1887
Volume 168, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examined Persian intermediate and advanced EFL learners’ perceptions regarding (a) their own and their teachers’ responsibility in learning language autonomously; (b) their decision making ability in learning language autonomously; and (c) their autonomous learning activities inside and outside the classroom. To this end, a questionnaire designed by Chan, Spratt, and Humphrey (2002) was distributed among 67 intermediate and 65 advanced EFL learners. Statistical analysis of students’ answers showed that overall, advanced learners tended to assume more responsibility for their own learning, to perceive themselves to be highly capable of autonomous learning, and to practice more autonomous learning activities compared to the intermediate learners. In addition, data collected through the interviews with some of the participants suggested that learners’ perceptions were greatly affected by their previous educational experiences. Since intermediate learners were not largely engaged in making decisions related to educational materials and activities used in their classrooms, they considered themselves as less responsible for and consequently less capable of choosing learning materials and activities. The findings of the study, along with the pedagogical implications, are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.168.1.03jaf
2017-09-22
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdel Razeq, A. A.
    (2014) University EFL learners’ perceptions of their autonomous learning responsibilities and abilities. RELC Journal, 45(3), 321–336. doi: 10.1177/0033688214547035
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214547035 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abednia, A. , & Izadinia, M.
    (2013) Critical pedagogy in ELT classroom: Exploring contributions of critical literacy to learners’ critical consciousness. Language Awareness, 22(4), 338–352. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2012.733400
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.733400 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abraham, R. , & Vann, R.
    (1987) Strategies of two language learners: A case study. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, (pp.85–102). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ablard, K. , & Lipschultz, R.
    (1998) Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: relations to advanced reasoning achievement goals and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 94–101. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.90.1.94
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.94 [Google Scholar]
  5. Atai, M. , & Mazlum, F.
    (2012) English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389–411. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2012.744327
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744327 [Google Scholar]
  6. Benson, P.
    (2000) Autonomy as a learners’ and teachers’ right. Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions. Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 111–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2001) Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2006) Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21–40. doi: 10.1017/S0261444806003958
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2011) What’s new in autonomy. The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Benson, P. , & Voller, P.
    (1997) Autonomy and independence in Language learning. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernat, E. , & Gvozdenko, I.
    (2005) Beliefs about language learning: Current knowledge, pedagogical implications and new research directions. TESL-EJ, 9(1), 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Burkert, A.
    (2011) Introducing aspects of learner autonomy at tertiary level. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 141–150. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2011.577530
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2011.577530 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan, V.
    (2001) Readiness for learner autonomy: what do our learners tell us?Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505–18. doi: 10.1080/13562510120078045
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120078045 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chan, V. , Spratt, M. , & Humphrey, G.
    (2002) Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students’ attitudes and behaviour. Evaluation and Research in Education16(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/09500790208667003
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790208667003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cole, J. , & Vanderplank, R.
    (2016) Comparing autonomous and class-based learners in Brazil: Evidence for the present-day advantages of informal, out-of-class learning. System, 61, 31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cotterall, S.
    (1995) Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23, 195–206. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(95)00008‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00008-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cotterall, S. , & Crabb, D.
    (1999) Fostering autonomy in language classroom: Implications for teacher education. Guidelines, 14, 11–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dafei, D.
    (2007) An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 24 (4), 24–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dickinson, L.
    (1993) Talking shop Aspects of autonomous learning. ELT Journal, 47(4), 330–336. doi: 10.1093/elt/47.4.330
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.4.330 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dörnyei, Z. , & Csizér, K.
    (1998) Ten commandments for motivating language learners: results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2(3), 203–229. doi: 10.1191/136216898668159830
    https://doi.org/10.1191/136216898668159830 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis, R.
    (2008) The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Feryok, A.
    (2013) Teaching for learner autonomy: the teacher’s role and sociocultural theory. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 7(3), 213–225. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2013.836203
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.836203 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsieh, P. , & Kang, H.
    (2010) Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00570.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00570.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Humphreys, G. , & Wyatt, M.
    (2014) Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal, 68(1), 52–61. doi: 10.1093/elt/cct056
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct056 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kalaja, P. , & Barcelos, A. M. F.
