1887
Volume 162, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper looks at the language used to talk about numerical data and figures as part of in-house, computer-mediated audio-conferencing between managers and their staff in corporate settings. The data consist of a sub-corpus of oral presentations taken from a much larger self-compiled multi-document corpus of business communications. The research is aimed at describing the predominant pragma-linguistic features of these accounts of graphical and numerical data, the most appropriate and effective means of identifying and tracing these, together with the ways participants subjectivize their information and create relevance for their interlocutors, in this specific multi-medial, multi-modal business context. The features focused on include temporal and locational deixis, visual and spatial imagery and the use of time and tense. Findings show that these discourse creation processes play a significant part in the multi-functional character of the presentations, in enacting evaluation, persuasion and the construal of corporate-professional roles and identities. They also reveal something about the nature of virtual professional, communicative space, and the socially-situated creation of corporate-managerial discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.162.02bow
2011-01-01
2019-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bargiela-Chiappini, F.
    (2009) The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C. & Planken, B.
    (2007) Business discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan. doi:  10.1057/9780230627710
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627710 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowker, J.
    (2009) Descriptive processes in business audio-conferencing: Telling the corporate story. In S. Radighieri & P. Tucker (Eds.). Rome: Officina Edizioni (pp. 175–193).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2011a) From Communities of Practice to Communities of Learning: Interdiscursivity in changing corporate priorities”. In P. Gillaerts, E. de Groot, Dieltjens, S., Heynderickx, P. & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Researching discourse in business genres. Cases and corpora. Bern: Peter Lang. (pp 115-138)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2011b) (in press, Amsterdam: John Benjamins). Variation across spoken and written genres in internal corporate communication: multimodality and blending in evolving channels. Proceedings of International Conference, CLAVIER2009, Corpus and Language Variation in English Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy, 5-7 November 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jian, G., Schmisseur, A.M. & Fairhurst, G.T.
    (2008) Organizational discourse and communication: The progeny of Proteus. Discourse & Communication, 2/3, (pp. 299–320). doi:  10.1177/1750481308091912
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481308091912 [Google Scholar]
  7. Langacker, R. W.
    (2001) Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. In M. Pütz, Niemeier, S. & R. Dirven (Eds.) (pp. 3–37).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  9. Levelt, W.J.M.
    1989Speaking: from Intent to Articulation. Cambridge (Mass.): M.IT. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pütz M., Niemeier, S. & Dirven, R.
    (Eds.) (2001) Applied Cognitive Linguistics I, II: Theory and Language Acquisition. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110866247
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866247 [Google Scholar]
  11. Radighieri, S. & Tucker, P.
    (2009) (Eds.), Point of view: Description and evaluation across discourses. Rome: Officina Edizioni.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rayson, P.
    (2003) Wmatrix / USAS, Semantic Annotation System. Lancaster: University of Lancaster, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Talmy, L.
    (1996) Fictive motion in language and “–ception”. In, Bloom, P., Garret, M., Nadel, L. & Peterson, M. (Eds.). Language and Space. Cambridge (Mass.): M.I.T. Press (pp. 211-276).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tucker, P., S. Radighieri, S.
    (Eds.) (2009) Point of View: Description and Evaluation across Discourses. Rome: Officina Edizioni (pp. 175–193).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tyler, A. & Evans, V.
    (2001) The relationship between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: The non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In, Putz, M., Niemeier, S. & R. Dirven (Eds.), Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter (pp. 63–108).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.162.02bow
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error