Volume 172, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study investigated variation in receptive L2 English vocabulary among Norwegian university students in relation to their field of study and exposure to English, both within and outside of formal education. A survey comprising the Vocabulary Levels Test (Schmitt, Schmitt, & Clapham, 2001) and questions about sources of language acquisition was completed by 189 Norwegian university students. The results indicate that vocabulary knowledge varied between students whose courses required different amounts of English reading. Extramural exposure to English was found to be a stronger predictor of vocabulary scores than formal English education. Since vocabulary knowledge is an important predictor of reading comprehension, it is important to consider how much the observed variation in vocabulary knowledge might affect academic outcomes.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Arnbjörnsdóttir, B.
    (2018) Using English at university. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Language development across the life span: The impact of English on education and work in Iceland (pp.143–162). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑67804‑7_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67804-7_8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnsby, E. S.
    (2013) How do Norwegian beginner students experience the reading of English course material at university? A mixed-methods study. (Master’s thesis), University of Oslo, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beglar, D. , & Nation, P.
    (2007) A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamini, Y. , & Hochberg, Y.
    (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonnet, G.
    (2004) The assessment of pupil’s skills in English in eight European countries 2002. InParis: The European network of policy makers for the evaluation of educational systems.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brevik, L. M.
    (2016) The gaming outliers. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Educational technology and polycontextual bridging (pp.39–61). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑6300‑645‑3_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-645-3_3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brevik, L. M. , & Hellekjær, G. O.
    (2018) Outliers: Upper secondary school students who read better in the L2 than in L1. International Journal of Educational Research, 89, 80–91. 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brevik, L. M. , Olsen, R. V. , & Hellekjær, G. O.
    (2016) The complexity of second language reading: Investigating the L1-L2 relationship. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 161–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brock-Utne, B.
    (2001) The Growth of English for Academic Communication in the Nordic Countries. International Review of Education, 47(3/4), 221–233. 10.1023/A:1017941523866
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017941523866 [Google Scholar]
  10. Busby, N. L.
    (2018) Comparing first and second language reading: the use of metacognitive strategies among Norwegian students. Acta Didactica Norge, 12(2), 1–26. 10.5617/adno.5579
    https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.5579 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cobb, T.
    (2007) Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 38–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Coxhead, A.
    (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. 10.2307/3587951
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951 [Google Scholar]
  13. Coxhead, A. , & Bytheway, J.
    (2015) Learning vocabulary using two massive online resources: You will not blink. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp.65–74). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Daller, M. H. , & Phelan, D.
    (2013) Predicting international student study success. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 173–193. 10.1515/applirev‑2013‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
  15. Day, R. R. , Omura, C. , & Hiramatsu, M.
    (1991) Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7(2), 541–551.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Edgarsson, G.
    (2018) Academic vocabulary proficiency and reading comprehension among Icelandic secondary school students. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Language development across the life span: The impact of English on education and work in Iceland (pp.95–112). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑67804‑7_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67804-7_6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Education First
    Education First (2019) English Proficiency Index. Retrieved fromwww.ef.no/epi/regions/europe/norway/
  18. Fernández, B. G. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2015) How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94–126. 10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
  19. Field, A. , Miles, J. , & Field, Z.
    (2012) Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gardner, D. , & Davies, M.
    (2013) A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327. 10.1093/applin/amt015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015 [Google Scholar]
  21. González Fernández, B. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2015) How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94–126. 10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
  22. Grabe, W.
    (1988) Reassessing the term “interactive.”. In P. L. Carell , J. Devine , & D. E. Esky (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp.56–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524513.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524513.008 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2009) Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Graddol, D.
    (2006) English next: Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a foreign language’. London: British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gyllstad, H. , Vilkaitė, L. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2015) Assessing vocabulary size through multiple-choice formats: Issues with guessing and sampling rates. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(2), 278–306. 10.1075/itl.166.2.04gyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.2.04gyl [Google Scholar]
  26. Harrington, M.
    (2018) Lexical Facility. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37262‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37262-8 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hazenberg, S. , & Hulstijn, J. H.
