Volume 167, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ariel, M
    (1988) Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 67–87. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011567
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011567 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baek, S
    (2012) Processing of English relative clauses by adult L2 learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bley–Vroman, R
    (1989) What is the logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, 4, 1–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook, V
    (1997) The consequences of bilingualism for cognitive processing. In A.M.B. de Groot & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp.279–299). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Frenck–Mestre, C
    (2002) An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R.R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp.217–236). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/S0166‑4115(02)80012‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(02)80012-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson, E
    (1998) Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00034‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2000) The dependency locality theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita , A.P. Marantz & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp.95–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gordon, P.C. , Hendrick, R. , & Johnson, M
    (2004) Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Guillelmon, D. , & Grosjean, F
    (2001) The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 503–511. doi: 10.3758/BF03196401
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196401 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gundel, J.K
    (1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond , E. Moravczik , & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp.209–239), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.17.16gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.16gun [Google Scholar]
  11. Gundel, J.K , Hedberg, N. , & Zacharski, R
    (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. doi: 10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haendler, Y. , Kliegl, R. , & Adani, F
    (2015) Discourse accessibility constraints in children’s processing of object relative clauses. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1–17. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.61001
    https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.61001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hahne, A. , & Friederici, A.D
    (2001) Processing a second language: Later learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141. doi: 10.1017/S1366728901000232
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000232 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hawkins, R. , & Hattori, H
    (2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22(3), 269–301. doi: 10.1191/0267658306sr269oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr269oa [Google Scholar]
  15. Haznedar, B. , & Schwartz, B.D
    (1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition?In E. Hughes , M. Hughes , & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 1, pp.257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoover, M.L. & Dwivedi, V.D
    (1998) Syntactic processing by skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00031
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00031 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, N
    (2004) Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 603–634. doi: 10.1017/S0142716404001298
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001298 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00397.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Just, M.A. , Carpenter, P.A. , & Woolley, J.D
    (1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.111.2.228
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kronfeld, A
    (1990) Reference and computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, J. & Kim, H
    (2011) The L2 developmental sequence of English constructions and underlying factors. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(3), 577–600. doi: 10.15738/kjell.11.3.201109.577
    https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.11.3.201109.577 [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, R. , & Nicol, J
    (2010) Online processing of anaphora by advanced English learners. In M.T. Prior , Y. Watanabe , & S.-K. Lee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp.150–165). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Omaki, A. , & Schulz, B
    (2011) Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563–588. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000313 [Google Scholar]
  24. Prévost, P. , & White, L
    (2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. doi: 10.1191/026765800677556046
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800677556046 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rah, Y–O
    (2014) Effects of construction-grammar-based instruction on the sentence production ability of Korean college learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Reali, F. , & Christiansen, M.H
    (2007) Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language,57(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  27. Sorace, A
    (2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. doi: 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  28. Sung, M
    (2012) Effects of Instruction on the learning of the English transitive resultative construction by Korean secondary school students. Unpublished MA thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Warren, T. , & Gibson, E
    (2002) The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognitive, 85(1), 79–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Witzel, J. , Witzel, N. , & Nicol, J
    (2012) Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 419–456. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000427
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000427 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error