1887
Volume 167, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives From SLA., Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/itl.167.1.06sav-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.167.1.06sav
2016-09-26
2019-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alanen, R. , Huhta, A. , Martin, M. , Tarnanen, M. , Mäntylä, K. , Kalaja, P. , & Palviainen, Å
    (2012) Designing and assessing L2 writing tasks across CEFR proficiency levels. In M. Torrance , D. Alamargot , M. Castelló , F. Ganier , O. Kruse , A. Mangen , L. Tolchinsky , & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Learning to write effectively: Current trends in European Research (pp.25–221). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. August, G
    (2006) So, what’s behind adult English second language reading?Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 245–264. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2006.10162876
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2006.10162876 [Google Scholar]
  3. Canale, M. , & Swain, M
    (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. doi: 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cui, Y
    (2008) L2 proficiency and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold hypothesis. Paper presented at the Language & Literacy Graduate Student Conference , Victoria, BC, Canada. Retrieved fromhttps://web.uvic.ca/~literacy/UVicLanguageandLiteracy2008ConferenceProceedings/15.L2ProficiencyandL2Reading-ConsolidatingtheLinguisticThresholdHypothesis.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards, J
    (2014) Thinking of the world : Examining the growing popularity of French immersion in the United States. Retrieved frommb.cpf.ca/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/Thinking-Of-The-World-CPF-BC-YK-Report3.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Firth, A. , & Wagner, J
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Graddol, D
    (1997) The future of the English language. The British Council, 1–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Keddle, J.S
    (2004) The CEF and the secondary school syllabus. In K. Morrow (Ed.), Insights from the European framework (pp.43–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kormos, J
    (2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Segalowitz, N
    (2010) Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Siegel, J
    (2003) Social context. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.178–224). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Weir, C.J
    (2005) Limitations of the common European framework for developing comparable examinations and tests. Language Testing, 22(3), 281–300. doi: 10.1191/0265532205lt309oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt309oa [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.167.1.06sav
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error