Volume 170, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study examines the impact of task repetition on second language learners’ task performance and the mediating role of teacher feedback and learner self-assessment on oral performance. The study was conducted in a university-based English for Academic Purposes (EAP) program, where, as part of a course, intermediate proficiency learners ( = 52) were tasked with preparing and delivering a technology-mediated oral presentation (i.e., task) on a topic of their choice. First, they presented the task to the whole-class, reflected on their performance in terms of language and format quality, and received teacher’s feedback. Four weeks later, they produced a second recording and reflected on it again. A comparison group ( = 26) also delivered a presentation before a class but did it once, without reflection or teacher feedback. Both groups used technology to prepare, deliver, and document their presentations. The recordings were rated on six rubric-determined traits by the teacher and an independent rater, and the scores were compared between groups. To determine the effects of self-assessment, coupled with teacher feedback, on task repetition, learners’ written reflections and teacher’s comments were analyzed using discourse coding techniques. The results revealed benefits for task repetition and self-assessment during the performance of the same task for the experimental group, confirming the importance of task repetition in EAP contexts and the need for continuous and teacher-supported learner self-assessment in learner task performance and outcome.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ahmadian, M. J.
    (2011) The effect of ‘massed’ task repetitions on complexity, accuracy and fluency: does it transfer to a new task?, The Language Learning Journal, 39(3), 269–280. 10.1080/09571736.2010.545239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2010.545239 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2012) Task repetition in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(3), 380–382. 10.1093/elt/ccs020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs020 [Google Scholar]
  3. Airaisian, P. W.
    (1997) Classroom assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S.
    (1989) The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability. Language Testing, 6, 14–25. 10.1177/026553228900600104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600104 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baleghizadeh, S. & Derakhshesh, A.
    (2012) The effect of task repetition and noticing on EFL learners’ oral output. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 141–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blue, G.
    (1994) Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Does it work?CLE Working Papers, 3, 18–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bygate, M.
    (1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. InJ. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp.136–146). Oxford, UK: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1999) Task as the context for the framing, re-framing and unframing of language. System, 27, 33–48. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(98)00048‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2001) “Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language”. InM. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks. Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (pp.23–48). Harlow, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2006) Areas of work that influence L2 speaking instruction. InE. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp.159–186). Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter. 10.1515/9783110197778.3.159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197778.3.159 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2018) Introduction. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.intro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.intro [Google Scholar]
  13. Chapelle, C. A. & Brindley, G.
    (2010) Assessment. InN. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp.247–267). London, UK: Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, Y.-M.
    (2006) Peer and self-assessment for English oral performance: A study of reliability and learning benefits. English Teaching and Learning, 30(4), 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2008) Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 235–262. 10.1177/1362168807086293
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086293 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cram, B.
    (1995) Self-assessment: from theory to practice. Developing a workshop guide for teachers. InBrindley, G. (Ed.). Language Assessment in Action (pp.271–305). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (1998) Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. InC. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.42–63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2007) Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. InR. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.1–18). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dörnyei, Z. & Ryan, S.
    (2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315779553
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553 [Google Scholar]
  20. Egbert, J.
    (2005) CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. 10.1093/applin/amp042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2015) Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Falchichov, N.
    (1986) Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146–165. 10.1080/0260293860110206
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293860110206 [Google Scholar]
  25. Forgas, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M.
    (2009) The psychology of self-regulation: An introductory review. InJ. P. Forgas, R. F. Baumeister, & D. M. Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp.1–17). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Foster, P. & Skehan, P.
    (1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. 10.1017/S0272263100015047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047 [Google Scholar]
  27. Frawley, W. & Lantolf, J.
    (1985) Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 19–44. 10.1093/applin/6.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-Garcia, M.
    (1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549–581. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00102
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00102 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gonzalez-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L.
    (2014) Towards technology-mediated TBLT: An introduction. InM. Gonzalez-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp.1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H.
    (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. 10.3102/003465430298487
    https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hawkes, M. L.
