1887
Volume 163, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of two meaning-oriented communicative tasks on L2 learners’ consolidation of new vocabulary met in a reading text on a familiar topic, building on the premises underlying the Dreyfus and Tsamir (2004) ‘Recognising, Building-with, and Constructing’ (RBC) model. Students in four lower intermediate EFL classes participated in the pre-test (of vocabulary size) post-test experimental study. Some of them only read the new text before taking an immediate and a delayed word retention test (control group); others read the text and afterwards completed comprehension questions (meaning-oriented receptive task). Still others, in addition, wrote a text similar in structure and contents to the input text while using the target words (meaning-oriented productive task). The fourth student group completed all three tasks consecutively. Our results show the superiority of the guided writing task over the ‘reading + comprehension questions’ and the ‘reading only’ conditions. On a theoretical level, content familiarity is shown to be an important mediator variable in early stages of vocabulary processing and consolidation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.163.01liu
2012-01-01
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B.
    (Eds.) (2004) Vocabulary in Second Language. Selection, Acquisition and Testing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chun, D. & Plass, J.
    (1996a) Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modem Language Journal, 80,183–98. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb01159.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x [Google Scholar]
  3. (1996b) Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24, 503–519. doi:  10.1016/S0346‑251X(96)00038‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00038-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Craik, F. & Lockhart, R.
    (1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11,671–684. doi:  10.1016/S0022‑5371(72)80001‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X [Google Scholar]
  5. De Ridder, I.
    (2002) Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading process?, Language Learning & Technology, 6,123–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dreyfus, T. & Tsamir, P.
    (2004) Ben's consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23,271–300. doi:  10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dreyfus, T., Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B.
    (2006) Mechanisms for consolidating knowledge constructs. InNovotná, J., Moraová, H., Krátká, M. & Stehllková, N.(Eds.). 465–472. Prague: PME.
  8. Hershkowitz, R., Hadas, N., Dreyfus, T.
    (2006) Diversity in the construction of a group's shared knowledge. InNovotná, J., Moraová, H., Krátká, M. & Stehllková, N.(Eds.). 297–304. Prague: PME.
  9. Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P.
    (1998) Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11,207–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hulstijn, J.
    (2001) Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning : A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. InP. Robinson(Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.258–286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T.
    (1996) Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80,327–339. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb01614.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01614.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Hulstijn, J. & Laufer, B.
    (2001) Some empirical evidence for the Involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51,539–558. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.00164
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00164 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunt, A. & Beglar, D.
    (2005) A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17,23–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Knight, S.M.
    (1994) Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 295–299. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02043.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02043.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Larson, M. L.
    (1984) Meaning-based translation: A guide to cross-language equivalence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Laufer, B.
    (2003) Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Revies/la Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 59,567–587. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2005) Instructed second language vocabulary learning: The fault in the 'default hypothesis'. InA. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp.311–329). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110197372.2.311
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372.2.311 [Google Scholar]
  18. Laufer, B., & Nation, P.
    (1999) A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16,33–51. doi:  10.1177/026553229901600103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, S.H.
    (2003) ESL Learners' vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction. System, 31, 537–561. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2003.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lomicka, L.
    (1998) To gloss or not to gloss: an investigation of reading comprehension online, Language Learning and Technology, 1,1–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Min, H.
    (2008) EFL Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention: Reading Plus Vocabulary Enhancement Activities and Narrow Reading. Language Learning, 58, 73–115. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00435.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00435.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139524759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar]
  23. Peters, E.
    (2007) Manipulating L2 learners' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning and Technology, 71,36–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Peters, E., Hulstijn, J., Sercu, L., Lutjeharms, M.
    (2009) Learning L2 vocabulary through reading: the effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language Learning, 59,113–151. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00502.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00502.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Pulido, D.
    (2003) Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53,233–284. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9922.00217
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00217 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2007) the effects of topic familiarity and passage sight vocabulary on L2 lexical inferencing and retention through reading. Applied Linguistics, 28,66–86 doi:  10.1093/applin/aml049
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml049 [Google Scholar]
  27. Rott, S.
    (2004) A comparison of output interventions and un-enhanced reading conditions on vocabulary acquisition and text comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des languages vivantes61, 169–202. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.61.2.169
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.2.169 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rott, S., Williams, J., Cameron, R.
    (2004) The effect of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research, 6, 183–222. doi:  10.1191/1362168802lr108oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr108oa [Google Scholar]
  29. Sakar, A. & Ercetin, G.
    (2005) Effectiveness of Hypermedia Annotations for Foreign Language Reading, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 28–38. doi:  10.1111/j.1365‑2729.2005.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Salem, E.B., & Aust, R.
    (2007) The influence of feature-rich computerized glosses on reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. 663–668. Chamonix, France.
  31. Swanborn, M.S.L. & de Glopper, K.
    (1999) Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69,261–285. doi:  10.3102/00346543069003261
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069003261 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S.
    (2000) Reading-Based Exercises in Second Language Vocabulary Learning: An Introspective Study. The Modern Language Journal, 84,196–213. doi:  10.1111/0026‑7902.00062
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00062 [Google Scholar]
  33. Yeh, Y., & Wang, C. W.
    (2003) Effectiveness of vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21, 131–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J.
    (2002) Second language incidental vocabulary retention: the effect of picture and annotation types, CALICO Journal, 20, 33–58.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.163.01liu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error