaking and writing tasks compared to the effects of a more traditional teaching method (TTM), which is based on form-focused instruction in combination with the Presentation-Practice-Production method. Through a pretest-posttest design, the researcher can measure the effects of the two settings on learners’ progress. The results show that the participants in the TBLT setting outperformed the participants in the TTM setting for speaking, listening and writing, but not for reading. The results of this study will encourage more research in the field of TBLT implementation in Vietnam.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, J. R.
    (1995) Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, A. A.
    (1997) The effects of sociocognitive writing strategy instruction on the writing achievement and writing self-efficacy of students with disabilities and typical achievement in an urban elementary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballard, B. & Clanchy, J.
    (1984) Study abroad: A manual for Asian students. Longmans, Kuala Lumpur.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Belenky, M. F.
    (1997) Women’s ways of knowing. New York, Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brindley, G.
    (1994) Task-centered assessment in language learning: the promise and the challenge. In N. Bird , P. Falvey , A. Tsui , D. Allison & A. McNeill (Eds.), Language and learning: papers presented at the Annual International language in Education Conference (Hong Kong 1993), 73–94. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Education Department.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Byrne, D.
    (1986) Teaching oral English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Canh, L.
    (2007) A historical review of English language education in Vietnam. In Y. H. Choi & B. Spolsky (Eds.), English education in Asia: History and policies. Seoul, South Korea: Asia TEFL.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2011) Form-focused instruction: A case study of Vietnamese teachers’ beliefs and practices. Unpublished PhD, The University of Waikato.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Canh, L. V. , & Barnard, R.
    (2009) Curricular innovation behind closed classroom doors: A Vietnam case study. Prospect, 24 (2), 20–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chalmers, D. & Volet, S.
    (1997) Common misconception about students from South-East Asia studying in Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 87–100. 10.1080/0729436970160107
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160107 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chow, A. K. W. , & Mok-Cheung, A. H. M.
    (2004) English language teaching in Hong Kong SAR: Tradition, transition, and transformation. In H. W. Kam & R. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Language policies and language education: The impact in East Asian countries in the next decade (pp.150–177). Singapore: Times Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cocroft, B. A. K. , & Ting-Toomey, S.
    (1994) Face-work in Japan and in the United States. Intercultural Journal of Intercultural Relation, 18, 469–506. 10.1016/0147‑1767(94)90018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(94)90018-3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cortazzi, M. , & Jin, L.
    (1996b) English Teaching and Learning in China. Language Teaching, 29 (2), 61–80. 10.1017/S0261444800008351
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800008351 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ducker, N.
    (2012) Enriching the curriculum with task-based instruction. Polyglossia, 22, 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2009) Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Lournal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 221–246. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2009.00231.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, R. & Shintani, N.
    (2014) Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. London, England: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Foster, P. & Skehan, P.
    (1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. 10.1017/S0272263100015047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047 [Google Scholar]
  19. Graham, S. , & Perin, D.
    (2007) Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools – A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, J.
    (2005) Cultures and organization-software of the minds (2nd edition) (New York, McGraw-Hill).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Huy Thinh, D.
    (2006) The role of English in Vietnam’s foreign language policy: A brief history. Paper presented at the19th Annual EA Education Conference. www.englishaustralia.com.au
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Leung, K.
    (1997) Negotiation and reward allocation across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organization psychology. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 640–675.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Littlewood, M.
    (1981) Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Littlewood, W.
    (2007) Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Lang. Teach, 40, 243–249. 10.1017/S0261444807004363
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004363 [Google Scholar]
  25. Loc, N.
    (2005) Tertiary education and strategies for teaching and learning foreign languages in Vietnam. Paper presented atConference on Teaching Tertiary English and International Relations in Vietnam Universities and Colleges, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Dai hoc Su pham.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Loi, N. V.
    (2011) Dynamic conceptions of input, output and interaction: Vietnamese EFL lecturers learning second language acquisition theory. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis: University of Waikato, New Zealand.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Long, M.
    (1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hylstenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (pp.77–79). Clevedon: Multilingual Matterns.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1988) Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp.115–141). New York. NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot , D. Coste , R. Ginsberg , & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp.39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
  30. (2015) Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Maley, A.
