Volume 167, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Ever since the establishment in the 1940’s of the distinguished journal , a significant proportion of research in applied linguistics has defined itself as aiming to address practical problems of language teaching. Given the definition of applied linguistics as ‘the theoretical and empirical study of real world problems in which language has a central role’ (after Brumfit, 2001), an ambition to relate its work to practical language teaching problems is appropriate. Task-based language teaching is a subarea of applied linguistics which deliberately aims to link research to practice. With this in mind, this paper will seek to evaluate the extent to which TBLT research has to date engaged with — and helped address — the real world problems of language education. It then attempts to derive some implications for future directions of TBLT research as a part of an empirical applied linguistics.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, A. , & Lynch, T
    (1988) Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brumfit, C.J
    (2001) Individual freedom in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bygate, M
    (1988) Linguistic and strategic features of the language of learners working in oral communication exercises. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London Institute of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrnes, H. , & Manchon, R
    (Eds.) (2014) Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tblt.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, L.J. , Moon, J.P. , & Bygate, M
    (1996) Language development in the mainstream: How do teachers and pupils use language?Language and Education, 10(4), 221–236. doi: 10.1080/09500789608666710
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789608666710 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis, R
    (1984) Classroom second language development: A study of classroom interaction and language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Foster, P
    (1998) A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Housen, A. , & Kuiken, F
    (Eds.) (2009) Special issue: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency (CAF) in second language acquisition research. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kramsch, C
    (2015) Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv039 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lambert, C
    (2015) A micro-genetic study of task-induced L2 development: The emergence of complexity in L2 descriptive discourse. Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on TBLT . Leuven, Belgium, 16–19 September 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Long, M.H
    (1981) Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics4(2), 126–141. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.413–468). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Long, M. , Adams, L. , McLean, M. , & Castanos, F
    (1976) Doing things with words: Verbal interaction in lockstep and small group classroom situations. In J. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’76 (pp.137–153). Washington, DC: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Long, M. , & Crookes, G
    (1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp.9–54). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lynch, T
    (2001) Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55(2), 124–132. doi: 10.1093/elt/55.2.124
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.124 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61(4), 311–320. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm050 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2009) Responding to learners’ perceptions of feedback: The use of comparators in second language speaking courses. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/17501220802379109
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802379109 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lynch, T. , & Maclean, J
    (2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2001) ‘A case of exercising’: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate , P. Skehan , & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and research (pp.141–162). Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Markee, N
    (2007) Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McDonough, K. , & Mackey, A
    (Eds.) (2013) Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.34 [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller-Hartmann, A. , & Schocker-von Ditfurth, M
    (2011) Teaching English: Task-supported language learning. Paderborn: Schöningh
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Robinson, P
    (2015) The cognition hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing.In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp.87–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tblt.8.04rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.04rob [Google Scholar]
  26. Samuda, V
    (2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate , P. Skehan , & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and research (pp.119–140). Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2015 Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp.271–302). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tblt.8.10sam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.10sam [Google Scholar]
  28. Shintani, N
    (2016) Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tblt.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Shuy, R
    (2015) Applied linguistics past and future. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 434–443. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv016
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv016 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tarone, E
    (2015) Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925–2015 and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 444–453. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv035
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv035 [Google Scholar]
  31. Van den Branden, K
    (Ed.) (2006) Task-based language teaching: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667282
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667282 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2015) Tasks for real! Hold on, how real is ‘real’?. Plenary presentation to the 6th Biennial International Conference on TBLT . Leuven, Belgium, 16-19 September 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Willis, D. , & Willis, J
    (2008) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yule, G
    (1997) Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Yule, G. , & MacDonald, D
    (1990) Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction. The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40(4), 539–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00605.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00605.x [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error