    (Eds.) (2003) Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑4751‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0 [Google Scholar]
  26. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2001) Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Little, D.
    (2007) Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. doi: 10.2167/illt040.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0 [Google Scholar]
  28. Littlewood, W.
    (1999) Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71–94. doi: 10.1093/applin/20.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.1.71 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lüftenegger, M. , Schober, B. , Schoot, R. , Wagner, P. , Finsterwald, M. , & Spiel, C.
    (2012) Lifelong learning as a goal: Do autonomy and self-regulation in school result in well prepared pupils?Learning and Instruction, 22, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Macalister, J.
    (2012) Narrative frames and needs analysis. System. 40, 120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2012.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mineishi, M.
    (2010) East Asian EFL learners’ autonomous learning, learner perception on autonomy and portfolio development: in the case of educational contexts in Japan. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(17): 234–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Murphy, L.
    (2008) Supporting learner autonomy: Developing practice through the production of courses for distance learners of French, German and Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 83–102. doi: 10.1177/1362168807084495
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807084495 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nasri, N. , Vahid Dastjerdy, H. , Eslami Rasekh, A. , & Amirian, Z.
    (2015) Iranian EFL teachers’ practices and learner autonomy: Do gender, educational degree, and experience matter?Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gu, Y.
    (2013) Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30. doi: 10.1177/1362168812457528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457528 [Google Scholar]
  35. Oxford, R. L.
    (1990) Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2001) Language learning strategies. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to speakers of other languages (pp.166–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667206.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.025 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2015) Expanded perspectives on autonomous learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 58–71. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2014.995765
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.995765 [Google Scholar]
  38. Palfreyman, D.
    (2003) The representation of learner autonomy in organizational culture. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp.240–253). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Railton, D. , & Watson, P.
    (2005) Teaching autonomy: ‘Reading groups’ and the development of autonomous learning practices. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6, 182–193. doi: 10.1177/1469787405057665
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787405057665 [Google Scholar]
  40. Riazi, A. , & N. Mosalanejad
    (2010) Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian high school and pre-university English textbooks using Bloom’s taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Richards, J. C.
    (2015) The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1177/0033688214561621
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214561621 [Google Scholar]
  42. Riley, P.
    (1996) ‘The blind man and the bubble’: researching self-access. In R. Pemberton , et al. (Eds.) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp.251–64). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rubin, J.
    (1975) What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51. doi: 10.2307/3586011
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011 [Google Scholar]
  44. Saslow, J. & Ascher, A.
    (2012) Top notch series. Longman: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmenk, B.
    (2006) CALL, self-access and learner autonomy: A linear process from heteronomy to autonomy?In A. W. T. Harden (Ed.), The concept of progression in the teaching and learning of foreign languages (pp.75–85). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schunk, D.
    (1984) Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48–58. doi: 10.1080/00461528409529281
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529281 [Google Scholar]
  47. Spratt, M. , Humphreys, G. , & Chan, V.
    (2002) Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first?Language Teaching Research, 6 (3), 245–266. doi: 10.1191/1362168802lr106oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr106oa [Google Scholar]
  48. Ushioda, E.
    (1996) Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. Dublin: Authentik.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2003) Motivation as a socially mediated process. In D. Little , J. Ridley , & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment (pp.90–102). Dublin: Authentik.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Victori, M. , & Lockhart, W.
    (1995) Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23, 223–234. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(95)00010‑H
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00010-H [Google Scholar]
  51. White, C.
    (2008) Beliefs and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.). Lessons from good language learners (pp.19–34). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Williams, M. , & Burden, R. L.
    (1999) Student’s developing conceptions of themselves as language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 193–201. doi: 10.1111/0026‑7902.00015
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00015 [Google Scholar]
  53. Williams, M. , Burden, R. , Poulet, G. , & Maun, I.
    (2004) Learners’ perceptions of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 30, 19–29. doi: 10.1080/09571730485200191
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730485200191 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.168.1.03jaf
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.168.1.03jaf
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): autonomous activities , decision making ability , learner autonomy and learner responsibility
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error