    (2012) Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus to form. ELT Journal, 66(3), 327–336. 10.1093/elt/ccr059
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr059 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hyland, K. & Shaw, P.
    (2016) Introduction. InK. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp.1–13). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315657455
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657455 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, Y. & Tracy-Ventura, N.
    (2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System, 41, 829–841. 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A.
    (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. 10.1037/0033‑2909.119.2.254
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kulhavy, R. W.
    (1977) Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 211–232. 10.3102/00346543047002211
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002211 [Google Scholar]
  36. Larson-Freeman, D.
    (2003) Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2006) Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end and there is no state. InZ.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp.189–200). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2018) Task repetition or task iteration? It does make a difference. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.311–329). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.12lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.12lar [Google Scholar]
  39. Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L.
    (2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Levelt, W.
    (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Levy, M.
    (2009) Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00972.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Littlewood, W.
    (1999) Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71–94. 10.1093/applin/20.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.1.71 [Google Scholar]
  43. Long, M.
    (2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lynch, T.
    (2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61(4), 311–320. 10.1093/elt/ccm050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm050 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2018) Perform, reflect, recycle: Enhancing task repetition in second language speaking classes. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.193–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.08lyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.08lyn [Google Scholar]
  46. Lynch, T. & Anderson, K.
    (1992) Study speaking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lynch, T. & Maclean, J.
    (2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250. 10.1177/136216880000400303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400303 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mennim, P.
    (2003) Rehearsed oral output and reactive focus on form. ELT Journal, 57(2), 130–138. 10.1093/elt/57.2.130
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.2.130 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2012) Learner negotiation of L2 form in transcription exercises. ELT Journal, 66(1), 52–61. 10.1093/elt/ccr018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr018 [Google Scholar]
  50. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K.
    (1997) A study in self-assessment: Tutor and students’ perception of performance criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 357–369. 10.1080/0260293970220401
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293970220401 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2000) The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23–38. 10.1080/02602930050025006
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050025006 [Google Scholar]
  52. Oskarsson, M.
    (1989) Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6(1), 1–13. 10.1177/026553228900600103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600103 [Google Scholar]
  53. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17, 368–392. 10.1177/026765830101700405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830101700405 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2007) Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. InR. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.256–286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.015 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2011) Task-based language learning: A review of the issues. Language Learning, 61, 1–36. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00641.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Saldaña, J.
    (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London; Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sheppard, C. & Ellis, R.
    (2018) The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the repeated performance of the same task and on a new task of the same type. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.171–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.07she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.07she [Google Scholar]
  58. Skehan, P.
    (1989) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532. 10.1093/applin/amp047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
  60. Skehan, P. & Foster, P.
    (1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00071
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071 [Google Scholar]
  61. Stiggins, R. J.
    (2001) Student-involved classroom assessment (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Storch, N., Morton, J., & Thompson, C.
    (2016) EAP pedagogy in undergraduate contexts. InK. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp.477–488). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Taras, M.
    (2001) The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for students and for tutors. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 289–306. 10.1080/02602930120093922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120093922 [Google Scholar]
  64. (2003) To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 549–565. 10.1080/02602930301678
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301678 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tavakoli, P. & Foster, P.
    (2011) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 61, 37–72. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00642.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00642.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Walker, A. & White, G.
    (2013) Technology enhanced language learning: Connecting theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Wigglesworth, G.
    (1993) Exploring bias analysis as a tool for improving rater consistency in assessing oral interaction. Language Testing, 10, 305–335. 10.1177/026553229301000306
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000306 [Google Scholar]
  68. Winke, P.
    (2014) Formative, task-based oral assessments in an advanced Chinese-language class. InM. Gonzalez-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp.263–293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Zeidner, M., Boerkaerts, M. & Pintrich, P. R.
    (2000) Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. InM. Boerkaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.749–768). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012109890‑2/50052‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50052-4 [Google Scholar]
  70. Zimmerman, B. J.
    (2001) Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and achievement (2nd ed.). InB. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp.1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): English for academic purposes; feedback; self-assessment; task repetition; technology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error