1887
image of The effect of task repetition on the patterns of interaction of ESL children
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Research on collaborative work has explored the benefits of task repetition (TR) for L2 development. TR has been claimed to improve L2 complexity, accuracy and fluency, provide opportunities for feedback, and increase learners’ engagement in their L2, as reported in studies that have explored patterns of interaction. Research on this topic, particularly that undertaken with EFL children as participants, has gained attention in recent years. However, there is a dearth of literature regarding the impact of TR on the patterns of interaction and on the opportunities to receive feedback for child ESL learners. The aim of the present study is to address this gap examining the interactions of 28 young ESL learners who completed the same spot-the-difference task twice within a 3-month time frame. The findings showed that the majority of pairs represented patterns of interaction with low levels of mutuality (i.e. engagement) and upon TR these patterns barely varied. However, regardless of learners’ patterns of interaction, these ESL learners provided feedback and negotiated during task-based interaction, especially the collaborative pairs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.17034.azk
2019-06-21
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmadian, M. J.
    2011 The Effect of ‘Massed’ Task Repetitions on Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Does it Transfer to a New Task?The Language Learning Journal39 (3): 269–280. 10.1080/09571736.2010.545239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2010.545239 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2012 Task Repetition in ELT. ELT Journal66 (3): 380–382. 10.1093/elt/ccs020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs020 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmadian, M. J., and M. Tavakoli
    2011 The Effects of Simultaneous Use of Careful Online Planning and Task Repetition on Accuracy, Complexity, and Fluency in EFL Learners’ Oral Production. Language Teaching Research15: 35–59. 10.1177/1362168810383329
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 [Google Scholar]
  4. Azkarai, A., and M. P. García Mayo
    2017 Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research21 (4): 480–495. 10.1177/1362168816654169
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654169 [Google Scholar]
  5. Azkarai, A., and R. Oliver
    2019 Negative feedback on task repetition: ESL vs. EFL child settings. The Language Learning Journal47 (3): 269–280. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1196385
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1196385 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bret Blasco, A.
    2014 L2 English young learners’ oral production skills in CLIL and EFL settings: A longitudinal study. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
  7. Brooks, L., and R. Donato
    2009 Languaging in Collaborative Writing: Creation of and Response to Expertise. InMultiple Perspectives on Interaction. Second Language Research in honor of Susan M. Gass, edited byMackey, A., and C. Polio, 58–89. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, Y. G., and W. Zeng
    2015 Young Foreign Language Learners’ Interactional Development in Task-based Paired Assessment in their First and Foreign Languages: A Case of English Learners in China. Education 3–1343: 292–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bygate, M.
    1996 Effects of Task Repetition: Appraising the Developing Language of Learners. InChallenge and Change in Language Teaching, edited byWillis, J. and D. Willis (136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2001 Effects of Task Repetition on the Structure and Control of Oral Language. InTask-based Learning: Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, edited byBygate, M., Skehan, P., and M. Swain (23–48). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bygate, M., and V. Samuda
    2005 Integrative Planning Through the Use of Task Repetition. InPlanning and Task Performance in Second Language, edited byR. Ellis (37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.05byg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.05byg [Google Scholar]
  12. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    2011 Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics31, 182–204. 10.1017/S0267190511000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    2003Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016 Focus on Form: A Critical Review. Language Teaching Research20 (3), 405–428. 10.1177/1362168816628627
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816628627 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fukuta, J.
    2016 Effects of Task Repetition on Learners’ Attention Orientation in L2 Oral Production. Language Teaching Research20 (3), 321–340. 10.1177/1362168815570142
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815570142 [Google Scholar]
  16. García Mayo, M. P., and A. Azkarai
    2016 EFL task-based interaction. Does task modality impact on language-related episodes?InPeer interaction and second language learning: pedagogical potential and research agenda, edited byM. Sato, and S. Ballinger (241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.45.10gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.10gar [Google Scholar]
  17. García Mayo, M. P., and A. Imaz Agirre
    2016 Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal44, 451–466. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799 [Google Scholar]
  18. García Mayo, M. P., A. Imaz Agirre and A. Azkarai
    2017 Task repetition effects on CAF in EFL child task-based oral interaction. InRecent Perspectives on Task-based Language Learning and Teaching, edited byM. Ahmadian, and M. P. García Mayo (11–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501503399‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503399-002 [Google Scholar]
  19. García Mayo, M. P. and M. L. García Lecumberri
    2003Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596407
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596407 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jarred, A., and N. Roelofs
    2003Developing Oral Language with Barrier Games. Bentley, WA: Hands on Concepts.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, Y., and N. Tracy-Ventura
    2013 The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System41: 829–840. 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lantolf, J. P.