    (1996) Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 145–163. 10.1093/applin/17.2.145
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.2.145 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hellekjær, G. O.
    (2005) The acid test: Does upper secondary EFL instruction effectively prepare Norwegian students for the reading of English textbooks at colleges and universities. (PhD thesis), University of Oslo, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2008) A case for improved reading instruction for academic English reading proficiency. Acta Didactica Norge, 2(1), 1–17. 10.5617/adno.1022
    https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.1022 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2009) Academic English reading proficiency at the university level: A Norwegian case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 198–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2010) Lecture Comprehension in English-Medium Higher Education. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 45, 11–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2012) Fra Reform 94 til Kunnskapsløftet: En sammenligning av leseferdigheter på engelsk blant avgangselever i den videregående skolen i 2002 og 2011. In T. N. Hopfenbeck , M. Kjærnsli , & R. V. Olsen (Eds.), Kvalitet i norsk skole (pp.153–171). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Henriksen, B. , Albrechtsen, D. , & Haastrup, K.
    (2004) The relationship between vocabulary size and reading comprehension in the L2. In D. Albrechtsen , K. Haastrup , & B. Henriksen (Eds.), Angles on the English-speaking World (Vol.4, pp.129–140). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Horst, M. , Cobb, T. , & Meara, P.
    (1998) Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hu, M. H.-C. , & Nation, P.
    (2000) Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hultgren, A. K. , Gregersen, F. , & Thøgersen, J.
    (2014) English in Nordic universities: Ideologies and practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jeeves, A.
    (2018) Perceptions of relevance of English education at secondary school. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Language development across the life span: The impact of English on education and work in Iceland (pp.113–141). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑67804‑7_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67804-7_7 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jóhannsdóttir, Á.
    (2018) English exposure and vocabulary proficiency at the onset of English instruction. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Language development across the life span: The impact of English on education and work in Iceland (pp.57–78). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑67804‑7_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67804-7_4 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kremmel, B. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2018) Vocabulary levels test. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp.1–7). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Laufer, B.
    (1989) What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension?In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp.316–323). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1992) Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with the reader’s general academic ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 15(2), 95–103. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.1992.tb00025.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1992.tb00025.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Laufer, B. , & Paribakht, T. S.
    (1998) The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48(3), 365–391. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00046 [Google Scholar]
  43. Laufer, B. , & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C.
    (2010) Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Laufer, B. , & Sim, D. D.
    (1985) Measuring and explaining the reading threshold needed for English for academic purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals, 18(5), 405–411. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1985.tb00973.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1985.tb00973.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, L. , & MacGregor, L. J.
    (2010) Investigating the receptive vocabulary size of university-level Chinese learners of English: How suitable is the Vocabulary Levels Test?Language and Education, 24(3), 239–249. 10.1080/09500781003642478
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500781003642478 [Google Scholar]
  46. Malmström, H. , Pecorari, D. , & Shaw, P.
    (2018) Words for what? Contrasting university students’ receptive and productive academic vocabulary needs. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 28–39. 10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Milton, J. , & Treffers-Daller, J.
    (2013) Vocabulary size revisited: the link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 151–172. 10.1515/applirev‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nation, I. S. P.
    (1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2013) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139858656
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2015) Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 136–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Pecorari, D. , Shaw, P. , Irvine, A. , & Malmström, H.
    (2011) English for academic purposes at Swedish universities: Teachers’ objectives and practices. Ibérica, 22, 55–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pecorari, D. , Shaw, P. , Irvine, A. , Malmström, H. , & Mežek, Š.
