Volume 161, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Cross-cultural studies (Hofstede, 1984, 1991, 2001; Hall, 1959, 1976) posit that Mexico is a more collectivistic and high context culture than the United States of America and therefore it could be claimed that Mexicans will communicate and perceive professional communication in a different way than US Americans. In contrast, professional communication and social (psychology) studies argue that in order to communicate in a truly intercultural way it is necessary to go beyond the frame of cultural dimensions, since shared professional and educational frameworks could override the impact of cultural differences in professional settings. While empirical evidence so far has shown mixed results, the results of this article provide additional evidence to support the view that the two cited cultural dimensions have been overridden, since the Mexican (N=280) and US American (N=300) student samples showed a rather similar perception of professional dialogues in a monocultural as well as in an intercultural communication setting. A shared framework of knowledge and skills, the impact of the new media and technologies, the virtual and real intercultural encounters between Mexicans and US Americans, their shared educational level, and the fact that nearly all of the Mexican participants reported to speak English as a foreign language and that a majority of the US American participants reported to speak Spanish as a foreign language, could explain, at least for the studied samples, the observed convergence.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Albert, R. D., & Ah Ha, I.
    (2004) Latino/Anglo-American differences in attributions to situations involving touch and silence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 253–280. doi:  10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alred, G. J.
    (1997) Teaching in Germany and the rhetoric of culture. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 353–378. doi:  10.1177/1050651997011003007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651997011003007 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baty, R., & Dold, D.
    (1977) Cross-cultural home stays: An analysis of college students’ responses after living in an unfamiliar culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1(1), 61–76. doi:  10.1016/0147‑1767(77)90007‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(77)90007-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beamer, L.
    (2003) Directness in Chinese business correspondence of the nineteenth century. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, 201–237. doi:  10.1177/1050651902250948
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651902250948 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, A. H., Dillon, W. & Becker, H.
    (1995) German memo and letter style. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9, 219–227. doi:  10.1177/1050651995009002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651995009002004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, J. M.
    (1986) Modes of cross-cultural training: Conceptualizing cross-cultural training as education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 117–134. doi:  10.1016/0147‑1767(86)90002‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90002-7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brislin, R. W.
    (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In C. H. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology. Methodology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2000) Understanding Culture’s Influence on Behavior (2nd edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bond, M. H., & Cheung, T. S.
    (1983) College students’ spontaneous self-concept: the effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 14(2), 153–171. doi:  10.1177/0022002183014002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002183014002002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cardon, P. W.
    (2008) A Critique of Hall’s contexting model. A meta-analysis of literature on intercultural business and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 399–428. doi:  10.1177/1050651908320361
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651908320361 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Conaway, R. N., & Wardrope, W. J.
    (2004) Communication in Latin America: An analysis of Guatemalan business letters. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 465–474. doi:  10.1177/1080569904270986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569904270986 [Google Scholar]
  13. Connor, U. M., Davis, K. W., De Rycker, T., Phillips, E. M., & Verckens, J. P.
    (1997) An international course in international business writing: Belgium, Finland, and the United States. Business Communication Quarterly, 60, 63–74. doi:  10.1177/108056999706000404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999706000404 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dueñas Mur, P.
    (2010) Attitude markers in business management research articles: a cross-cultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 50–72. doi:  10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2009.00228.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00228.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Evia, C.
    (2004) Technical communication learning on the U.S.-Mexico border: Factors affecting cross-cultural competence in globalized settings. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(2), 233–237. doi:  10.1177/1080569904672015
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569904672015 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gudykunst, W., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyeman, S.
    (1996) The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510–543. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1996.tb00377.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Gudykunst, W., & Ting-Toomey, S.
    (1988) Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Pk., CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall, E. T.
    (1959) The silent language. New York: Doubleday & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1976) Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R.
    (1990) Hidden differences. Doing business with the Japanese. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heydenfeldt, J. A. G.
    (2000) The influence of individualism-collectivism on Mexican and US business negotiation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(3), 383–407. doi:  10.1016/S0147‑1767(00)00007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00007-9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofstede, G.
    (1984) Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2010) ITIM. Geert Hofstede™ cultural dimensions. Retrieved on 10 March 2010 from: www.geert-hofstede.com/.
  26. Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L.
    (1961) Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Landis, D., & Wasilewski, J. H.
    (1999) Reflections on 22 years of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations and 23 years in other areas of intercultural practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 535–574. doi:  10.1016/S0147‑1767(99)00009‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00009-7 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewin, K.