    2000 Second Language Learning as a Mediated Process. Language Teaching33, 79–96. 10.1017/S0261444800015329
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800015329 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lázaro Ibarrola, A., and R. Azpilicueta Martínez
    2015 Investigating Negotiation of Meaning in EFL Children with Very Low Levels of Proficiency. International Journal of English Studies15 (1): 1–21. 10.6018/ijes/2015/1/203751
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2015/1/203751 [Google Scholar]
  24. Long, M.
    1996 The Role of Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. InHandbook of Research on Language Acquisition, edited byRitchie, W. C., and T. Bhatia (413–468). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lyster, R., and L. Ranta
    1997 Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition19 (1), 37–66. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mackey, A., A. P. Kanganas and R. Oliver
    2007 Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly41 (2), 285–312. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00060.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00060.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Oliver, R.
    1995 Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition17, 459–481. 10.1017/S0272263100014418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014418 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1998 Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal82 (3), 372–386. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01215.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01215.x [Google Scholar]
  29. 2002 The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal86 (1), 97–111. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00138
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00138 [Google Scholar]
  30. Oliver, R., and A. Azkarai.
    2019 Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners: What is the impact of proficiency and task type?Language Teaching for Young Learners1 (1), 82–102. 10.1075/ltyl.00006.oli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00006.oli [Google Scholar]
  31. Patanasorn, C.
    2010 Effects of Procedural Content and Task Repetition on Accuracy and Fluency in an EFL Context. PhD Dissertation. Northern Arizona University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Philp, J., R. Oliver, and A. Mackey
    2008Second Language Acquisition and the Younger Learner. Child’s Play?Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.23 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pica, T., R. Kanagy, and F. Falodun
    1993 Choosing and Using Communication Tasks for Second Language Instruction and Research. InTasks and Language Learning, edited byCrookes, G. and S. M. Gass (9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pinter, A.
    2007 Some Benefits of Peer-peer Interaction: 10-year-old Children Practising with a Communication Task. Language Teaching Research11: 189–207. 10.1177/1362168807074604
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074604 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rouhshad, A., and N. Storch
    2016 A Focus on Mode. Patterns of Interaction in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Contexts. InPeer Interaction and Second Language Learning. Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda, edited bySato, M., and S. Ballinger (267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.45.11rou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.11rou [Google Scholar]
  36. Sample, E., and M. Michel
    2014 An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency in young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal31: 23–46. 10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185 [Google Scholar]
  37. Shintani, N.
    2012 Repeating Input-based Tasks with Young Beginner Learners. RELC Journal43 (1): 39–51. 10.1177/0033688212439322
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439322 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014 Using Tasks with Young Beginner Learners: The Role of the Teacher. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching8 (3): 279–294. 10.1080/17501229.2013.861466
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.861466 [Google Scholar]
  39. Storch, N.
    2002 Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work. Language Learning5: 119–158. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2009The Nature of Pair Interaction: Learners’ Interaction in an ESL Class: Its Nature and Impact on Grammatical Development. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Swain, M.
    2000 The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition Through Collaborative Dialogue. InSociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, edited byLantolf, J. (97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2006 Languaging, Agency and Collaboration in Advanced Second Language Learning. InH. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky, edited byByrnes, H. (95–108). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tan, L., G. Wigglesworth and N. Storch
    2010 Pair Interaction and Mode of Communication: Comparing Face-to-Face and Computer Mediated Communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics33: 1–27. 10.2104/aral1027
    https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1027 [Google Scholar]
  44. Vygotsky, L. S.
    1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Watanabe, Y., and M. Swain
    2007 Effects of Proficiency Differences and Patterns of Pair Interaction on Second Language Learning: Collaborative Dialogue Between Adult ESL Learners. Language Teaching Research11 (2): 121–142. 10.1177/136216880607074599
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.17034.azk
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.17034.azk
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: task repetition; patterns of interaction; ESL; young learners
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error