Volume 170, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study investigated the effects that different types of instruction varying in explicitness had on 88 intermediate-level Spanish learners’ development of the imperfect subjunctive on a reading task. Participants were randomly assigned to one of 3 experimental conditions that differed in their degree of instructional explicitness (+/− deductive). One condition (+Deductive) received a detailed grammar explanation prior to task; a second condition (−Deductive) received a hint about a new target form present in the reading task, and the third condition (Baseline) was not presented with any grammar information or hint. The study consisted of 3 sessions, following a pre/post/delayed computerized test design with 2 weeks between sessions. Results showed that the −Deductive condition performed as well as the +Deductive condition immediately and 2 weeks after treatment for both Interpretation and Controlled production tests.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adrada-Rafael
    (2017) Processing the Spanish imperfect subjunctive: Depth of processing under different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(2), 477–508. 10.1017/S0142716416000308
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000308 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alanen, R.
    (1995) Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. InR. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp.259–302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andringa, S., De Glopper, K., & Hacquebord, H.
    (2011) Effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance. Language Learning, 61(3), 868–903. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00623.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00623.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Benati, A.
    (2004) The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. InB. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, 207–225. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Leow, R.
    (2016) The effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish gustar structures: An analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265–291. 10.1017/S0272263116000139
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000139 [Google Scholar]
  6. Collentine, J.
    (1995) The development of complex syntax and mood selection abilities by intermediate-level learners of Spanish. Hispania, 78, 122–135. 10.2307/345232
    https://doi.org/10.2307/345232 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cox, J.
    (2017) Explicit instruction, bilingualism, and the older adult learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 29–58. 10.1017/S0272263115000364
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000364 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cox, J. G., & Sanz, C.
    (2015) Deconstructing PI for the ages: Explicit instruction v. practice in young and older bilinguals. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53, 225–248. 10.1515/iral‑2015‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0011 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Graaff, R., & Housen, A.
    (2009) Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. InM. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp.726–755). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch38
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch38 [Google Scholar]
  10. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (1995) Learning second language grammar rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(03), 379–410. 10.1017/S027226310001425X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310001425X [Google Scholar]
  11. Dominicis, M. C., & Reynolds, J. J.
    (2011) Repase y escriba: Curso avanzado de gramática y composición (6th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Doughty, C. J.
    (1991) Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469. 10.1017/S0272263100010287
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010287 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    (1991) Grammar teaching practice or consciousness-raising?InR. Ellis (Ed.), Second language acquisition and second language pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Erlam, R.
    (2003) The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. Modern Language Journal87, 242–60. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00188
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00188 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171. 10.1191/1362168805lr161oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr161oa [Google Scholar]
  16. Farley, A.
    (2004) The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. InB. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp.143–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fernández, C.
    (2008) Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,30, 277–305. 10.1017/S0272263108080467
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080467 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M.
    (2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. InP. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.443–482). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenslade, T. A., Bouden, L., & Sanz, C.
    (1999) Attending to form and content in processing L2 reading texts. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 65–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Herron, C., & Tomasello, M.
    (1992) Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. French Review, 65, 708–718.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hsieh, C. H., Moreno, N., & Leow, R. P.
    (2016) Awareness, type of medium, and L2 development: Revisiting Hsieh (2008). InR. Leow, L. Cerezo, & M. Baralt (Eds.), A psycholinguistic approach to technology and language learning (pp.131–150). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2005) Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129–140. 10.1017/S0272263105050084
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050084 [Google Scholar]
  23. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Leow, R. P., Hsieh, H. C., & Moreno, N.
    (2008) Attention to form and meaning revisited. Language Learning, 58(3), 665–695. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00453.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00453.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Leow, R. P.
    (2012) Explicit and implicit learning in the L2 classroom: What does the research suggest?The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and Tefl, 2, 117–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Leow, R. P., & Mercer, J. D.
    (2015) Depth of processing in L2 learning: Theory, research, and pedagogy. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–14. 10.1080/23247797.2015.1026644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2015.1026644 [Google Scholar]
  27. Long, M. H.
    (1988) Instructed interlanguage development. InL. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp.115–141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1993) Grammar and task-based learning. InG. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  30. Robinson, P.
    (1996) Consciousness, rules, and instructed second language acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1997) Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223–247. 10.1017/S0272263197002052
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002052 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P.
    (2004a) Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 192–216. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.00225.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00225.x [Google Scholar]
  33. (2004b) Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269–292. 10.1017/S0142716404001134
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001134 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rosa, E. M., & O’Neill, M.
    (1999) Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511–556. 10.1017/S0272263199004015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004015 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K.
    (2004) Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35–78. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00248.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x [Google Scholar]
  36. (2005) Explicitness in pedagogical interventions: Input, practice, and feedback. InC. Sanz (Ed.), Mind & Context in adult second language acquisition (pp.234–263). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanz, C., Lin, H., Lado, B., Stafford, C., & Bowden, H.
    (2014) One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in Ab Initio language development. Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shaffer, C.
    (1989) A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 73,395–403. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1989.tb05319.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05319.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
    (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00562.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Stafford, C., Bowden, H. W., & Sanz, C.
    (2012) Optimizing language instruction: Matters of explicitness, practice and cue learning. Language Learning, 62(3), 741–768. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00648.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00648.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Tagarelli, K. M., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P.
    (2015) Working memory, learning conditions, and the acquisition of L2 syntax. InW. Zhisheng, M. Borges Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theory, research and commentary. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783093595‑017
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-017 [Google Scholar]
  42. Timberlake, A.
    (2007) Aspect, tense, mood. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 3, Grammatical categories and the lexicon (2nd ed., pp.280–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.005 [Google Scholar]
  43. VanPatten, B.
    (1996) Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Wong, W.
    (2004) Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. InB. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp.187–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error