    (1936) Some social-psychological differences between the United States and Germany. Character and Personality, 4, 265–293. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑6494.1936.tb02034.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1936.tb02034.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Louhiala-Salminen, L., Charles, M. & Kankaanranta, A.
    (2005) English as a lingua franca in Nordic corporate mergers: Two case companies. English for Specific Purposes, 24(4), 401–421. doi:  10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nunnally, J. C.
    (1976) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller, J. G.
    (1984) Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.46.5.961
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961 [Google Scholar]
  32. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K.
    (1994) Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.67.6.949
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949 [Google Scholar]
  33. Murray-Johnson, L., Witte, K., Liu, W.-Y., & Hubbell, A. P.
    (2001) Addressing cultural orientations in fear appeals: Promoting AIDS-protective behaviors among Mexican immigrant and African American adolescents and American and Taiwanese college students. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 335–358. doi:  10.1080/108107301317140823
    https://doi.org/10.1080/108107301317140823 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ortiz, L. A.
    (2005) Cruzando las fronteras de la comunicación profesional entre México y los Estados Unidos. The emerging hybrid discourse of business communication in a Mexican-U.S. border region. Journal of Business Communication, 42(1), 28–50. doi:  10.1177/0021943604271701
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943604271701 [Google Scholar]
  35. Paulin, M., Ferguson, R. J., & Alvarez Salazar, A. M.
    (1999) External effectiveness of service management. A study of business-to-business relationships in Mexico, Canada and the USA. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10 (5), 409–429. doi:  10.1108/09564239910288950
    https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239910288950 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rubin, R. B., Collado, R. F., & Hernández-Sampieri, R.
    (1992) A cross-cultural examination of interpersonal communication motives in Mexico and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 145–157. doi:  10.1016/0147‑1767(92)90015‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(92)90015-M [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwartz, S. H.
    (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–65). Orlando: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1999) A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47. doi:  10.1111/j.1464‑0597.1999.tb00047.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Schwartz, S. H., & Ros, M.
    (1995) Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 91–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J.
    (1995) Culture, self, and collectivist communication. Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354–389. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1995.tb00351.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00351.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Slater, C. L., Boone, M., Price, L., Martinez, D., Alvarez, I., & Topete, C.
    (2002) A cross-cultural investigation of leadership in the United States and Mexico. School Leadership & Management, 22(2), 197–209. doi:  10.1080/1363243022000007755
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243022000007755 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stevens, B.
    (2000) Russian teaching contracts: An examination of cultural influence and genre. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 38–57. doi:  10.1177/105065190001400102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190001400102 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tebeaux, E.
    (1999) Designing written business communication along the shifting cultural continuum: The new face of Mexico. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13(1), 49–85. doi:  10.1177/105065199901300102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/105065199901300102 [Google Scholar]
  44. Thatcher, B.
    (1999) Cultural and rhetorical adaptations for South American audiences. Technical Communication, 46, 177–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2006) Intercultural rhetoric, technology transfer, and writing in U.S.-Mexico border maquilas. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 383–405. doi:  10.1207/s15427625tcq1503_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1503_6 [Google Scholar]
  46. Thomas, J.
    (1998) Contexting Koreans: Does the high/low model work?Business Communication Quarterly, 61, 9–22. doi:  10.1177/108056999806100403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999806100403 [Google Scholar]
  47. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asian, M., & Lucca, N.
    (1988) Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives of self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–338. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.54.2.323
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323 [Google Scholar]
  48. Trompenaars, F.
    (2000) Riding the waves of culture. Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Uber Grosse, Ch.
    (2001) Mexican managers’ perceptions of cultural competence. Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 334–340. doi:  10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2001.tb02065.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02065.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Varner, I. I.
    (2000) The theoretical foundation for intercultural business communication: A conceptual model. The Journal of Business Communication, 37(1), 39–57. doi:  10.1177/002194360003700102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360003700102 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2001) Teaching intercultural management communication: Where are we? Where do we go?Business Communication Quarterly, 64, 99–111. doi:  10.1177/108056990106400109
    https://doi.org/10.1177/108056990106400109 [Google Scholar]
  52. Würtz, E.
    (2006) Intercultural communication on web sites: A cross-cultural analysis of web sites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 274–299. doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2006.tb00313.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00313.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Yum, J. O.
    (1991) The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationship and communication patterns in East Asia. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication (pp. 78–88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Zaidman, N.
    (2001) Cultural codes and language strategies in business communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 408–441. doi:  10.1177/0893318901143002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318901143002 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error