    (1983) A miracle of rare device: the teaching of English in China. In: J. M. Valdes (Eds.), Culture bound: bridging the cultural gap in language teaching. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 102–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ministry of Education and Training [MOET]
    Ministry of Education and Training [MOET] (2006) Chuong trinh giao duc pho thong: Mon Tieng Anh [English curriculum for the secondary school]. Hanoi, Vietnam: Education Publishing House.
  33. Nguyen, T. H.
    (2002) Vietnam: Cultural background for ESL/EFL teachers. Review of Vietnamese Studies, 2 (1), 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Norris, J. M.
    (2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M. Long and C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp.578–594). Cambridge: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2016) Current Uses for Task-Based Language Assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–244. 10.1017/S0267190516000027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000027 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nunan, D.
    (2003) The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia – Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 589–613. 10.2307/3588214
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214 [Google Scholar]
  37. Paltridge, B.
    (1992) EAP placement testing: an integrated approach. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 243–268. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(05)80012‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80012-2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Phuong-Mai, N. , Terlouw, C. , & Pilot, A.
    (2005b) Cooperative learning vs. CHC’s collectivism. The analysis in Vietnam. Paper presented atORD conference, Gent, Belgium, 30 May-1 June.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2006) Culturally appropriate pedagogy: the case of group learning in a Confucian Heritage Culture context. Intercultural Education, 17 (1), 1–19. 10.1080/14675980500502172
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980500502172 [Google Scholar]
  40. Phuong, H. Y. , Van den Branden, K. , Van Steendam, E. , & Sercu, L.
    (2015) The impact of PPP and TBLT on Vietnamese students’ writing performance and self-regulatory writing strategies. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166, 37–93. 10.1075/itl.166.1.02yen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.02yen [Google Scholar]
  41. Rao, Z.
    (1996) Reconciling communicative approaches to the teaching of English with traditional Chinese methods. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 458–471.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Richards, J. C. , & Rodgers, T. S.
    (1986) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. A Description and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Saddler, B. , & Graham, S.
    (2005) The effects of peer-assisted sentence combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 43–54. 10.1037/0022‑0663.97.1.43
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.43 [Google Scholar]
  44. Samuda, V. , & Bygate, M.
    (2008) Tasks in second languge learning. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230596429
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sato, R.
    (2010) Reconsidering the effectiveness and suitability of PPP and TBLT in the Japanese EFL classroom. JALT fournal, 32(2), 189–200. 10.37546/JALTJJ32.2‑4
    https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ32.2-4 [Google Scholar]
  46. Samimy, K. K. , & Kobayashi, C.
    (2004) Toward the Development of Intercultural Communicative Competence: Theoretical and Pedagogical Implications for Japanese English Teachers. JALT Journal, 26, (2), 245–261. 10.37546/JALTJJ26.2‑7
    https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ26.2-7 [Google Scholar]
  47. Skehan, P.
    (2003) Task-based instruction. Language teaching, 36 (1), 1–14. 10.1017/S026144480200188X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X [Google Scholar]
  48. Starr, D.
    (2012) China and the Confucian education model. Universitas, 21(1), p.e27.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S.
    (1995) Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. 10.1093/applin/16.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  50. Swain, M.
    (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Thornbury, S.
    (1999) How to teach grammar. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tomlinson, B. , & Bao Dat
    (2004) The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to EFL methodology. Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 199–222. 10.1191/1362168804lr140oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr140oa [Google Scholar]
  53. Tsui, A.
    (1996) Reticence and anxiety in second language teaching. In: K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 145–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Van den Branden, K.
    (2006) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667282
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667282 [Google Scholar]
  55. Van den Branden, K. , Bygate, M. , & Norris, J.
    (2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Van den Branden, K.
    (2016) Task-based language teaching. In G. Hall (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching, 238–252. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Vandergrift, L.
    (2005) Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70–89. 10.1093/applin/amh039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh039 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2011) Second Language Listening: Presage, Process, Product and Pedagogy. In E. Hinkel (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching And Learning, 455–471. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Willis, J. , & Willis, D.
    (1996) Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Wong, H. , & Van Patten, B.
    (2003) The best English: A claim for the superiority of received standard English. Society for Pure English, 39, 603–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Zimmerman, B. J. , & Risemberg, R.
    (1997) Research for the Future. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101. 10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): listening; reading; speaking; Task-based language teaching; writing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error