Volume 163, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study investigated the effect of two meaning-oriented communicative tasks on L2 learners’ consolidation of new vocabulary met in a reading text on a familiar topic, building on the premises underlying the Dreyfus and Tsamir (2004) ‘Recognising, Building-with, and Constructing’ (RBC) model. Students in four lower intermediate EFL classes participated in the pre-test (of vocabulary size) post-test experimental study. Some of them only read the new text before taking an immediate and a delayed word retention test (control group); others read the text and afterwards completed comprehension questions (meaning-oriented receptive task). Still others, in addition, wrote a text similar in structure and contents to the input text while using the target words (meaning-oriented productive task). The fourth student group completed all three tasks consecutively. Our results show the superiority of the guided writing task over the ‘reading + comprehension questions’ and the ‘reading only’ conditions. On a theoretical level, content familiarity is shown to be an important mediator variable in early stages of vocabulary processing and consolidation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barcroft, J. & VanPatten, B.
    (1997) Acoustic salience of grammatical forms: The effect of location, stress and boundedness on Spanish L2 input processing. InA. Perez-Leroux & W. R. Glass(eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Production, processing, and comprehension. Somerville, Ma: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (2002) Frequency in production, comprehension, and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24, 209–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Church, B. A. & Fisher, C.
    (1998) Long-term auditory word priming in preschoolers: Implicit memory support for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language39, 523–542.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, E.V.
    (1993a) The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511554377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554377 [Google Scholar]
  5. Criddle, M.J. & K. Durkin
    (2002) Phonological representation of novel morphemes in children with SLI and typically developing children. Applied Psycholinguistics22, 363–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Beider, E. & V.. Huyge
    (1998) De problemen van kinderen uit niet-Nederlandse en taalgemengde gezinnen in het Nederlandstalige onderwijs in Brussel, InP. Van de Craen(ed.), Brusselse Thema's 3. Mondig Brussel. Brussel: VUBPress.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DeKeyser, R.M.
    (2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition22, 499–533.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Houwer, A. & S.. Gillis
    (1998) Dutch child language: an overview. InA. De Houwer & S. Gillis(eds.), The acquisition of Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/pbns.52.04deh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.52.04deh [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, N.C.
    (1994) Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24, 143–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition27, 305–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, R.
    (2002) Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge?Studies in Second Language Acquisition24,223–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G.
    (2005) The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology22, 455–479.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gass, S.
    (1997) Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gass, S. & Mackey, A.
    (2002) Frequency effects and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24, 249–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerken, L. & Aslin, R.N.
    (2005) Thirty years of research on infant speech perception: the legacy of Peter W. Jusczyk. Language Learning and Development1, 5–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hulstijn, J.H.
    (2002) Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research18, 193–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2002) What does the impact of frequency tell us about the language acquisition device?Studies in Second Language Acquisition24,269–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2005) Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition27, 129–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohnert, K.
    (2002) Picture naming in early sequential bilinguals: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research45, 759–771.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Krashen, S.
    (1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2002) Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24, 275–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J.
    (2001) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics22, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mason, B. & Krashen, S.
    (2004) Is form-focused vocabulary instruction worthwhile?RELC Journal35, 179–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Melka, F.
    (1997) Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. InN. Schmitt & M. McCarthy(eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nation, I.S.P.
    (2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139524759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicoladis, E.
    (2001) Finding first words in the input: Evidence from a bilingual child. In: J. Cenoz & F. Genesee(eds.), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/tilar.1.08nic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.1.08nic [Google Scholar]
  28. Norris, J.M. & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning50, 417–528.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ortega, L.
    (2009) Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rast, R. & Dommergues, J.
    (2003) Towards a characterisation ofsaliency on first exposure to a second language, In EUROSLA Yearbook3 (1). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmidt, R.
    (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics11, 129–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt, W.
    (2001) Attention. InP. Robinson(ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Seidl, A. & Johnson, E.K.
    (2006) Infant word segmentation revised: edge alignment facilitates target extraction. Developmental Science9, 565–573.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Slobin, D.I.
    (1973) Cognitive prerequisites from the development of grammar. InC. Ferguson & D. Slobin(eds.), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Swain, M.
    (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. InS. Gass & C. Madden(eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. InG. Cook & B. Seildholfer(eds.), Principles and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tarone, E.
    (2002) Frequency effects, noticing, and creativity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24, 287–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Truscott, J.
    (1998) Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review. Second Language Research14, 103–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Van den Branden, K.
    (1997) Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning47, 589–636.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. VanPatten, B.
    (2004) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Verhelst, M.
    (2002) De relatie tussen mondeling taalaanbod en woordenschat verwerving van het Nederlands als tweede taal door 2,5-jarige allochtone kleuters in Brussel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Leuven: K.U. Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2004) De relatie tussen kenmerken van de leerder en leersituatie en woordenschatverwerving van het Nederlands als tweede taal door 2,5-jarige allochtone kleuters in Brussel. InA. Housen, M. Pierrard & P. Van de Craen(eds.), Brusselse Thema's 12 - Taal, Attitude en Onderwijs in Brussel. Brussel: VUB Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2005) A box full of feelings: Promoting infants' second language acquisition all day long'. InK.Van den Branden(ed.), Task-based Language Teaching. From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wijnen, F., Kempen, M. & Gillis, S.
    (2001) Roof infinitives in Dutch early child language: an effect of input?Journal of Child Language28, 629–660.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Yu, C., Ballard, D. & Aslin, R.
    (2005) The Role of Embodied Intention in Early Lexical Acquisition. Cognitive Science29,961–1005.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zwaan, R. & Taylor, L.
    (2006) Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology135, 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error