    (2012) Reading in tertiary education: Undergraduate student practices and attitudes. Quality in Higher Education, 18(2), 235–256. 10.1080/13538322.2012.706464
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.706464 [Google Scholar]
  54. Peters, E.
    (2018) The effect of out-of-class exposure to English language media on learners’ vocabulary knowledge. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 142–168. 10.1075/itl.00010.pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00010.pet [Google Scholar]
  55. Peters, E. , Noreillie, A. S. , Heylen, K. , Bulté, B. , & Desmet, P.
    (2019) The Impact of Instruction and Out-of-School Exposure to Foreign Language Input on Learners’ Vocabulary Knowledge in Two Languages. Language Learning, 69(3), 747–782. 10.1111/lang.12351
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12351 [Google Scholar]
  56. Peters, E. , & Webb, S.
    (2018) Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 551–577. 10.1017/S0272263117000407
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000407 [Google Scholar]
  57. Puimège, E. , & Peters, E.
    (2019) Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: an exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. The Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 424–438. 10.1080/09571736.2019.1638630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1638630 [Google Scholar]
  58. Qian, D.
    (1999) Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282–308. 10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282 [Google Scholar]
  59. Saragi, T. , Nation, I. S. P. , & Meister, G. F.
    (1978) Vocabulary learning and reading. System, 6(2), 72–78. 10.1016/0346‑251X(78)90027‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(78)90027-1 [Google Scholar]
  60. Schmitt, N. , Jiang, X. , & Grabe, W.
    (2011) The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01146.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x [Google Scholar]
  61. Schmitt, N. , & Meara, P.
    (1997) Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 17–36. 10.1017/S0272263197001022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schmitt, N. , Schmitt, D. , & Clapham, C.
    (2001) Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88. 10.1177/026553220101800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schwach, V. , & Dalseng, C. F.
    (2011) Språk i pensumlitteratur. Bruk av norsk og engelsk i første år på grunnivå i høyere utdanning: Fysikk, historie, informatikk, sosiologi og sykepleie (Vol.9). Oslo: NIFU.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Shaw, P. , & McMillion, A.
    (2011) Components of success in academic reading tasks for Swedish students. Ibérica, 22, 141–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Skjelde, K. M.
    (2015) Academic vocabulary unleashed potential? A corpus study of English course materials for advanced Norwegian learners of English. (Master’s thesis), University of Bergen, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sletten, M. A. , Strandbu, Å. , & Gilje, Ø.
    (2015) Idrett, dataspilling og skole – konkurrerende eller «på lag»?Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 99(5), 334–350.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Stæhr, L. S.
    (2008) Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. 10.1080/09571730802389975
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2009) Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577–607. 10.1017/S0272263109990039
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990039 [Google Scholar]
  69. Stanovich, K. E.
    (1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 23–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sundqvist, P.
    (2009) Extramural English matters: Out-of-school English and its impact on Swedish ninth graders’ oral proficiency and vocabulary. (PhD thesis), Karlstad University, Sweden.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. (2019) Commercial-off-the-shelf games in the digital wild and L2 learner vocabulary. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 87–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sundqvist, P. , & Wikström, P.
    (2015) Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes. System, 51, 65–76. 10.1016/j.system.2015.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sylvén, L. K. , & Sundqvist, P.
    (2012) Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24(03), 302–321. 10.1017/S095834401200016X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200016X [Google Scholar]
  74. Townsend, D. , Filippini, A. , Collins, P. , & Biancarosa, G.
    (2012) Evidence for the importance of academic word knowledge for the academic achievement of diverse middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 497–518. 10.1086/663301
    https://doi.org/10.1086/663301 [Google Scholar]
  75. Vafaee, P. , & Suzuki, Y.
    (2019) The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Ward, J.
    (2001) EST: Evading scientific text. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 141–152. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00036‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00036-8 [Google Scholar]
  77. Webb, S. , & Chang, A. C.-S.
    (2012) Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal, 43(1), 113–126. 10.1177/0033688212439367
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439367 [Google Scholar]
  78. Webb, S. , & Sasao, Y.
    (2013) New directions in vocabulary testing. RELC Journal, 44(3), 263–277. 10.1177/0033688213500582
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213500582 [Google Scholar]
  79. Webb, S. , Sasao, Y. , & Ballance, O.
    (2017) The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33–69. 10.1075/itl.168.1.02web
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.02web [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhao, A. , Guo, Y. , Biales, C. , & Olszewski, A.
    (2016) Exploring learner factors in second language (L2) incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 224–245.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error